岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1811-1825.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0995

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土中水平矩形锚板竖向拉拔承载全域内三维统一力学模型与承载力计算方法研究

胡伟1, 2,王辉1, 2,姚琛3,郝冬雪4,史旦达5   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭411201;2. 湖南科技大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201; 3. 中国中铁大桥勘测设计院集团有限公司重庆分公司,重庆 400020;4. 东北电力大学 建筑工程学院,吉林 吉林 132012; 5. 上海海事大学 海洋科学与工程学院,上海 201306
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-29 接受日期:2022-10-20 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-17
  • 作者简介:胡伟,男,1982年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基与基础工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52178332,No.52078108)

Three-dimensional unified mechanical model and calculation method of uplift capacity of horizontal rectangular anchor plate in the whole region in sand

HU Wei1, 2, WANG Hui1, 2, YAO Chen3, HAO Dong-xue4, SHI Dan-da5   

  1. 1. Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 3. China Railway Major Bridge Reconnaissance & Design Institute Co., Ltd. Chongqing Branch, Chongqing 400020, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin, Jilin 132012, China; 5. College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • Received:2022-06-29 Accepted:2022-10-20 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178332, 52078108).

摘要: 水平矩形锚板竖向拉拔属于典型的三维问题,但极限状态下锚周土体滑动面形态受锚板长宽比、埋深比两个变量共同影响,表征难度大。结合ABAQUS软件三维数值模拟和二维滑动面分析结果,三维滑动面在其埋深范围内任一水平剖面上的几何形态可用4段分别与锚板长边、短边平行且相等的直线段以及4段1/4圆弧线组成的闭合图形描述;直线段与对应锚边的水平距离由长边中心竖向对称面内的滑动面决定,该二维滑动面形态仅取决于埋深比,可使用对数螺旋线形态函数进行表征。构建出了水平矩形锚板竖向拉拔承载三维力学分析模型,分析了该模型存在的4种工况。结合模型的分解与合并开展隔离体的力学极限平衡分析,推导建立了水平矩形锚板竖向拉拔承载力计算方法,该方法可在长宽比和埋深比全域范围内使用。通过与5个试验案例,3种计算方法的对比分析表明,新方法在各种密实状态砂土地基中均表现最好,具有很好的适用性。

关键词: 矩形锚板, 竖向拉拔, 滑动面, 力学模型, 承载力

Abstract: Uplift of the horizontal rectangular anchor plate is a typical three-dimensional problem. However, it is difficult to characterize the sliding surface of soil around the anchor plate in the limit state for its shape is affected by a combination of the length-width ratio and embedment ratio of the anchor plate. Combining the results of ABAQUS 3D numerical simulation and 2D sliding surface analysis, it is found that the geometric form of the 3D sliding surface in any horizontal section within its buried depth range can be described by a closed graph, including four segments of straight lines parallel and equal to the long and short sides of the anchor plate respectively and four segments of 1/4 arc. The horizontal distance between the straight line and the corresponding anchor edge is determined by the 2D sliding surface in the vertical symmetric plane in the center of the long edge. The shape of this 2D sliding surface depends only on the embedment ratio, and it can be characterized by the logarithmic spiral morphological function. Based on these understandings, a three-dimensional mechanical analysis model of uplift bearing capacity of the horizontal rectangular anchor plate was constructed for the first time, and four cases of the model were analyzed. Combining the decomposition and merging of the model, the mechanical limit equilibrium analysis of the isolation body was carried out. Then, the calculation method of uplift bearing capacity of the horizontal rectangular anchor plate was deduced. It is applicable in the whole range of the length-width ratio and embedment ratio. Compared with five test cases and three other calculation methods, the results show that the proposed method has the best performance in all kinds of sand ground with various relative densities, which shows good applicability.

Key words: rectangular anchor plate, vertical pullout, sliding surface, mechanical model, bearing capacity

中图分类号: TU441
[1] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[2] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[3] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[4] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[5] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[6] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[7] 胡伟, 曾攀煜, 王辉, 刘顺凯, 陈秋南, PUIG DAMIANS I, . 黏性土地基中水平条形锚板上拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[10] 刘润, 许泽伟, 陈广思, 梁超. 饱和软黏土中回型沉垫基础竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 381-388.
[11] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[12] 李晓照, 车行, 李海峰, 戚承志. 干湿循环脆性岩石直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1906-1916.
[13] 赵崇熙, 徐超, 王清明, 张胜, 李昊煜, . 土工合成材料加筋土桥台极限承载力的离心载荷试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[14] 胡伟, 李砥柱, 林志, 冯世进, 黄勇祥, . 双锚片螺旋锚倾斜拉拔承载特性与承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1661-1674.
[15] 颜然, 孔纲强, 于江华, . 砂土地基中钻进比对螺旋桩安装性能和抗拔承载性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1778-1788.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!