岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2000-2010.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1335

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

周期性孔隙水压作用下砂岩损伤劣化特性研究

李洪亚1,马林建1,刘杰2,李增1,邓家军1,许宏发1   

  1. 1.陆军工程大学 爆炸冲击防灾减灾全国重点实验室,江苏 南京210007;2.三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-16 接受日期:2023-12-01 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 马林建,男,1984年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岛礁岩土工程及防护工程方面的教学与研究。E-mail:Patton.4400@163.com
  • 作者简介:李洪亚,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事岛礁岩土工程及防护工程方面的研究。E-mail:LHY_lihongya@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金(No. 52222110);江苏省自然科学面上基金(No. BK20211230)。

Damage and deterioration characteristics of sandstone under cyclical pore water pressure

LI Hong-ya1, MA Lin-jian1, LIU Jie2, LI Zeng1, DENG Jia-jun1, XU Hong-fa1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Explosion and Impact, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210007, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2023-09-16 Accepted:2023-12-01 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Excellent Youth Program (52222110) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial(BK20211230)

摘要: 消落带砂岩由于受到周期性水压渗透的影响,其物理力学特性随时间损伤劣化,导致岸坡稳定性降低。开展了周期性孔隙水压力损伤砂岩的不排水三轴压缩试验,分析了砂岩强度、变形及脆性特征演化规律,讨论了细微观结构劣化机制。结果表明:砂岩峰值强度随着孔隙水压作用周次的增大而减小,且强度劣化度随围压增大逐渐降低。随着孔隙水压作用周次增大,黏聚力和内摩擦角分别呈现指数式衰减和线性衰减,其中黏聚力下降是强度劣化的主要原因。弹性模量、破坏应变和Tarasov脆性指数均随孔隙水压作用周次增大逐渐降低,而随围压增大具有明显增强效应。破坏模式由单斜面剪切破坏发展至共轭剪切破坏,破裂角由67.20°逐渐减小至62.05°。周期性孔隙水压作用在裂隙尖端导致的应力集中和应力疲劳加剧了砂岩内部结构劣化,且不排水压缩过程中的孔隙水压力的增长进一步加剧了砂岩的损伤劣化,而围压作用导致部分渗流通道闭合,降低了砂岩的渗流损伤。

关键词: 库岸边坡, 砂岩, 应力-渗流耦合, 周期性孔隙水压, 脆性指数, 损伤劣化

Abstract: Due to the influence of cycle water pressure permeation, the physical and mechanical properties of sandstone in the fluctuation zone deteriorate with time, which leads to a decrease in bank slope stability. Undrained triaxial compression tests were conducted on sandstone subjected to varying cycles of pore water pressure. The evolution of the deformation, strength, and brittleness index of sandstone were investigated, and the mechanisms of microstructural deterioration were discussed. The results show that the peak stress decreases with the increase of osmotic water pressure action cycle, and the strength degradation gradually decreases with the increase of confining pressure. With an increase in the number of cycles of pore water pressure, both cohesion and internal friction angle decrease exponentially and linearly, respectively, indicating that the decrease in cohesion is the primary cause of strength deterioration. The elastic modulus, failure strain and Tarasov brittleness index decrease gradually with the increase of pore water pressure action period, however there is a significant enhancement effect with increasing confining pressure. Moreover, the failure mode has evolved from single slope shear failure to conjugate shear failure, with the fracture angle decreasing from 67.2° to 62.05°. The stress concentration and stress fatigue caused by cyclical pore water pressure at the crack tip exacerbate the internal structural degradation of sandstone. Additionally, the increase in pore water pressure during undrained compression exacerbates the damage and degradation of the sandstone, while the confining pressure causes the closure of some seepage channels, reducing the seepage damage of sandstone.

Key words: reservoir slope, sandstone, stress-seepage coupling, cyclical pore water pressure, brittleness index, damage degradation

中图分类号: TU 441
[1] 秦立科, 郭瑞琦, 赵皓辰, 甄刚, 王琦, . 环境蒸发条件下石质文物毛细水动态分布规律影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 354-365.
[2] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[3] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[4] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[5] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[6] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[7] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[8] 吕志涛, 朱小宝, 罗嗣成, 夏才初, 曾祥太, . 砂岩多周期累积冻融变形特性及其微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 389-401.
[9] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[10] 杨松, 王俊光, 韦忠跟, 辛天宇, 梁冰, 王立轩, 任凌冉. 衰减振荡扰动下砂岩蠕变特性与模型初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3485-3500.
[11] 陈石, 呼怀刚, 胡大伟, 杨福见, 周辉, 周玉玲, . 岩芯自适应连续刻划试验技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3302-3314.
[12] 吴鹏, 陈健, 付晓东, 黄珏皓, . 循环荷载作用下干燥与饱和泥质粉砂岩变形特性及其能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 195-207.
[13] 杜金飞, 杜宇翔, 贾永胜, 孙金山, 姚颖康, 谢全民, 范焜晖, . 水−动力耦合作用下红砂岩变形破坏与能耗分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 248-258.
[14] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[15] 隆能增, 任松, 吴斐, 陈征, 陈国庆, 张平, 张闯, . 酸性干湿循环下泥质砂岩劣化及声发射演化特征识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2653-2668.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!