岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2338-2350.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1488

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

反压诱导有效应力增生模式与土体强度关联机制研究

李永强1, 2,许言1,陈波1,熊健辉1,卢玢宇1, 3, 4   

  1. 1. 东华理工大学 土木与建筑工程学院,江西 南昌 330013;2. 南昌市应急管理局,江西 南昌 330038; 3. 东华理工大学 水资源与环境工程学院,江西 南昌 330013;4. 东华理工大学 江西省地质环境与地下空间工程研究中心,江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-01 接受日期:2024-01-19 出版日期:2024-08-10 发布日期:2024-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 卢玢宇,女,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事环境岩土工程与特殊土应用方面的研究。E-mail: lubinyu2004@163.com
  • 作者简介:李永强,男,1983年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土弹塑性本构模型建模方面的研究。E-mail: lyqiem@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江西省自然科学基金(No. 20202BABL204064);国家自然科学基金(No. 52068002);江西省“双千计划”(No. DHSQT32022006, JXSQ2020101041);江西省地质环境与地下空间工程研究中心开放基金(No. JXDHJJ2022-008)。

Correlation mechanism between effective stress variation mode induced by back pressure and soil strength

LI Yong-qiang1, 2, XU Yan1, CHEN Bo1, XIONG Jian-hui1, LU Bin-yu1, 3, 4   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 2. Nanchang Emergency Management Bureau, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330038, China; 3. School of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 4. Engineering Research Center for Geological Environment and Underground Space of Jiangxi Province, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
  • Received:2023-10-01 Accepted:2024-01-19 Online:2024-08-10 Published:2024-08-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20202BABL204064), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52068002), the Jiangxi “Double Thousand Plan” Project (DHSQT32022006, JXSQ2020101041) and the Open Fund from Engineering Research Center for Geological Environment and Underground Space of Jiangxi Province (JXDHJJ2022-008).

摘要:

反压施加是提高土体饱和度的常用有效方法,但易引起土体强度参数表观偏离。采用标准球形玻璃珠砂,开展基准固结不排水(consolidated undrain,CU),固结排水(consolidated drained,CD)及干样试验,对偏应力与孔压(或体积应变)数据进行实时精准测记与对比分析,借助p'-q应力路径图,显著呈现并定量分析了反压施加对土体力学特性的影响规律,初步厘清了反压施加对土体强度的影响机制。反压设置对CU试验结果影响显著,孔压发展形态控制着偏应力发展的形态,最终影响强度参数的确定,但应力路径始终约束在修正类剑桥模型的框架范围内。孔压发展模式和速率主要受限于反压设置大小及试样相对密实度,反压越大,孔压潜在变化幅度越大,进而导致偏应力变化区间增大;相对密实度越大,孔压发展速率越大,偏应力增速渐大。初始状态相同时,CU试验孔压发展与CD试验体积应变发展趋势高度一致,展示了试样体积应变势在不同边界条件下的共同本质。初步给出了临界状态时CU残余强度定量预测公式,根据相对密实度及反压值可初步定量评定残余孔压值,进而可确定CU残余强度。

关键词: 反压;偏应力;固结不排水(consolidated undrain, CU)强度;有效应力路径;球形玻璃砂

Abstract:

The back pressure saturation method, a widely adopted and efficient technique for enhancing soil saturation, can nonetheless introduce notable deviations in soil strength parameters. Standard spherical glass bead sand was utilized for conducting benchmark consolidated undrained (CU), consolidated drained (CD), and dry sample tests. Real-time accurate measurements and comparative analyses of deviatoric stress and pore pressure (or volumetric deformation) data were performed. Utilizing the p'-q stress path diagram, the influence of back pressure application on soil mechanical properties was significantly demonstrated and quantitatively analyzed, thereby preliminarily elucidating the mechanism of back pressure influence. The setting of back pressure significantly impacts the results of CU tests, where the shape of pore pressure development governs the shape of deviatoric stress development, ultimately influencing the determination of strength parameters. However, the stress path remains constrained within the framework of the revised Cam-Clay model. The mode and rate of pore pressure development are primarily constrained by the magnitude of the back pressure setting and the relative density of the sample. As back pressure increases, the potential change in pore pressure also increases, resulting in a greater amplitude of deviatoric stress change. Similarly, a higher relative density leads to a faster development rate of pore pressure and an increased rate of deviatoric stress. Under identical initial conditions, the development of pore pressure in CU tests exhibits high consistency with the development of volume deformation in CD tests, revealing the common essence of the sample’s volumetric deformation potential across different boundary conditions. A quantitative prediction formula for the residual strength of CU tests at the critical state is presented. The residual pore pressure value can be initially quantified based on the relative density and back pressure measurements, subsequently leading to the determination of the residual strength of CU.

Key words: back pressure, deviatoric stress, consolidated undrain (CU) strength, effective stress path, spherical glass sand

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 潘超钒, 张晨, 张星星, 蔡正银, 王旭东, . 盐渍化粉土的蠕变特征及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3383-3394.
[2] 邵国建, 毛泽辉, 苏宇宸, 焦泓程, 吕亚茹. 钙质砂透射系数探究:波形耦合作用及梯度提升预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[3] 杜常博, 张程玮, 梁冰, 易富, 张相国, 李江山, 孙琦, 黄惠杰, . 壳聚糖协同EICP固化/稳定化石墨尾矿性能及机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3143-3156.
[4] 刘孜涵, 赵国成, 肖龙飞, . 深海沉积物对多金属结核矿粒黏附特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3167-3174.
[5] 刘先珊, 孙梦, 郑志伟, 熊振瑀, 于明智, 曹伊婷, 宋昱霖, 黄子宣, . 复杂孔隙介质两相驱替模式及驱替效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2363-2375.
[6] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[7] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[8] 陈嘉瑞, 樊宝云, 叶剑红, 张春顺, . 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性及破碎演化模型三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2095-2105.
[9] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[10] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[11] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[12] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[13] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[14] 吴林玉, 缪林昌, 孙潇昊, . 聚丙烯酰胺对酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀固沙效果影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1573-1580.
[15] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!