岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2308-2317.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1387

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

无砟轨道聚氨酯碎石防水联结层单元模型试验研究

谢康1,苏谦2,陈晓斌1,刘宝3,王武斌2,王迅2,邓志兴2   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610003; 3. 中国铁路设计集团有限公司,天津 300308
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-08 接受日期:2022-11-13 出版日期:2023-08-21 发布日期:2023-08-21
  • 通讯作者: 陈晓斌,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事交通岩土工程领域的教学研究工作。E-mail:chen_xiaobin@csu.edu.cn E-mail:xiekang1995@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:谢康,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事智慧岩土控制技术方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51978674);中国铁道科学研究院集团重点课题(No. 2020YJ143);中国铁路设计集团重点课题(No. 2020YY240606);中南大学研究生创业计划(No. 2022ZZTS0622)。

Element model test on polyurethane crushed stone waterproof bonding layer of ballastless track

XIE Kang1, SU Qian2, CHEN Xiao-bin1, LIU Bao3, WANG Wu-bin2, WANG Xun2, DENG Zhi-xing2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610003, China; 3. China Railway Design Corporation, Tianjin 300308, China
  • Received:2022-09-08 Accepted:2022-11-13 Online:2023-08-21 Published:2023-08-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978674), the China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd. Research Fund (2020YJ143), the China Railway Design Group Key Project (2020YY240606) and the Graduate Student Innovation Project of Central South University (2022ZZTS0622).

摘要: 基于无砟轨道基床表层水力损伤病害产生机制,提出一种在基床表层上设置聚氨酯碎石防水联结层的水力损伤控制措施。通过建立级配碎石组(J-0)、透水型聚氨酯碎石组(J-5)及致密型聚氨酯碎石组(J-10)3组试验模型,研究聚氨酯碎石防水联结层的静动力特性、疲劳特性与防水特性。结果表明:静力加卸载作用下,J-10残余应变为2.6×10–6,最大位移约为1.0 mm,与下部基床表层级配碎石层变形适应性良好,耗能效果明显,在列车动力荷载水平作用下,可减小基床表层动变形与动应力幅值,增大动应力扩散范围;在长期动力循环荷载作用下,J-0与J-5在注水后结构层动力响应显著增大,而J-10动力响应在加载次数1~2万次后基本保持稳定;试验过程中J-10能够有效防止水分进入基床表层级配碎石层,而J-0与J-5水分不断下渗,引起级配碎石细颗粒损失。研究成果对整治多雨地区无砟轨道基床表层水力损伤病害具有重要的应用价值。

关键词: 无砟轨道, 模型试验, 水力损伤, 聚氨酯碎石, 防水联结层

Abstract: Based on the mechanism of hydraulic damage of the surface layer of ballastless track subgrade bed, a hydraulic damage control measure of setting polyurethane crushed stone waterproof bonding layer on the surface layer of subgrade bed is proposed. By establishing three groups of test models of graded crushed stone group (J-0), permeable polyurethane crushed stone group (J-5) and dense polyurethane crushed stone group (J-10), the static and dynamic characteristics, fatigue characteristics and waterproof characteristics of polyurethane crushed stone waterproof bonding layer are studied. The results show that the residual strain of J-10 is 2.6×10–6 under static loading and unloading, and the maximum displacement is about 1.0 mm. It has a good deformation adaptability with the surface layer of the subgrade bed and an obvious energy consumption. Under the action of the train dynamic load, it can reduce the amplitude of dynamic deformation and dynamic stress on the surface of the subgrade bed and increase the expansion range of dynamic stress. Under the action of the long-term dynamic cyclic load, the dynamic response of structural layer of J-0 and J-5 increases significantly after water injection, while the dynamic response of J-10 remains basically stable after 10 000–20 000 times loading. During the test, J-10 can effectively prevent water from entering the crushed stone layer on the surface of the subgrade bed, while water continuously infiltrates in J-0 and J-5, causing the erosion of fine particles of graded crushed stone. The research work has an important application value for the treatment of hydraulic damage on the surface of ballastless track subgrade bed in rainy areas.

Key words: ballastless track, model test, hydraulic damage, polyurethane crushed stone, waterproof bonding layer

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[15] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!