岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 1983-1994.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1283

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究

张院生1,雷云超2,强小俊1,吴东东2,王东坡2,王计华1   

  1. 1. 铁科院(深圳)研究设计院有限公司,广东 深圳 518060;2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-18 接受日期:2023-01-04 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 王东坡,男,1984年生,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事地质灾害综合防灾新技术新方法研究。E-mail: wangdongpo@cdut.edu.cn E-mail:gunxueren@163.com
  • 作者简介:张院生,男,1989年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事地质灾害防治技术研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司基金(No.2019YJ180)。

Centrifugal model test of slope reinforced by multi-row micro-pile frame structure

ZHANG Yuan-sheng1, LEI Yun-chao2, QIANG Xiao-jun1, WU Dong-dong2, WANG Dong-po2, WANG Ji-hua1   

  1. 1. China Academy of Railway Sciences(Shenzhen) Research and Design Institute Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2022-08-18 Accepted:2023-01-04 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the China Academy of Railway Sciences Foundation of (2019YJ180).

摘要: 多排微型桩框架结构是边坡治理的一种有效手段,其理论研究滞后于工程应用。为研究该结构在边坡加固中的变形、受力特征和加固机制,开展了多排微型桩框架结构加固土质边坡离心模型试验。研究表明:试验中边坡变形破坏模式为蠕 滑−拉裂型推移式变形破坏,分为弹性变形、塑性变形、变形稳定3阶段;与未加固边坡相比,基于多排微型桩框架结构加固的边坡抗滑稳定性显著提高,边坡稳定性系数最高提升了156%;试验中影响边坡加固效果的因素重要性依次为锚固深度、桩数、桩间距;土压力作为滑坡向前推力,沿深度方向近似呈“上小下大”的三角形分布,作用于桩−土复合结构使桩身和框架梁弯矩曲线分别呈现反S形和反C形分布;框架横、纵梁弯矩分布受布桩方式影响显著,4排×4列的框架横、纵梁最大弯矩值相近,而4排×3列的纵梁最大弯矩值是横梁的3倍。研究成果可为该结构在工程应用上提供理论指导与设计依据。

关键词: 土质边坡, 多排微型桩框架结构, 离心模型试验, 变形破坏机制, 桩土作用机制

Abstract: Multi-row micro-pile frame structure is an effective means for slope treatment, and its theoretical research lags behind the engineering application. To study the deformation and stress characteristics and reinforcement mechanism of the structure in slope reinforcement, the centrifugal model test of the slope reinforced by multi-row micro-pile frame structure was carried out. The test results show that the deformation and failure mode of the slope in the test is creep-tensile thrust-type, which is divided into three stages: elastic deformation, plastic deformation and deformation stability. Compared with the unreinforced slope, the anti-slide stability of the slope reinforced by multi-row micro-pile frame structure is significantly improved, and the factor of safety for the slope is increased by 156%. The importance of the factors affecting the slope reinforcement effect in the test is the anchorage depth, the number of piles, and the pile spacing. As the forward thrust of landslide, the soil pressure approximately presents a triangle distribution of ‘small in the upper part and large in the lower part’ along the depth direction, acting on the pile-soil composite structure, and the bending moment curves of pile body and frame beam present the reserved ‘S’ and ‘C’ distributions, respectively. The bending moment distribution of frame transverse and longitudinal beams is significantly affected by pile arrangement. The maximum bending moments of frame transverse and longitudinal beams in 4 rows × 4 columns are similar, while the maximum bending moment of longitudinal beams in 4 rows × 3 columns is nearly three times that of transverse beams. The research results can provide theoretical guidance and design basis for the structure in engineering application.

Key words: soil slope, multi-row micro-pile frame structure, centrifugal model test, slope failure and deformation mechanism, mechanism of pile-soil interaction

中图分类号: TU473.1
[1] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[2] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[3] 陈磊, 张强, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 黄娟, 胡晶, . 强降雨对库岸堆积体边坡稳定性影响的离心模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
[4] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[5] 马鹏杰, 芮瑞, 曹先振, 夏荣基, 王曦, 丁锐恒, 孙天健, . 微型桩加固长大缓倾裂隙土边坡模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1695-1707.
[6] 彭文明, 张雪东, 夏勇, . 软弱覆盖层上土石坝动力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1771-1778.
[7] 罗维平, 袁大军, 金大龙, 陆平, 陈健, 郭海鹏, . 富水砂层盾构开挖面支护压力与地层变形关系 离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 345-354.
[8] 兰景岩, 蔡金豆, 吴连斌, 史庆旗, . 含隧道场地地震动放大效应的深度变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2083-2091.
[9] 孙志豪, 谭晓慧, 孙志彬, 林鑫, 姚玉川, . 基于上限分析的空间变异土质边坡可靠度[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3397-3406.
[10] 朱谭方, 辛鹏, 姚磊华, 胡乐, 胡波, . 水力作用诱发硬土软岩滑坡启动机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2733-2740.
[11] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[12] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
[13] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[14] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[15] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!