岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 382-390.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0524

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究

孙旻洋1,王忠瑾2,谢新宇1,张日红4,娄扬1,朱大勇2, 3   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙大宁波理工学院 土木建筑工程学院,浙江 宁波 315100; 3. 浙江大学 宁波研究院,浙江 宁波 315100;4. 宁波中淳高科股份有限公司,浙江 宁波 315100
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-27 接受日期:2023-06-12 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 王忠瑾,男,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事桩基工程、基础工程、能源桩等方面的研究。E-mail: zhongjin_wang@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孙旻洋,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事能源桩承载特性方面的研究。E-mail: 22012198@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    宁波市青年科技创新领军人才项目(No.2023QL018);国家自然科学基金(No.52478365,No.51708496)

Model test on thermal-mechanical characteristics of energy pile groups in saturated clay

SUN Min-yang1, WANG Zhong-jin2, XIE Xin-yu1, ZHANG Ri-hong4, LOU Yang1, ZHU Da-yong2, 3   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 3. Ningbo Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 4. ZCONE High-Tech Pile Industry Holdings Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China
  • Received:2023-04-27 Accepted:2023-06-12 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Ningbo Youth Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talent Project (2023QL018) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478365, 51708496).

摘要: 为研究饱和黏土地基中静钻根植能源群桩不同运行方式的热力特性,采用自行设计的模型试验系统,测试温度条件下模型单桩和群桩的热力响应。通过埋置传感测试元件,得到桩顶位移、桩身应力、桩和桩周土温度、桩周水平土压力及孔隙水压力。结果表明:由于桩间热扩散,加热桩会对周围非加热桩造成影响,导致非加热桩桩身温度增加、桩顶位移上升,能源群桩的平均换热性能较单桩低;制冷工况下群桩的桩顶位移变化绝对值大于加热工况,需要考虑以确保安全性;由于群桩效应,与单桩相比,能源群桩桩顶位移变化更大,桩身附加温度应力更小;能源群桩的热力特性受运行能源桩数量影响,运行数量越多,温度对能源群桩的热力特性影响越显著,桩周土压力、孔隙水压力变化值越大。

关键词: 静钻根植能源桩, 附加温度应力, 模型试验, 热-力耦合, 承载特性

Abstract: In order to study the thermal characteristics of pre-bored grouted planted energy pile groups in saturated clay foundation under different operation modes, a self-designed model test system is used to examine the thermal response of single pile and pile group. By embedding sensing test elements, data on pile top displacement, pile stress, pile and surrounding soil temperatures, horizontal soil pressure, and pore water pressure are collected. Findings show that the heated pile influences adjacent unheated piles through thermal diffusion, leading to increased pile body temperature and top displacement. Moreover, the overall heat transfer efficiency of energy pile groups is lower than that of single piles. The absolute displacement change at the pile top in energy pile groups is greater under cooling conditions than under heating conditions, necessitating safety considerations. The group effect results in larger pile top displacements and lower additional thermal stresses in energy pile groups compared to single piles. Furthermore, as the number of energy piles in a group increases, the thermal characteristics become more pronounced, accompanied by greater variations in horizontal soil pressure and pore water pressure around the piles.

Key words: pre-bored grouted planted energy pile, the additional thermal stress, model test, thermo-mechanical coupling, bearing characteristic

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!