岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 1976-1986.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1231

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含水率对红层泥岩填料刚度劣化特性及微观结构影响研究

陈康1, 2, 3,刘先峰1, 2, 4,袁胜洋1, 2,马杰1, 2,陈忆涵1, 2,蒋关鲁1, 2   

  1. 1.西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;2.西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031; 3.加拿大皇家军事学院,金士顿 K7K7B4,加拿大;4.新疆工程学院 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830023
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-16 接受日期:2023-11-13 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 刘先峰,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊岩土力学及工程应用研究。E-mail: xianfeng.liu@swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈康,男,1995年生,博士,博士后,主要从事特殊土动力特性及工程应用研究。E-mail: kang-chen@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 52078432,No. 52168066);国家青年科学基金资助项目(No. 52008355);四川省科技计划项目(No. 2021YJ0036,No. 2021YFH0024);国家公派留学资助项目(No. 202207000096)。

Effect of water content on stiffness degradation and microstructure of red mudstone fill material

CHEN Kang1, 2, 3, LIU Xian-feng1, 2, 4, YUAN Sheng-yang1, 2, Ma Jie1, 2, CHEN Yi-han1, 2 JIANG Guan-lu1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston K7K7B4, Canada; 4. Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830023, China
  • Received:2023-08-16 Accepted:2023-11-13 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (52078432, 52168066), the Natural Youth Science Foundation of China (52008355), the Science and Technology Program of Sichuan (2021YJ0036, 2021YFH0024) and China Scholarship Council (CSC) (202207000096).

摘要: 为研究含水率对红层泥岩填料刚度劣化规律和微观结构的影响,开展了不同含水率下三轴不排水剪切试验、压汞试验和扫描电镜试验,基于能量守恒定律推导了填料刚度劣化与弹塑性应变能增量间的关系。结果表明:填料黏聚力随含水率增加而降低,内摩擦角则随含水率增加先增加后降低。填料结构损伤由应变能转化引起,从宏观上表现为刚度劣化。归一化刚度比值随塑性应变能增量占比增加而线性降低,随应力发展呈非线性衰减。以最优含水率为界,当试样在干侧时,填料有较好的荷载抵抗能力;湿侧填料荷载抵抗能力远低于干侧。损伤应力等值线与等含水率线构成上下界为对数曲线的状态面。填料孔隙分布在干侧为单峰形态,粒间接触较为紧密,结构稳定性好。在湿侧呈双峰结构,团聚体排列定向性程度较低。填料应在干侧压实填筑,推荐采用5%~7%作为填筑目标含水率。

关键词: 路基填料, 红层泥岩, 刚度劣化, 应变能, 微观结构。

Abstract: A series of undrained triaxial shear tests, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) tests, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tests were conducted on red mudstone fill material (RMF) at varying water contents to investigate its microstructure and stiffness degradation. Based on the principle of energy conservation, a relationship between the stiffness degradation of the fill material and the increment of elastoplastic strain energy was derived. The results show that the cohesion of RMF decreases with increased water content, while the internal friction angle initially increases and then decreases on the wet side. The evolution of strain energy leads to structural damage and subsequent stiffness degradation. The normalized stiffness ratio linearly decreases with the ratio of plastic strain energy to total strain energy and nonlinearly decreases with normalized shear stress. With optimal water content as the boundary, the RMF exhibits better load-bearing capacity on the dry side, while significantly lower on the wet side. The contours of damage stress and constant water content lines define a state boundary surface, whose upper and lower bounds follow logarithmic curves. The pore size distribution (PSD) of RMF on the dry side exhibits a uni-modal pattern with strong inter-aggregate contacts and good structural stability. On the wet side, however, a bi-modal structure is observed with weaker orientation of aggregates. It is recommended that the fill material be compacted on the dry side, with a target water content ranging from 5% to 7%.

Key words: subgrade fill material, red mudstone, stiffness degradation, strain energy, microstructure.

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[2] 于天佑, 蒋关鲁, 饶千竺, 朱丹, 陈虹羽, 刘先峰, . 水汽循环作用下红层泥岩的损伤劣化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 479-491.
[3] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[4] 汪淼, 任昊铭, 王凡超, 章定文, . 黏土含量对沿河公路路基抗冲刷性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 187-194.
[5] 余云燕, 丁小刚, 马丽娜, 崔文豪, 杜乾中. 微膨胀泥岩地基原位水分入渗响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 647-658.
[6] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 含水率对红层泥岩填料动力特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3705-3716.
[7] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[8] 程树范, 曾亚武, 叶阳, 高睿, . 甘肃红层泥岩耐崩解试验与矿物夹杂效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 99-106.
[9] 王旭超, 张莎莎, 赵凯旋, . 细粒土含量对粗粒硫酸盐渍土路基填料盐胀特性的影响试验及分析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2191-2202.
[10] 陈康, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 潘申鑫, 马杰, 蒋关鲁, . 饱和红层泥岩填料累积变形特性及安定界限研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1261-1268.
[11] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[12] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[13] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[14] 张 萍,杨春和,汪 虎,郭印同,徐 峰,侯振坤,. 页岩单轴压缩应力-应变特征及能量各向异性[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2106-2114.
[15] 谢学斌,李建坤,董宪久,田听雨,. 胶结充填体-顶板系统稳定性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4183-4190.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!