岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2263-2278.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1531

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

压缩空气储能人工硐库热力耦合解析方法研究

贾宁,刘顺,王洪播   

  1. 中国电力工程顾问集团华北电力设计院有限公司,北京 100120
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-11 接受日期:2024-01-04 出版日期:2024-08-10 发布日期:2024-08-12
  • 作者简介:贾宁,男,1975年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程技术研究。E-mail: jianing999@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    中国电力工程顾问集团有限公司2022年重大科技专项(No. DG3-J02-2022)

Analytical methods for thermo-mechanical coupling of artificial caverns of the compressed air energy storage

JIA Ning, LIU Shun, WANG Hong-bo   

  1. North China Power Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Beijing 100120, China
  • Received:2023-10-11 Accepted:2024-01-04 Online:2024-08-10 Published:2024-08-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Science and Technology Projects of China Power Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd. 2022 (DG3-J02-2022).

摘要: 压缩空气储能人工硐库在充气和抽气循环过程中,空气温度、压力,以及硐壁密封层、混凝土衬砌和围岩的温度、应力和应变一直处于变化之中。联合求解这些变量是工程设计中的关键技术,也是理论分析的难点。在一维热传导基本解和人工硐库空气温度基本解的基础上,基于硐壁对流换热和热传导能量守恒,提出人工硐库内空气热力学计算与硐壁热传导的耦合解析方法。与数值模拟结果进行了对比,验证了所提方法的正确性。对一个钢质密封层人工硐库实例进行了分析。结果表明,充抽气过程引起硐库内空气温度的剧烈变化,空气压力变幅明显大于基于恒温假定得到的压力变化结果。硐壁温度周期波动影响深度有限,当混凝土衬砌厚度大于周期波动影响范围后,围岩温度以持续升高直至稳定为特征,围岩强度和稳定性分析可以不考虑周期循环温度的影响。密封层受温度和空气内压双重作用明显,密封层设计需考虑材料的热机械疲劳问题。混凝土衬砌内外表面环向应力和法向应变特征差异巨大,不同工况下内外表面环向应力可能接近混凝土材料的抗压和抗拉强度,混凝土材料的抗压和抗拉强度同为设计的控制因素。混凝土衬砌可以减小围岩压力,但作用有限。在适当的埋深条件下,选择适当的充气压力,可以保证围岩处于弹性状态。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 内衬硐库, 解析方法, 温度, 气体内压, 应力, 应变

Abstract: The air temperature, pressure, as well as the temperature, stress, and strain of the sealing layer, concrete liner, and surrounding rock in the compressed air energy storage artificial cavern undergo variations during the inflation and extraction cycles. Jointly solving these variables is a key technique in engineering design and a difficulty in theoretical analysis. This article proposes a coupling calculation method between the thermodynamic of air inside the artificial cavern and the thermal conduction of the cavern wall, based on the one-dimensional basic solution of heat conduction and the basic solution of air temperature in the artificial cavern. The validity of the methodology was confirmed through a rigorous comparison with numerical simulation outcomes. An illustrative case study of a steel-sealed cavern was conducted. The findings reveal that the process of inflating and extracting air within the cavern leads to a substantial variation in air temperature, with the amplitude of pressure fluctuations exceeding those predicted under the assumption of constant temperature. The depth of the tunnel wall is minimally affected by periodic temperature fluctuations. Once the thickness of the concrete lining surpasses the influence range of periodic temperature fluctuations, the temperature of the adjacent rock mass gradually increases until it reaches a stable state. The analysis of the strength and stability of the surrounding rock can be proceed without considering the influence of periodic temperature fluctuations. The sealing layer is significantly affected by the dual effects of temperature and air internal pressure, necessitating the consideration of thermal-mechanical fatigue in its design. The characteristics of hoop stress and radial strain exhibit notable disparities between the inner and outer surfaces of concrete lining. Depending on the working conditions, the hoop stress on the inner and outer surfaces may approach the compressive and tensile strengths of concrete, both of which are crucial design considerations. Concrete lining mitigates the pressure of surrounding rock, albeit with limited effectiveness. At an appropriate burial depth, selecting the appropriate inflation pressure ensures that the surrounding rock remains in an elastic state.

Key words: compressed air energy storage(CAES), lined rock cavern(LRC), analytical approach, temperature, air pressure, stress, strain

中图分类号: TU 45
[1] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[2] 张治国, 李乃义, 牛瑞, 王安源, 朱正国, . 考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道应力与位移复变函数解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 141-158.
[3] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[4] 金解放, 熊慧颖, 肖莜丰, 彭孝旺. 岩石超声波对三维地应力的敏感性及传播衰减特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 183-194.
[5] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[6] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[7] 许江, 李艾峰, 彭守建, 陈奕安, 汤杨, 侯亚彬, 罗利威, . 基于广义应力松弛特性的岩石时效性数值模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2943-2954.
[8] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[9] 刘雯, 范金洋, 刘文浩, 陈结, 刘伟, 吴斐, . 气压-应力耦合作用下盐岩应力松弛特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2434-2448.
[10] 唐梅荣, 张广清, 张敏, . 多水平井立体化水力压裂缝网空间分布特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2449-2458.
[11] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[12] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[13] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[14] 吴嘉园, 王华宁, 宋飞, 胡韬, 蒋明镜, . 考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2121-2134.
[15] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!