岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1789-1799.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1683

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于LightGBM的超大沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置

董学超1, 2,郭明伟1, 2,王水林1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-26 接受日期:2022-12-09 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 郭明伟,男,1981年生,博士,副研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事计算岩土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: mwguo@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:dongxuechao18@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:董学超,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事计算岩土力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    2019年度交通运输行业重点科技项目(No.2019-MS1-011)。

Sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement of super large open caissons based on LightGBM

DONG Xue-chao1, 2, GUO Ming-wei1, 2, WANG Shui-lin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-10-26 Accepted:2022-12-09 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Key Projects in Transportation Industry 2019(2019-MS1-011).

摘要: 沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置有利于确保沉井安全平稳下沉、降低监测成本。基于机器学习中的LightGBM框架建立超大沉井下沉状态预测模型,利用沉井底部结构应力传感器监测数据,准确预测沉井下沉速度、横桥向高差和顺桥向高差,并通过传感器重要程度分析,提出可满足下沉状态预测精度的传感器优化布置方案。将提出的沉井下沉状态预测模型和传感器优化布置方法应用于常泰长江大桥主塔超大沉井下沉工程,结果表明:沉井下沉预测时,3个预测指标的R2均大于0.94,下沉状态预测精度高;对下沉状态预测较为重要的传感器主要集中在沉井外圈和横纵轴线附近区域;在满足下沉状态预测精度的条件下,传感器优化布置方案可减少传感器数量达45.5%。优化布置方案包含的传感器数量相同时,提出的优化布置方案在下沉状态预测精度方面整体优于基于特征变量相关性分析的优化布置方案。

关键词: 超大沉井, 下沉状态预测, 传感器优化布置, LightGBM, 机器学习, 特征重要性

Abstract: The sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement are conducive to ensuring safe and steady sinking of open caissons and reducing monitoring costs. Based on LightGBM, a framework in the field of machine learning, a sinking state prediction model of super large open caisson is established. By using the monitoring data of the stress sensors at the bottom of the open caisson, the sinking speed of the open caisson, the height difference in the transverse direction and the height difference along the bridge direction are accurately predicted. Through the analysis of the sensor importance, the optimal sensor placement scheme that can meet the sinking state prediction accuracy is determined. The proposed sinking state prediction model and the optimal sensor placement method were applied to the super large open caisson sinking project of the main tower of Changtai Yangtze River Bridge. The results show that the model has high accuracy in predicting the sinking state of the open caisson, and the R2 of the three prediction indexes is greater than 0.94. The important sensors for predicting the sinking state are mainly concentrated in the outer circle of the open caisson and the area near the transverse and longitudinal axes. Under the condition of satisfying the prediction accuracy of sinking state, the optimal sensor placement scheme can reduce the number of sensors by 45.5%. When the numbers of sensors in the optimal sensor placement schemes are same, the proposed optimization scheme is better than the scheme based on the correlation analysis of characteristic variables in terms of overall accuracy of sinking state prediction.

Key words: super large open caisson, sinking state prediction, optimal sensor placement, LightGBM, machine learning, feature importance

中图分类号: U446.2
[1] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[3] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[4] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[5] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[6] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[7] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[8] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[9] 蒋明镜, 张卢丰, 韩亮, 姜朋明, . 基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[10] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 孙少锐, 魏继红, . 间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[11] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[12] 苏国韶,张克实,吕海波. 位移反分析的粒子群优化-高斯过程协同优化方法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510-515.
[13] 徐 冲,刘保国,刘开云,郭佳奇. 基于组合核函数的高斯过程边坡角智能设计[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 821-826.
[14] 苏国韶,宋咏春,燕柳斌. 高斯过程机器学习在边坡稳定性评价中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 675-679.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!