岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1837-1848.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1053

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

可液化倾斜场地的侧向扩展机制分析

贾科敏1,许成顺1,杜修力1,张小玲1,宋佳1, 2,苏卓林1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124;2. 北方工业大学 土木工程学院,北京 100144
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-06 接受日期:2022-10-26 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 许成顺,女,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程领域的研究。E-mail: xuchengshun@bjut.edu.cn E-mail:jiakemin6@163.com
  • 作者简介:贾科敏,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事土饱和砂土液化及桩基础抗震领域的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52078016);国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金(No.51722801);北京市自然科学基金面上项目(No.8192012)。

Mechanism of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in liquefiable inclined sites

JIA Ke-min1, XU Cheng-shun1, DU Xiu-li1, ZHANG Xiao-ling1, SONG Jia1, 2, SU Zhuo-lin1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China
  • Received:2022-07-06 Accepted:2022-10-26 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078016), the National Natural Science Foundation for Outstanding Young Scholars of China (51722801) and the General Program of Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8192012).

摘要: 针对已完成的液化水平自由场大型振动台试验,采用OpenSees有限元平台,建立了振动台试验的数值分析模型,并验证了该模型的可靠性。基于此,建立了地基整体倾斜的自由场数值模型,重点讨论了场地土体的非循环地震响应和液化侧向扩展机制。结果表明,建立的数值模型可以有效地模拟可液化场地的地震反应。倾斜场地中,可液化松砂与上覆非液化层界面处具有显著的相对位移,饱和砂土的应变累积从松砂层浅层开始,逐步向深层发展,超孔隙水压力增长和土体非循环应变累积未表现出耦合的现象,场地的中部土体控制非循环横向位移的发展。另一方面,土体液化过程中,当沿滑动面的剪切应力小于初始静剪应力时,液化侧向扩展启动。此时饱和松砂层的剪应力比在0.04~0.06范围内,略小于初始静剪应力比。此外,还发现液化诱导侧向扩展需要场地具有一定的倾斜度(大于0.5º);土的侧向位移符合余弦分布模式;随着场地倾斜度的增大,可液化深层土对整体侧向位移的贡献更显著。

关键词: 液化, 侧向扩展, 自由场地, 数值模拟, 地震反应, 机制, 振动台试验

Abstract: A numerical model of the liquefaction horizontal free-field shaking table test was developed based on the completed large-scale shaking table test of liquefaction horizontal free field using the OpenSees finite element platform, and the numerical model was verified. Based on this, a free-field numerical model of the overall inclined foundation was established, and the non-cyclic dynamic response of the liquefaction lateral spreading site and the mechanism of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading were discussed. The results show that the established numerical model can effectively simulate the seismic response in liquefiable sites. There was significant relative displacement at the interface between liquefiable loose sand and overlying non-liquefiable layer. In the inclined site, the strain accumulation of saturated sand soil starts from the upper part of the loose sand layer and gradually develops downward. The increase of excess pore water pressure was not completely coupled with the accumulation of non-cyclic strain of the soil. The non-cyclic lateral displacement was controlled by the middle parts of the site. In the process of soil liquefaction, when the shear stress along the sliding surface is less than the initial static shear stress, lateral spreading starts, and the shear stress ratio of the saturated loose sand layer is in the range of 0.04−0.06, which is slightly smaller than the initial static shear stress ratio. In addition, it is found that liquefaction-induced lateral spreading requires a certain site inclination (greater than 0.5º). The lateral displacement of soil conforms to the cosine distribution pattern. With the increase of site inclination, the contribution of liquefiable deep soil to the overall lateral displacement is more significant.

Key words: liquefaction, lateral spreading, free filed, numerical simulation, seismic response, mechanism, shaking table test

中图分类号: TU411.93
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 童佳荣, 张曙, 李荣, 夏彬桐, 王宁伟, . 电动化学加固技术对珠海软土改性的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 262-270.
[3] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[4] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[5] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[6] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[7] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[8] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[9] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[10] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[11] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[12] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[13] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[14] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[15] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!