岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 548-560.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0864

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

央达隧道掌子面前方边坡地表开裂研究

苟永平1,叶琼瑶2,韦立德3,司家琛1   

  1. 1. 葛洲坝集团交通投资有限公司,广西 百色 533500;2. 广西交通设计集团有限公司,广西 南宁 530029; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-08 接受日期:2022-06-30 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 韦立德,男,1974年生,博士(后),副研究员,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研工作。E-mail:ldwei@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:547229851@qq.com
  • 作者简介:苟永平,男,1972年生,学士,高级工程师,主要从事水利水电工程施工与岩土工程科研方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51074152);广西交通运输行业重点科技项目(No. 2020-1-14)。

Study on ground fracturing of the slope in front of heading face of Yangda tunnel

GOU Yong-ping1, YE Qiong-yao2, WEI Li-de3, SI Jia-chen1   

  1. 1. Gezhouba Group Transportation Investment Co., Ltd., Baise, Guangxi 533500, China; 2. Guangxi Communications Design Group Co., Ltd., Nanning, Guangxi 530029, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2022-06-08 Accepted:2022-06-30 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51074152) and the Key Science and Technology Project of Guangxi Transportation (2020-1-14).

摘要: 隧道开挖引起掌子面前方边坡离掌子面水平距离超过5倍隧道断面尺寸的地方地表开裂问题是急需解决的课题。将广西央达隧道开挖引起掌子面前方边坡开裂问题作为工程实例,采用地质勘察和边坡监测手段开展研究,并建议了一个基于有限差分软件FLAC3D遍布节理模型的分析模型进行分析,该分析模型利用有限差分软件FLAC3D遍布节理模型和反演技术分析考虑优势节理影响的隧道开挖的边坡响应,重点分析塑性屈服区分布特征。工程勘察研究结果表明优势节理J1倾向与滑动条带主滑方向基本一致;边坡监测研究结果给出了主滑段最大埋深大约为15~18 m和采取边坡加固措施后的边坡滑移范围;数值模拟结果主滑段埋深与监测结果的估计深度接近,边坡后缘裂缝两端点直线段长度为63 m,与裂纹实际长度接近,裂缝端点与隧道掌子面之间距离为99 m,与实际距离90 m接近。分析结果表明,本研究建议的分析模型合理可行,且对类似工程具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 隧道开挖, 边坡, 开裂, 地质勘查, 边坡监测, 遍布节理模型

Abstract: The ground fracturing of slope in front of the tunnel face, whose horizontal distance exceeds 5 times of the tunnel section size from the tunnel face, has become an urgent issue. To address this issue, the ground fracturing of slope in front of heading face of Yangda tunnel in Guangxi caused by the tunnel excavation was studied by means of geological exploration and slope monitoring as a project example, and the following simulation model of the finite difference software FLAC3D based on ubiquitous-joint model was suggested to simulate the ground fracturing. The response of the slope caused by tunnel excavation considering the influence of dominant joints was calculated with the finite difference software FLAC3D based on ubiquitous-joint model and the inverse technique, and the distribution characteristics of plastic zone was laid special stress on. The results from geological exploration showed that the dip direction of the dominant joint J1 was almost the same as the slip direction of main sliding body. The results from slope monitoring showed that the maximum buried depth of main sliding body was from 15 m to 18 m and the slope sliding area after slope reinforcement was given. The results from numerical simulation showed that the maximum buried depth of main sliding body was close to that from slope monitoring results, the 63 m linear length between the two ends of the top fracture of the slope was close to that of the actual fracture, and the distance from one of the ends of the top fracture to one of the heading faces, 99 m, was close to the actual distance 90 m. The results indicate that the suggested simulation model is feasible and available and it can be referred for similar engineering.

Key words: tunnel excavation, slope, ground fracturing, geological exploration, slope monitoring, ubiquitous-joint model

中图分类号: TU 456
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[5] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[6] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[7] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[8] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[9] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[10] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[11] 陶高梁, 周恒洁, 肖衡林, 周宏豫, . 新型边坡防护生态基材的力学-植生性能与抗冲刷效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3018-3032.
[12] 邓志平, 钟敏, 蒋水华, 潘敏, 黄劲松, . 土体参数非平稳随机场模拟及三维边坡高效可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3243-3252.
[13] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[14] 任富强, 谷金泽, 孙博, 常远, . 含不同孔洞类岩石材料的动力响应机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 654-664.
[15] 宋丽, 许领, 李杭州, 李伟, . 考虑中间主应力影响的非饱和黄土边坡抗滑桩间距研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 517-524.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!