岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 1917-1928.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1228

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究

王智德1,钱梦凡1,李杰1, 2,司莹莹1,江俐敏3   

  1. 1.武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2.武汉市勘察设计有限公司,湖北 武汉,430000; 3.武汉职业技术学院 建筑工程学院 湖北 武汉,430074
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-15 接受日期:2023-11-13 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-07-18
  • 作者简介:王智德,男,1983年生,博士,高级实验师,硕士生导师,主要从事岩石爆破冲击方面的研究。E-mail: wangzhide-wuhan@whut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42077228,No. 51374163);磷资源开发利用教育部工程研究中心开放基金资助(No. LKF202004);武汉市城乡建设委员会科技计划项目(武城建[2017]12号-201740,武城建[2019]68号-201941)。

Damage mechanism of jointed granite under high strain rate impact loading

WANG Zhi-de1, QIAN Meng-fan1, LI Jie1, 2, SI Ying-ying1, JIANG Li-min3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; 2. Wuhan Geotechnical Engineering and Surveying Co. Ltd. Wuhan, Hubei 430000, China; 3. School of Architectural Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2023-08-15 Accepted:2023-11-13 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077228, 51374163), the Open Project of Engineering Research Center of Phosphorus Resources Development and Utilization of Ministry of Education (LKF202004) and the Science and Technology Program of Wuhan Municipal Urban-Rural Development Bureau ([2017] 12-201740, [2019] 68-201941).

摘要:

针对冲击荷载作用下贯通节理花岗岩动力响应特征和能量演化规律这一研究目标,以含不同倾角节理花岗岩为研究对象,基于不同倾角节理岩体损伤力学理论模型,开展了高应变率下不同节理倾角花岗岩的分离式霍普金森压杆(split Hopkinson pressure bar,简称SHPB)冲击试验,完成了高应变率下花岗岩的损伤特征研究,获取了岩体动态力学性质和能量耗散特征。研究结果表明:(1)基于Druck-Prager准则和Weibull 强度分布准则,结合弹性波理论,建立了不同倾角节理岩体的应力-应变理论模型,该模型能够较好地反映花岗岩的抗压强度、弹性模量随节理倾角变化的动态力学特性,具有较强的倾角效应;(2)相同冲击荷载下,随节理倾角的增大,能量反射系数呈线性上升趋势,能量传递系数呈线性下降趋势,岩样的峰值应力逐渐而减小;相同节理倾角下,随冲击荷载增大,能量反射系数先增大后减小,能量传递系数先减小再增大,能量吸收率随节理倾角的增大而减小;(3)当冲击荷载相同时,完整岩样、节理倾角θ =0°和θ =15°岩样的破碎程度较大,而节理倾角θ =30°和θ =45°岩样的破碎程度较小;当节理倾角相同时,随冲击荷载增大,超过岩样最大抗压强度时,岩样由剪切和拉伸破坏逐渐转化成压碎破坏,且破碎程度也随之增大。

关键词: 不同倾角, 节理花岗岩, SHPB冲击试验, 能量耗散, 高应变率

Abstract:

 To study the dynamic response characteristics and energy evolution of through-jointed granite under impact load, granite with different dip joints was selected as the research object. Using the theoretical model of damage mechanics for jointed rock masses with varying dip angles, a series of SHPB (split Hopkinson pressure bar) impact tests was conducted on granite samples under high strain rates. The dynamic mechanical properties and energy dissipation characteristics of the rock samples were obtained. The results indicate that: (1) based on the Druck-Prager criterion, the Weibull strength distribution criterion, and the theory of elastic waves, the stress-strain model of jointed rock mass with different dip angles is established. This model can effectively reflect the dynamic mechanical properties of granite as the joint dip angle changes and exhibits a strong dip effect. (2) As the dip angle of the joints increases, the energy reflection coefficient rises linearly, the energy transmission coefficient decreases linearly, and the peak stress of the rock samples gradually decreases. Under the same joint dip angle, as the impact load increases, the energy reflection coefficient first increases and then decreases, the energy transmission coefficient first decreases and then increases, and the energy absorption rate decreases with the increase of the joint dip angle. (3) When the impact load is the same, the fragmentation degree of intact rock samples and those with joint dip angles of 0° and 15° is greater, while the fragmentation degree of rock samples with joint dip angles of 30° and 45° is smaller. When the joint dip angle is the same, as the impact load increases and exceeds the maximum compressive strength of the rock samples, the failure mode gradually transitions from shear and tensile failure to crushing failure, and the degree of fragmentation also increases.

Key words: different dip angles, jointed granite, SHPB impact test, energy dissipation, high strain rate

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 邵国建, 毛泽辉, 苏宇宸, 焦泓程, 吕亚茹. 钙质砂透射系数探究:波形耦合作用及梯度提升预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[2] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[3] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[4] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[5] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[6] 贾鹏, 郤保平, 李晓科, 解瑾, 蔡佳豪, 高鹏利, . 花岗岩非稳态传热破坏过程能量演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3013-3023.
[7] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[8] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[9] 赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.
[10] 侯永强, 尹升华, 杨世兴, 张敏哲, 刘洪斌, . 动态荷载下胶结充填体力学响应及能量 损伤演化过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 145-156.
[11] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
[12] 马秋峰, 刘志河, 秦跃平, 田静, 王树立, . 基于能量耗散理论的岩石塑性-损伤本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1210-1220.
[13] 熊仲明, 吕世鸿, 李运良, 赵奇峰, 李进, 谭书舜, 张向荣, 朱玉荣, 姜磊, 杨琪凡, 张宁波, 张子栋. 被动围压下黄土动态力学性能与能量耗散研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 775-782.
[14] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[15] 马德鹏, 周岩, 刘传孝, 商岩冬, . 不同卸围压速率下煤样卸荷破坏能量演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2645-2652.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!