岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 1875-1890.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1757

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律

赵光明1, 2，刘之喜1, 2，孟祥瑞1, 2，张若飞1, 2，顾清恒1, 2，戚敏杰1, 2   

  1. 1. 安徽理工大学 深部煤矿采动响应与灾害防控国家重点实验室，安徽 淮南 232001； 2. 安徽理工大学 煤矿安全高效开采省部共建教育部重点实验室，安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-09 接受日期:2023-02-17 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 作者简介:赵光明，男，1976年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事矿山岩石力学的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No.51974009）；安徽省科技重大专项（No.202203a07020011）；安徽省“特支计划”的领军人才项目（No.T000508）；高校协同创新项目（No.GXXT-2021-075）；安徽省学术和技术带头人科研活动经费、淮北市重大科技专项（No.Z2020005）。

Energy evolution of sandstone under true triaxial cyclic principal stress

ZHAO Guang-ming1, 2, LIU Zhi-xi1, 2, MENG Xiang-rui1, 2, ZHANG Ruo-fei1, 2, GU Qing-heng1, 2, QI Min-jie1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Safe and Effective Coal Mining, Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2022-11-09 Accepted:2023-02-17 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51974009), Anhui Province Science and Technology Major Project (202203a07020011), Anhui Province “Special Support Plan” Leading Talents Project (T000508), the University Collaborative Innovation Project (GXXT-2021-075), Anhui Province Academic and Technology Leaders Research Activities Fund and Huaibei City Major Science and Technology Project (Z2020005).

PDF (Chinese)

131

摘要： 为了探究真三轴主应力循环加卸载对砂岩能量积聚与耗散的影响，利用自主研发的真三轴扰动卸荷岩石测试系统进行了3个主应力循环加卸载试验。基于真三轴循环加卸载应力−应变演化规律与加卸载特征，划分了主应力循环加卸载试验中加载、卸载的种类；通过对三向主应力循环加卸载过后岩体表面裂纹对比分析，发现最小主应循环对岩体产生损伤最大，中间主应力次之，最大主应产生损伤最小；利用图形面积积分法与叠加法分别计算了真三轴循环加卸载的弹性能密度、耗散能密度与输入能密度，分析了三者随主应力次数增加的演化规律与加卸载过程中的能量分配；利用真三轴同时加卸载试验，验证了上述提出的能量分析方法的合理性与准确性，对其3个主应力方向卸载释放弹性能密度分析，发现循环加卸载产生的损伤对岩体储存弹性能密度影响较小。对比了3个主应力卸载对砂岩损伤与能量耗散的影响，对巷道掘进方向进行了进一步讨论。

关键词: 岩石力学, 真三轴循环加卸载, 能量积聚, 能量耗散, 加卸载分类, 能量演化

Abstract: To explore the influence of true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading in principal stress directions on sandstone energy accumulation and dissipation, three cyclic loading and unloading tests in principal stress directions were carried out by using the self-developed true triaxial disturbed unloading rock testing system. Based on the stress-strain evolution law and the loading and unloading characteristics of true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading tests, the types of loading and unloading in the cyclic loading and unloading tests are classified. Through the comparative analysis of the surface cracks of rock mass after cyclic loading and unloading in three principal stress directions, it is found that the minimum principal stress cycle causes the severest damage to rock mass, followed by the intermediate principal stress, and the maximum principal stress causes the least damage. The elastic energy density, dissipated energy density, and input energy density of true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading are calculated by using the graph area integral method and the superposition method, respectively. The evolution laws of the above three densities with the increase of the number of principal stresses and the energy distribution during loading and unloading are analyzed. The rationality and accuracy of the proposed energy analysis method are verified by the true triaxial loading and unloading test, and the elastic energy released by unloading in three principal stress directions is analyzed. The damage caused by cyclic loading and unloading has little influence on the elastic energy stored in the rock mass. The influences of unloading independently in three principal stress directions on sandstone damage and energy dissipation are compared, and the advancing direction of the roadway is further discussed.

Key words: rock mechanics, true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading, energy accumulation, energy dissipation, loading and unloading classification, energy evolution

中图分类号: TU451
[1] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[2] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[3] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[4] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[5] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[6] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[7] 马语航, 何明明, 李宁, . XCY-2旋切触探系统研发及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1025-1038.
[8] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[9] 李利萍, 余泓浩, 李秋雨, 潘一山, . 含水煤块超低摩擦效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3093-3103.
[10] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[11] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[12] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 基于声发射特征参数的砂岩节理直剪破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 167-177.
[13] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[14] 苗柯韩, 黄勇, 马晓凡, 王超琦. 基于分形理论的岩体粗糙裂隙中溶质运移预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2527-2538.
[15] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发