岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1051-1066.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0635

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非线性M-C强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡时效稳定性分析M-P法

邓东平1,杨春会2,谢志军3   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 湖南路桥建设集团有限责任公司,湖南 长沙 410000; 3. 湖南省平益高速公路建设开发有限公司,湖南 岳阳 414517
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-21 接受日期:2023-08-28 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-17
  • 作者简介:邓东平,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail:dengdp@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52278380);湖南省自然科学基金(No. 2023JJ30670);湖南省交通运输厅科技项目(No. 202008)。

M-P method for analyzing the long-term stability of slope reinforced by pre-stressed cables under the nonlinear M-C strength criterion

DENG Dong-ping1, YANG Chun-hui2, XIE Zhi-jun3   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. Hunan Road and Bridge Construction Group Co. Ltd., Changsha, Hunan 410000, China; 3. Hunan Pingyi Expressway Construction and Development Co. Ltd., Yueyang, Hunan 414517, China
  • Received:2023-05-21 Accepted:2023-08-28 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278380), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ30670) and the Hunan Provincial Transportation Department Science and Technology Project of China (202008).

摘要: 拓展传统极限平衡方法在复杂条件下边坡稳定性分析中的适用性一直是岩土工程界的研究热点。众所周知,边坡岩土体剪切失效一般服从于非线性强度准则,而传统极限平衡方法仅适用于线性强度准则下边坡稳定性分析。此外,预应力锚索作为一种主动防护措施,可极大地即时提高边坡稳定性而被广泛应用于中、大型边坡工程加固。然而,在应力松弛、蠕变效应以及腐蚀环境影响下预应力锚索加固边坡稳定性时效特征往往被忽视。由此,基于Morgenstern-Price(M-P)法,嵌入非线性Mohr-Coulomb(M-C)强度准则,并融入应力松弛与蠕变效应下锚索预应力损失模型以及腐蚀环境下锚索性能劣化模型,从而,建立非线性强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡安全系数时程表达式。进一步,为了解决非线性强度准则下隐式嵌套公式难以求解的问题,归零化条间法向力初始值,并应用迭代循环求解策略,在引入循环终止允许误差判别条件后,可实现边坡稳定性理论真实结果的逼近求解。经过后续算例对比分析,验证了所提方法的可行性和合理性,与此同时,还研究了不同预应力损失速率和不同锈蚀环境下预应力锚索加固边坡稳定性的时效变化规律。

关键词: 边坡, 极限平衡M-P法, 非线性M-C强度准则, 预应力锚索加固, 时效稳定性

Abstract: Expanding the applicability of traditional limit equilibrium (LE) methods in slope stability analysis under complex conditions has been a research hotspot in geotechnical engineering field. It is recognized that the shear failure of geotechnical body of slope is typically governed by nonlinear strength criteria, while the traditional LE method is only applicable to the slope stability analysis under the linear strength criterion. Pre-stressed anchors, as an active protection measure, are widely used in the reinforcement of medium and large-scale slope projects because they can greatly and instantly improve the stability of slopes. However, the long-term stability characteristics of slope reinforced by the pre-stressed cables, including stress relaxation, creep, and the effects of corrosion, are often overlooked. To address these issues, an approach based on the Morgenstern-Price (M-P) has been developed. This method incorporates the nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) criterion and integrates the pre-stress loss model of the cables under stress relaxation and creep effects, as well as the performance deterioration model of the cables under the influence of corrosion. In order to tackle the challenge of solving implicit nested formulas under the nonlinear strength criterion, the initial value of the inter-slice normal force is set to zero, and an iterative loop calculation strategy is applied. Subsequently, the approximation of the real theoretical results of slope stability can be realized by introducing the criterion of the allowable error of loop termination. Through comparison and analysis of various examples, the feasibility and rationality of this method have been verified. Furthermore, the variation patterns of long-term stability of slope reinforced by the pre-stressed cables under different pre-stressed loss rates and different corrosion environments are also studied.

Key words: slope, limit equilibrium M-P method, nonlinear M-C strength criterion, reinforced by pre-stressed cables, long-term stability

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[5] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[6] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[7] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[8] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[9] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[10] 邓志平, 钟敏, 蒋水华, 潘敏, 黄劲松, . 土体参数非平稳随机场模拟及三维边坡高效可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3243-3252.
[11] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[12] 宋丽, 许领, 李杭州, 李伟, . 考虑中间主应力影响的非饱和黄土边坡抗滑桩间距研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 517-524.
[13] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[14] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[15] 李洪亚, 马林建, 刘杰, 李增, 邓家军, 许宏发, . 周期性孔隙水压作用下砂岩损伤劣化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2000-2010.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!