岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 495-503.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1226

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

双锚杆受力机制分析及模型试验研究

杨凯丞1, 2,吴曙光1, 2,廖海成1, 2,张辉1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045; 2. 重庆大学 库区环境地质灾害防治国家地方联合工程研究中心,重庆 400045
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-08 接受日期:2022-09-18 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 吴曙光,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程研究。E-mail: wushuguang@cqu.edu.cn E-mail:q18604594977@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨凯丞,男,1997年生,硕士,主要从事边坡工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC1505501)

Mechanism analysis and model test research on double anchor rods

YANG Kai-cheng1, 2, WU Shu-guang1, 2, LIAO Hai-cheng1, 2, ZHANG Hui1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. National Joint Engineering Research Center of Geohazards Prevention in the Reservoir Areas , Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)
  • Received:2022-08-08 Accepted:2022-09-18 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supperted by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1505501).

摘要: 为了研究锚杆间距对全长黏结锚杆之间相互作用产生的影响,推导出基于Mindlin解的双锚杆锚固段应力分布近似解,并结合单锚和双锚静载拉拔模型试验,得到了锚杆间距改变对双锚杆应力分布、极限承载力及最终破坏形态的影响规律。结果表明:间距减小使得锚杆的轴向应力和侧摩阻力呈现均匀化趋势,且轴向应力随间距减小而增大,锚固段中部增长幅度最大。当锚固系统进入破坏阶段,随着间距减小,锚固系统周边岩体破坏的位置深度增加,破坏锥形体的面积增大,并由单锚的倒锥状破坏转变为复合破坏模式。间距过小时,增加锚杆数量对承载力的提升十分有限,为起到锚固联合作用,锚杆间距应不小于10 D(D为锚杆直径),在软弱岩体中间距取值应加大。

关键词: 全长黏结锚杆, 锚杆间距, 模型试验, 应力分布, 破坏机制

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of anchor spacing on the interaction between full-length bonded anchor rods, an approximate solution of stress distribution in the anchorage section of double anchor rods based on the Mindlin solution was derived. By combining with the single and double anchor static load pullout model tests, the effect of changing anchor spacing on the stress distribution, ultimate bearing capacity and final damage pattern of double anchor rods were obtained. The results show that the decrease in spacing makes the axial stress and lateral friction resistance of the anchor rods uniform. The axial stress increases with the decrease in spacing, and the middle of the anchorage section has the largest increase. When the anchor system enters the damage phase, the depth of the rock damage around the anchor system increases with decreasing spacing, and the area of the damage cone increases and changes from inverted cone damage of a single anchor to compound damage mode. When the spacing is too small, the increase in the number of anchor rods is very limited for improving the bearing capacity. In order to exert the joint effect of anchoring, the spacing of anchor rods should be not less than 10 D (D is the diameter of the anchor rod), and the spacing should be larger in soft rock.

Key words: full-length bonded anchor, anchor spacing, model test, stress distribution, damage mechanism

中图分类号: U 455
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[15] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!