岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1800-1810.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1071

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江漫滩区明挖隧道基坑降承压水优化分析

孙彦晓1,刘松玉1,童立元1,王峻2,崔佳2,李世龙3, 4,李敏3, 4   

  1. 1. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 211189;2. 江苏省交通工程建设局,江苏 南京 210004;3. 中铁十四局集团有限公司,山东 济南 250101;4. 中铁十四局集团大盾构工程有限公司,江苏 南京 211800
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-09 接受日期:2022-10-27 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 刘松玉,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土力学理论、桩基工程、特殊地基和路基稳定、地下空间技术、原位测试技术等方面的研究工作。E-mail: liusy@seu.edu.cn E-mail:Sunyx_1994@163.com
  • 作者简介:孙彦晓,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下空间技术方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41972269,No.52178384);江苏省交建局项目(No.2021QD05)。

Optimization of confined aquifer dewatering for cut and cover tunnel in Yangtze River floodplain

SUN Yan-xiao1, LIU Song-yu1, TONG Li-yuan1, WANG Jun2, CUI Jia2, LI Shi-long3, 4, LI Min3, 4   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. Jiangsu Provincial Transportation Construction Bureau, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210004, China; 3. China Railway 14th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250101, China; 4. China Railway 14th Bureau Group Mega Shield Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 211800, China
  • Received:2022-07-09 Accepted:2022-10-27 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972269, 52178384) and the Project of Jiangsu Provincial Transportation Construction Bureau (2021QD05).

摘要: 现阶段,基坑降水设计多通过理论计算结合数值模拟进行,然而,在保证安全的前提下,总抽水量仍具有优化空间。基于此,以江阴靖江长江隧道江北明挖基坑第二承压含水层降水施工为例,采用线性规划与数值模拟相结合的方法,在利用抽水试验反演渗透系数的基础上,通过数值模拟获取了构建线性规划模型的主要参数,求解了总抽水量最小时需开启的井点及对应抽水量,并与实际施工进行了对比。结果表明,在构建线性规划模型时,考虑的井数越多,管井位置越合理,得到的总抽水量和降深通常越小;对于开挖深度渐变的明挖隧道基坑,在挖深大区段抽水效率最高,此时挖深较浅区段的降水需求可能自然得到满足;降水优化可大幅降低开启井数、总抽水量和环境影响。

关键词: 承压水, 降水优化, 明挖隧道, 线性规划, 数值模拟

Abstract: Currently, dewatering scheme is typically designed using the method of theoretical calculation and numerical simulation. The designed scheme, however, is far from the optimum, since the total pumping rate can be further optimized with engineering safety ensured. Based on the dewatering in the 2nd confined aquifer of a cut and cover tunnel belonging to the north part of Jiangyin-Jingjiang Yangtze River tunnel project, dewatering optimization is conducted combining the methods of linear programming (LP) and numerical simulation. In advance, the hydraulic conductivity is adjusted by simulating the pumping test. Then, the parameters required in the LP model are obtained with numerical simulation. The pumping wells with optimal locations and the corresponding pumping rates are further determined, and the results are compared with the ones in actual construction. It is found that more number of pumping wells and more rational well location usually result in lower total pumping rate and drawdown. For the cut and cover tunnel with gradually changing excavation depths along the tunnel, dewatering in the deepest excavation zone shows the highest efficiency, since the dewatering requirements of the subsequent zones with lower excavation depths may be met simultaneously. The dewatering optimization can significantly reduce the number of activated pumping wells, total pumping rate and environmental effect.

Key words: confined water, dewatering optimization, cut and cover tunnel, linear programming, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU 46+3
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[7] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[8] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[9] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[10] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[11] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[12] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[13] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[14] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[15] 陈磊, 张强, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 黄娟, 胡晶, . 强降雨对库岸堆积体边坡稳定性影响的离心模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!