岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1686-1698.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0826

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于界面本构模型的砂土中单桩荷载−沉降响应预测方法

周攀1, 2,李镜培1, 2,李盼盼1, 2,刘耕云1, 2,张超哲3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-17 接受日期:2023-08-10 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-19
  • 通讯作者: 李镜培,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学及桩基础工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: lijp2773@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周攀,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学及桩基础工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhoupan0201@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42272310)。

Prediction method for load-settlement response of a single pile in sand based on an interface constitutive model

ZHOU Pan1, 2, LI Jing-pei1, 2, LI Pan-pan1, 2, LIU Geng-yun1, 2, ZHANG Chao-zhe3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2023-06-17 Accepted:2023-08-10 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272310).

摘要: 基于界面本构模型提出了一种新的砂土中单桩荷载沉降响应的预测方法。首先,从土−结构界面本构模型出发推导了严格的桩−土界面非线性荷载传递模型,该模型承继了界面本构模型特征,能够模拟桩−土界面上发生的应变硬化/软化、剪胀与应力路径依赖性等行为。此外,采用双曲线荷载传递模型模拟桩端−土相互作用的非线性应力−位移关系。上述荷载传递模型所需参数可以通过室内界面剪切试验和土工试验进行校准。继而,基于荷载传递法,提出了单桩荷载沉降响应分析的一维计算模型,并采用迭代算法进行数值求解。最后,将理论解答与已报道的模型试验、自主开展的模型桩试验以及数值模拟结果进行比较,以验证所提出的理论方法的正确性。试验结果表明,预测值与实测值吻合较好,且该方法能够很好地预测非位移桩与位移桩的荷载沉降响应。提出了一个基于界面本构模型的单桩荷载沉降响应分析框架,为竖向荷载下砂土中单桩优化设计提供了理论参考。

关键词: 单桩, 砂土, 荷载-沉降响应, 桩-土相互作用, 界面本构模型, 模型试验

Abstract: A novel method for predicting the load-settlement response of a single pile in sands is developed based on an interface constitutive model. Firstly, a rigorous nonlinear load-transfer model for the pile-soil interface is derived from the soil-structure interface constitutive model. This model incorporates the beneficial features of the adopted interface constitutive model and effectively simulates fundamental interface characteristics, such as strain hardening (or softening), normal shear dilation, and stress path dependency occurring at the pile-soil interface. Additionally, a hyperbolic load-transfer model is employed to simulate the nonlinear stress-displacement relationship between the pile end and soil. The parameters for the aforementioned load-transfer model can be calibrated through experimental interface shear tests and geotechnical experiments. Subsequently, a one-dimensional computational model for analyzing the load-settlement response of a single pile is proposed based on the load transfer method, with numerical solutions obtained using an iterative algorithm. Finally, the theoretical results are compared with reported and independently conducted model pile tests to validate the accuracy of the proposed theoretical approach. The experimental results show a good agreement between the predicted and measured values, demonstrating the method’s excellent capability in predicting the load-settlement response of both displacement and non-displacement piles. This paper presents an analytical framework based on the interface constitutive model for analyzing the load-settlement response of single piles, providing a theoretical reference for optimizing the design of pile foundations in sandy soils under vertical loads.

Key words: pile foundation, sand, load-settlement response, pile-soil interaction, interface constitutive model, model test

中图分类号: TU473.1
[1] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[5] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[6] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[7] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[8] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[9] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[10] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[11] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[12] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[13] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[14] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[15] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!