岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 106-114.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0276

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法

刘吉福   

  1. 广东省交通规划设计研究院集团股份有限公司,广东 广州 510507
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-04 接受日期:2023-06-19 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-18
  • 作者简介:刘吉福,男,1971年生,博士,教授级高工,主要从事软土地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: 617067152@qq.com

A new method for analyzing stability of drainage consolidation embankments

LIU Ji-fu   

  1. Guangdong Communication Planning & Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Gungdong 510507, China
  • Received:2023-03-04 Accepted:2023-06-19 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-18

摘要: 因滑动面上的有效应力难以确定,有效应力法很少应用;而有效固结应力法计算的稳定安全系数偏小,需要研究排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法。基于软基模型试验位移场中的滑动面,将排水固结堤坝的滑动体分为主动剪切区、直接剪切区、被动剪切区。对主动和被动剪切区,利用斯开普顿公式、摩尔−库仑强度准则推导得到滑动面上的法向有效应力;对直剪区,利用斯开普顿孔压公式计算主应力增量产生的孔压,根据剪切破坏面上的剪应力增量与抗剪强度相等的原则,推导得到滑动面上的法向有效应力;然后,推导得到以竖向有效固结应力为变量、由有效抗剪指标和孔压系数组成强度系数的抗剪强度公式;最后,利用上述抗剪强度公式提出了排水固结堤坝稳定分析方法——强度系数法。计算表明,相对三区摩擦抗剪强度系数的平均值,沈珠江方法的误差为−7%~7%,规范方法偏小20%~25%,十字板试验偏小20%~31%。对运营公路排水固结路堤的稳定分析表明,规范方法计算的稳定安全系数小于1,强度系数法和沈珠江方法计算结果与工程实际情况符合性较好。

关键词: 路基, 强度系数法, 抗剪强度, 稳定分析, 排水固结, 有效固结应力法, 有效应力法

Abstract: The effective stress method is seldom utilized due to the complexity of calculating effective stress along the sliding surface. The stability factor calculated by the effective consolidation-stress method is underestimated. A novel stability analysis method for consolidation embankments needs to be developed. The sliding body of a consolidation embankment was categorized into active shear zone, direct shear zone, and passive shear zone based on the sliding surfaces in the deformation fields of a model experiment on soft ground. The effective normal stress on the sliding surface in the active or passive zone was calculated using the Skempton equation and the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion. The effective normal stress on the sliding surface in the direct shear zone was determined after considering the excess pore water pressure using the Skempton equation and following the principle that the increment of shear stress equals the shear strength on the failure surface. Equations for the shear strength on the failure surface, with the vertical consolidation stress as the variable and the strength coefficients composed of shear strength indexes and the coefficient of excess pore water pressure, were developed. Finally, the strength coefficient method was proposed as a new stability analysis approach for consolidation embankments based on the shear strength equations mentioned above. The study reveals that the average error in the coefficient of frictional shear strength across three zones, as determined in this paper compared to the method suggested by Shen Zhu-jiang, ranges from −7% to 7%. Furthermore, the coefficient obtained from the current code is 20% to 25% lower than that derived in this paper, and the coefficient from the vane test is 20% to 31% lower. The stability analysis of a consolidation embankment on an operational express highway demonstrates that the stability factor from the current code’s method is below 1. Both the strength coefficient method and the approach proposed by Shen Zhu-jiang align well with the engineering principles.

Key words: embankment, strength coefficient method, shear strength, stability analysis, consolidation, effective consolidation stress method, effective stress method

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[5] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[6] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[7] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[8] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[9] 张玲, 彭搏程, 徐泽宇, 赵明华, . 基于桩身弯曲破坏的路堤下筋箍碎石桩复合地基稳定分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 413-421.
[10] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[11] 卢正, 李梦威, 唐楚轩, 胡智, 赵阳, 则志辉, 姚海林, . 考虑不同级配影响的填石路基压实质量评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3346-3354.
[12] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[13] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[14] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[15] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!