岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2017-2027.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1142

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于能量理论的球孔扩张大变形分析

李超1, 2,莫品强1, 2, 3,李树忱1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学 深地工程智能建造与健康运维全国重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116;2. 中国矿业大学 力学与土木工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116; 3. 深圳市城市公共安全 技术研究院,广东 深圳 518046
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-21 接受日期:2022-08-08 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 莫品强,男,1988年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土力学与基础工程方面的研究。E-mail: pinqiang.mo@cumt.edu.cn E-mail: lichaogeo@126.com
  • 作者简介:李超,男,1990年生,博士,讲师,主要从事土力学与基础工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研基金(No.2022QN1019);江苏省双创博士计划(2022);国家自然科学面上项目(No.52178374)。

Large-deformation analysis of spherical cavity expansion problem using energy theory

LI Chao1, 2, MO Pin-qiang1, 2, 3, LI Shu-chen1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518046, China
  • Received:2022-07-21 Accepted:2022-08-08 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities”(2022QN1019), Doctor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Jiangsu Province (2022) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178374).

摘要: 以常用的摩尔−库仑强度准则模拟弹塑性区的本构关系,研究小孔扩张问题,推导了扩孔压力和能耗理论解。基于球孔扩张的假设,结合能量理论和非关联流动法则,将扩孔过程视为能量转换问题,进行黏土大应变能耗分析。弹性区采用小应变理论分析。考虑塑性区弹性变形和塑性区大应变的影响,得到了扩孔压力、能耗与扩孔半径的关系。通过与已发表结果比较,验证了所提方法的有效性。最后,研究塑性区弹性变形和大应变对扩孔压力和能耗的影响。结果表明,扩孔压力随剪胀角的增大而增大,外力所做的大部分功在塑性区转化为能量。剪胀角对塑性区域发展和扩孔压力演化影响显著,随着剪胀角的增加,塑性区半径和扩孔压力明显增加。该能耗理论解为揭示注浆、土工试验与贯入桩等方面提供了一种新的分析手段和必要的理论依据。

关键词: 能耗理论解, 球孔扩张, 黏土, 大应变

Abstract: The constitutive relation of elasto-plastic zone is simulated by Mohr-Coulomb criterion (M-C), and the theoretical solutions of cavity expansion pressure and energy dissipation are derived. Based on the assumption of spherical cavity expansion, combining with energy theory and non-associated flow rule, the process of cavity expansion is regarded as an energy conversion problem, and the large-strain energy dissipation analysis of cohesive-frictional soils is carried out. Firstly, the elastic zone is analyzed by a small-strain theory. Then, considering the effects of elastic deformation and large strain in plastic zone, the relationship among cavity expansion pressure, energy dissipation and radius is obtained. Compared with the published results, the effectiveness of the study is verified. Finally, the effects of elastic deformation and large strain in the plastic zone on cavity expansion pressure and energy dissipation are studied. The results show that the cavity expansion pressure increases with the increase of the dilatancy angle, and most of the work done by the external force is transformed into energy in the plastic zone. The dilatancy angle has a significant effect on the change of the plastic zone and the cavity expansion pressure. With the increase of dilatancy angle, the radius of plastic zone and the cavity expansion pressure increase significantly. The energy dissipation analysis provides a new analytical method and necessary theoretical basis for understanding of the mechanisms of grouting, geotechnical test and driven pile.

Key words: energy dissipation, spherical cavity expansion, cohesive-frictional soils, large-strain

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 段书苏, 候志强, 王志佳, 胡俊, 张友良, 张建经. D-山梨醇对微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积作用效果及加固红黏土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 238-248.
[2] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[3] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[4] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[5] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[6] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[7] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[8] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[9] KOCHARYAN Gevorg, OSTAPCHUK Alexey, SHATUNOV Ivan, 戚承志. 含黏土断层滑动行为稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3513-3522.
[10] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[11] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[12] 李世昌, 李剑, 余飞, 耿赟, 杨奇志, 王江琛, . 峰前等剪应力幅值下黏土−混凝土接触面小变形特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 208-216.
[13] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
[14] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[15] 高鲁超, 戴国亮, 张继生, 万志辉, 姚中原, 王洋, . 软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!