岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 165-177.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0340

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制

郑可跃1,2,施成华1, 2, 3,娄义黎1, 2,贾朝军1, 2,雷明锋1, 2,杨益1, 2   

  1. 1.高速铁路建造技术国家工程研究中心,湖南 长沙 410075;2.中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075; 3.中国中铁股份有限公司,北京 100039
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-21 接受日期:2024-06-20 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 施成华,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事复杂地质环境隧道灾变机制及建造技术的研究。E-mail:csusch@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑可跃,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事软岩大变形隧道灾变机制及控制技术的研究。E-mail:Zkycsu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.52478425, No.52178402);中国中铁股份有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(2021-重点-09, 2022-重点-10)。

Calculation method and evolution mechanism of surrounding rock energy during excavation unloading of deep tunnels in high in-situ stress field

ZHENG Ke-yue1, 2, SHI Cheng-hua1, 2, 3, LOU Yi-li1, 2, JIA Chao-jun1, 2, LEI Ming-feng1,2, YANG Yi1, 2   

  1. 1. National Engineering Research Center of High-speed Railway Construction Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 3. China Railway Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China
  • Received:2024-03-21 Accepted:2024-06-20 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478425, 52178402) and the Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of China Railway Group Limited (2021–Key–09, 2022-Key-10).

摘要: 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷后围岩的变形破坏过程受能量的驱动,其本质是输入能超出围岩储能极限后耗散和释放的结果。既有的理论研究主要针对弹性卸载条件下深部圆形隧(巷)道围岩弹性应变能的计算,很少有学者对弹塑性卸载下深部圆形隧道围岩的能量计算和能量演化开展理论研究。首先根据岩石的能量演化过程,明确了弹性应变能、塑性耗散能和塑性释放能的定义;然后基于弹塑性理论和Hoek-Brown强度准则,考虑岩石的峰后应变软化特性,提出半径增量法计算围岩的卸荷应力路径;最终,建立了基于卸荷应力路径的深部圆形隧道围岩能量计算方法。基于能量守恒定律验证了计算方法的正确性,并分析了不同峰值强度下深部圆形隧道围岩的能量演化机制。研究结果表明:隧道开挖后能量从远处围岩输入,弹性阶段输入能全部转化弹性应变能,越靠近隧道洞壁弹性应变能密度越大。塑性阶段能量持续输入,弹性应变总能继续增大,但靠近洞壁的围岩达到储能极限,产生塑性区,且受应变软化行为影响,塑性区的储能极限降低,围岩的耗散能和释放能呈指数增加;峰值强度越大的深部岩体,在高地应力环境下开挖后以能量释放为主,硬岩岩爆源于能量释放机制。对于峰值强度低的深部软岩,在高地应力环境下开挖后以能量耗散为主,软岩挤压大变形源于能量耗散机制。

关键词: 深部隧道, 卸荷应力路径, 能量演化, 能量耗散, 能量释放

Abstract: The deformation and failure of deep tunnels in a high in-situ stress field are driven by energy, which results from the dissipation and release of energy exceeding the storage limit in the surrounding rock. Existing theoretical studies mainly focus on calculating the elastic strain energy of the surrounding rock during the elastic unloading of deep circular tunnels. Few authors have conducted theoretical research on energy calculation and evolution in deep circular tunnels under elastic-plastic unloading. Firstly, this study clarifies the definitions of elastic strain energy, dissipated energy, and released energy based on the energy evolution of rocks. Subsequently, utilizing elastic-plasticity theory and Hoek-Brown strength criteria, the radius increment method is proposed to calculate the unloading stress path of the surrounding rock, taking into account strain-softening behavior. Finally, an energy calculation method for deep circular rock tunnels based on the unloading stress path is established, mathematically proving the energy conservation relationship of the surrounding rock. The research results indicate that energy is input from the remote surrounding rock after tunnel excavation. During the elastic deformation phase, input energy is all converted into elastic strain energy, with higher elastic strain energy density closer to the tunnel wall. In the plastic deformation stage, the total elastic strain energy continues to increase with ongoing energy input. However, the elastic strain energy density near the tunnel reaches the energy storage limit of the surrounding rock, leading to a plastic zone. Subsequently, the energy storage limit in the plastic zone decreases due to strain softening behavior, resulting in an exponential increase in the dissipated and released energy of the surrounding rock. For deep rocks with high peak strength, energy release dominates during plastic deformation, leading to rockbursts caused by the energy release mechanism. Rocks with low peak strength exhibit plastic deformation primarily driven by energy dissipation, leading to the initiation of tunnel squeezing deformation.

Key words: deep tunnel, unloading stress path, energy evolution, dissipated energy, released energy

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[2] 王成, 李起航, 王春, 任雨蒙, 李润泽. 含内套环储能花岗岩单一径向压缩下的力学特性及能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3694-3706.
[3] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[4] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[5] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[6] 刘晓裴, 江权, 李邵军, 辛杰, 陈朋飞, . 循环加卸载下大理岩渐进损伤的能量特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2373-2386.
[7] 汪文瑞, 张广清, 孙伟, 李帅, 曹虎, 李祖亮, . 岩性差异对裂缝穿层扩展的率相关断裂特征影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2311-2323.
[8] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[9] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
[10] 张培森, 许大强, 颜伟, 张晓乐, 董宇航, 赵铭, . 应力-渗流耦合作用下不同卸荷路径对砂岩损伤特性及能量演化规律的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 325-339.
[11] 贾鹏, 郤保平, 李晓科, 解瑾, 蔡佳豪, 高鹏利, . 花岗岩非稳态传热破坏过程能量演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3013-3023.
[12] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[13] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[14] 赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.
[15] 于洋, 王泽华, 唐才萱. 单轴压缩下酸腐蚀花岗岩能量演化与分形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1971-1982.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!