岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 846-856.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0456

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

束浆挤扩钢管桩竖向抗拔承载力计算方法

王长虹,杨天笑,马铖涛,沈洋   

  1. 上海大学 力学与工程科学学院土木工程系,上海 200444
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-13 接受日期:2023-07-02 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 作者简介:王长虹,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事随机岩土力学−贝叶斯方法的研究。E-mail: Changhong_Wang@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海高校特聘教授岗位计划(No.TP2018042);上海市浦江人才计划(No.18PJ1403900);上海市社会发展科技攻关项目(No.21DZ1204300)。

Calculation of uplift capacity of steel pipe pile with constrained grouting

WANG Chang-hong, YANG Tian-xiao, MA Cheng-tao, SHEN Yang   

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, School of Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Received:2023-04-13 Accepted:2023-07-02 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Program for Professor of Special Appointment at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (TP2018042), the Shanghai Pujiang Program (18PJ1403900) and the Social Development Science and Technology Research Projects of Shanghai (21DZ1204300).

摘要: 随着城市地下空间的开发,深厚黏性土地区的基础抗浮问题愈发凸显。钻孔预制桩因环境友好,得到了广泛的应用,但钻孔过程削弱了预制桩的抗拔性能。拟开发一种新型的约束注浆挤扩钢管桩,为了准确评估束浆挤扩桩的承载力,分析了抗拔桩的破坏模式。基于对数螺旋线,提出局部滑裂面理论。采用经典案例,验证了抗拔承载力公式的有效性。基于正交试验设计理念,研究了束浆挤扩桩承载力的影响因素。结果表明,桩径和桩−土界面强度,对抗拔承载力的贡献最大。开展束浆挤扩桩的现场抗拔试验,与同直径钢管桩相比,束浆挤扩工艺可提高抗拔承载力达到70%。使用简化计算公式,计算基桩的抗拔承载力,误差控制在5%以内,更为准确安全。研究结果为约束注浆挤扩钢管桩承载力的设计和优化,提供了理论和技术参考。

关键词: 束浆挤扩, 钢管桩, 抗拔承载力, 对数螺旋线, 简化计算方法

Abstract: With exploiting of the urban underground space, the problem of anti-floating foundation becomes prominent in the soft soil areas. Bored and precast piles are widely used due to their environmental friendliness, but drilling process typically reduces the shaft resistance. Thus a constrained grouting pile is proposed. In order to accurately evaluate the uplift capacity of steel pipe pile with constrained grouting, the failure mechanism is analyzed, and the logarithmic spiral curve is adopted to fit the local slip surface. The simplified calculation formula is derived, and its effectiveness is verified by a classic case study. Based on the design concept of orthogonal experiment, the influencing factors of uplift capacity are compared. The results show that the diameter of pile and the strength of pile-soil interface control the uplift capacity. Field test on the steel pipe pile with constrained grouting is carried out. The test shows that the uplift capacity of the pile is increased by 70%. It is more accurate and safer to use the theoretical formula proposed to calculate the uplift capacity of foundation pile. The research results provide reference for the uplift capacity design of the constrained grouting piles.

Key words: constrained grouting process, steel pipe pile, uplift capacity, logarithmic spiral curve, simplified calculation method

中图分类号: TU47
[1] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[2] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[3] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[4] 张军舰, 张勇, 隋倩倩, . 微型钢管桩内接于灌注桩围护结构计算方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 867-877.
[5] 刘润, 尹瑞龙, 梁超, 陈广思. 黏土中超大直径钢管桩内侧摩阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 232-240.
[6] 张驰, 赖俊荣, 阮芳伟, 徐永华, 王勇, 刘观仕, 徐国方, . 海洋钢管桩发生溜桩的地层条件及 桩侧动摩阻力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 355-360.
[7] 朱鸿鹄, 高宇新, 李元海, 倪钰菲, . 土工格栅加筋砂土中水平锚板抗拔特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1207-1214.
[8] 周航, 余昊, 曾少华, . 饱和黏土中螺旋桩安装效应对抗拔承载力影响 的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3249-3258.
[9] 肖飞, 孔令伟, 刘观仕, 冯衡, 董义义, 曾二贤, . 中密风积沙地层金属装配式基础抗拔模型试 验与承载力改进计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 65-75.
[10] 刘志鹏, 孔纲强, 文磊, 王志华, 秦红玉, . 砂土地基中倾斜螺旋桩群桩上拔与水平 承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1944-1950.
[11] 李青松, 文磊, 孔纲强, 高洪梅, 申志福, . 基于孔扩张理论的螺旋桩抗拔承载力计算分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1088-1094.
[12] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[13] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[14] 李瑞山, 袁晓铭. 成层场地基本周期简化计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3227-3235.
[15] 王 珍, 曹兰柱, 王 东, . 非均质边坡稳定性上限分析评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 737-742.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!