岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2707-2716.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1583

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土地区超深圆形竖井的坑底隆起特性与机制

乔亚飞1, 2,闫凯1, 3,赵腾腾4,丁文其1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海 200082;4. 上海城投水务工程项目管理公司,上海 200002
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-12 接受日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-09-11 发布日期:2023-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 丁文其,男,1969年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程的教学和科研工作。E-mail: dingwq@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:yafei.qiao@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:乔亚飞,男,1990年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土力学及隧道工程方面的科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大项目课题(No.52090083);上海市晨光计划项目(No.20CG26);上海市苏州河深隧项目横向课题。

Characteristics and mechanism of soil heave at the bottom of ultra-deep circular shafts in soft soil areas

QIAO Ya-fei1, 2, YAN Kai1, 3, ZHAO Teng-teng4, DING Wen-qi1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China; 4. Engineering Project Management Company, Shanghai Chengtou Water Group, Shanghai 200002, China
  • Received:2022-10-12 Accepted:2023-01-03 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Project (52090083), Shanghai Chengaung Program (20CG26) and Consulting Project on Shanghai Deep Tunnel Project.

摘要: 依托上海某超深圆形竖井工程,收集了施工期坑底土体隆起的实测数据,总结了坑底土体隆起的竖向分布模式、演变规律和主要影响因素;建立并验证了轴对称数值模型,探讨了开挖卸荷、降水、地下连续墙和土体力学特性对坑底土体隆起的影响规律,探明了坑底土体的隆起机制。土体隆起是开挖卸荷、降水和地下连续墙约束作用下土体力学响应的综合结果,其中开挖卸荷和墙体挤压会引起隆起,降水和墙体的负摩阻力会抑制隆起。开挖卸荷存在主要影响深度,卸荷回弹主导了该深度范围内土体的隆起,而土体剪切变形则控制了该深度范围外的土体隆起。土体流变以及负孔隙水压的消散共同导致了土体隆起的时间依赖性。软土地区小直径超深竖井的坑底隆起沿深度方向减小近似线性,最大值位于开挖面中心处;土体隆起随开挖先缓慢增加后近似线性快速增大,而在非开挖阶段,土体隆起随时间有缓慢增大趋势。

关键词: 超深圆形竖井, 土体隆起, 机制, 监测数据, 数值模拟

Abstract: Based on an ultra-deep circular shaft project in Shanghai, the field data of soil heave at the bottom of the pit during the construction were collected, and the vertical distribution pattern, evolution law and main influencing factors of soil heave at the bottom of the pit were summarized. An axisymmetric numerical model was then built and verified to investigate the effect of the excavation-induced unloading, dewatering, diaphragm wall and soil mechanical properties on the soil heave, then the mechanism of soil heave was revealed. Soil heave was the combined result of the soil mechanical response under the excavation-induced unloading, dewatering, and diaphragm wall restraint, in which the excavation-induced unloading and the deflection of the diaphragm wall caused the soil heave, and the dewatering and the negative frictional resistance inhibited the soil heave. Excavation-induced unloading had a prominent influence on the depth, and the unloading rebound mechanism dominated the soil heave within that depth, while the shear deformation controlled the soil heave beyond that depth range. Soil rheology and dissipation of negative pore water pressure jointly led to the time dependence of soil heave. The soil heave at the pit bottom of small-diameter ultra-deep shafts in soft soil areas decreased approximately linearly along the depth, and its maximum value was located at the center of the excavation face. The soil heave first increased slowly and then increased near linearly and rapidly with the increase of excavation depth. However, the soil heave tended to increase slowly with time in the non-excavation stage.

Key words: ultra-deep circular shaft, soil heave, mechanism, monitoring data, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 童佳荣, 张曙, 李荣, 夏彬桐, 王宁伟, . 电动化学加固技术对珠海软土改性的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 262-270.
[3] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[4] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[5] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[6] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[7] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[8] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[9] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[10] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[11] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[12] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
[13] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[14] 侯公羽, 张世欧, 崔迪, 陈宏波, 毕立原, 尚宇豪. 分布式光纤传感器在大体积混凝土筏板基础中的耦合性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1310-1322.
[15] 华心祝, 李琛, 刘啸, 杨朋, 陈登红, 祁亚宝, . 深井切顶留巷底鼓机制及其防控[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 955-968.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!