岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2187-2194.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0341

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土中吸力筒基础抗拔数值模拟研究: 系泊深度效应

季慧1,彭宇2,吴则祥3,涂冬媚4   

  1. 1.中国人民解放军32576部队,广东 广州 510110;2.香港理工大学 土木与环境工程学院,香港 999077; 3.温州大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 温州 325000;4.温州理工学院 建筑与土木工程学院,浙江 温州 325000
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-20 接受日期:2023-07-05 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-07-23
  • 通讯作者: 吴则祥,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土试验及数值等方面的研究。E-mail: zexiang.wu@wzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:季慧,女,1976年生,博士,主要从事岩土工程风险及多场耦合分析等方面的研究。E-mail: 1055901459@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    长三角科技创新共同体联合攻关专项(No.2022CSJGG1201);国家自然科学基金(No. 52178352)。

Numerical simulation of the uplift capacity of suction caisson foundation in sandy soil: effects of mooring depth

JI Hui1, PENG Yu2, WU Ze-xiang3, TU Dong-mei4   

  1. 1. People’s Liberation Army of China 32576, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510110, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China; 4. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Wenzhou university of technology, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
  • Received:2023-03-20 Accepted:2023-07-05 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Special Project for Scientific and Technological Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta (2022CSJGG1201) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178352).

摘要: 针对锚线斜拉作用下吸力筒与砂土相互作用的微观特征仍不清楚这一问题,采用离散元(discrete element method,简称DEM)-有限元(finite element method,简称FEM)耦合数值方法,从宏观到微观角度分析系泊点深度对吸力筒基础抗拔性能的影响。在建模中,采用FEM中有限元网格来模拟吸力筒,采用DEM中颗粒来模拟吸力筒周围砂土,并通过控制滚轴运动来模拟锚线的拉作用。结果表明:吸力筒的拉力-位移曲线存在峰值拉力,且与不同系泊点深度下吸力筒运动模式有密切关系;吸力筒旋转方向、拔出位移的反转临界系泊深度点位于吸力筒从顶部往下h = 66.7%深度附近(即吸力筒深度的2/3处,h为系泊深度)。此外,从颗粒尺度分析了土体变形及破坏行为,最终确定了吸力筒-颗粒土相互作用的破坏模式。研究结果表明,忽略锚线的系泊点深度将会导致误判吸力筒的承载能力及与土体的破坏模式。

关键词: 吸力筒, 抗拔, DEM-FEM耦合, 深度效应, 土体变形

Abstract: The micro-mechanisms of suction caisson-soil interaction under the action of inclined mooring lines remain unclear. In this study, a coupled discrete element method (DEM) and finite element method (FEM) was adopted to investigate this issue from macro- to micro-scales, with a focus on the influence of mooring depth. The sand particles were simulated by DEM, and the suction caisson was simulated by FEM. The mooring line tension was simulated by controlling the roller motion. The results revealed that the differences in the evolution of the force-displacement curves were attributed to the differences in the suction caisson motion modes at different mooring depths. The mooring depth differences caused significant differences in the vertical pull-out displacement, rotation angle, and deformation of the suction caisson. The critical reverse mooring depth point of suction caisson rotation direction and pull-out displacement is located near the depth of h = 66.7% from the top of the suction caisson (i.e., 2/3 of the suction caisson depth). Moreover, the deformation behavior of the soil was analyzed at the scale of particles, ultimately determining the failure mode of the interaction between the suction caisson and the particle soil. The study showed that neglecting the mooring depth of the mooring line may lead to a misjudgment of the bearing capacity of the suction caisson and the failure mode of the soil.

Key words: suction bucket, anti-pulling, coupled DEM-FEM, depth effect, soil deformation

中图分类号: O 451
[1] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[2] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[3] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[4] 颜然, 孔纲强, 于江华, . 砂土地基中钻进比对螺旋桩安装性能和抗拔承载性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1778-1788.
[5] 王长虹, 杨天笑, 马铖涛, 沈洋. 束浆挤扩钢管桩竖向抗拔承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 846-856.
[6] 朱克文, 俞剑, 黄茂松, . 饱和黏土中抗拔桩上限承载力分析及土塞效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1995-2004.
[7] 季雨坤, 王钦科, 赵国良, 张健, 马建林, . 斜坡上嵌岩抗拔桩竖向承载变形特性模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1604-1614.
[8] 张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 王柳月, . 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[9] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[10] 李雨婷, 陈晓斌, 何鹏鹏, . 砂土中海上锚板抗拔极限状态的可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3495-3500.
[11] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[12] 王心博, 王路君, 朱斌, 王鹏, 袁思敏, 陈云敏, . 水合物储层伺服降压开采模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[13] 朱鸿鹄, 高宇新, 李元海, 倪钰菲, . 土工格栅加筋砂土中水平锚板抗拔特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1207-1214.
[14] 周航, 余昊, 曾少华, . 饱和黏土中螺旋桩安装效应对抗拔承载力影响 的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3249-3258.
[15] ALIREZA Beyranvand, SEYED HAMID Lajevardi, MAHMOUD Ghazavi, SEYED MOHAMMAD Mirhosseini, . 细砂中钢带-填土废塑料瓶抗拔性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3073-3082.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!