岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 43-54.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0385

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究

陈康1, 2,刘先峰1, 2,蒋关鲁1, 2,袁胜洋1, 2,马杰1, 2,陈忆涵1, 2   

  1. 1.西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;2.西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-31 接受日期:2024-05-08 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 刘先峰,1980年生,男,博士,教授,主要从事特殊岩土力学及工程应用研究。E-mail: Xianfeng.liu@swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈康,1995年生,男,博士,博士后,主要从事特殊土动力特性及工程应用研究。E-mail: kang-chen@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.52078432,No.52168066,No.52378463);国家公派留学资助项目(No.202207000096)

Degradation on mechanical properties of lime-treated red mudstone fill material subjected to wetting-drying cycles

CHEN Kang1, 2, LIU Xian-feng1, 2, JIANG Guan-lu1, 2, YUAN Sheng-yang1, 2, MA Jie1, 2, CHEN Yi-han1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. .School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2024-03-31 Accepted:2024-05-08 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (52078432, 52168066, 52378463) and China Scholarship Council Project(CSC) (202207000096).

摘要: 红层泥岩水敏性高,作路基填料时可用石灰改良。受季节变化影响,路基基床经历干湿循环,导致服役性能降低。为研究干湿循环下改良填料力学特性劣化规律,开展一系列干湿循环试验、无侧限抗压试验和弯曲元试验测定改良填料无侧限抗压强度和小应变刚度。结合连续滴水扫描电镜(scanning electron microscope,简称SEM)试验,揭示干湿循环后填料微观结构劣化特征。结果表明:低幅度循环下试样在干侧和湿侧均产生体胀。高幅度循环下试样在湿侧产生体胀。在干侧先产生体缩,随循环次数增加,即使含水率较低,试样也产生体胀。体胀导致强度和小应变刚度均有不同程度的劣化。当试样产生体缩时,强度有所增长,但小应变刚度由于裂缝衍生而持续衰减。试样强度随损伤体变可用统一劣化方程表示。但高幅度循环下试样干燥后的小应变刚度远低于劣化线,且劣化速率远大于强度。试样滴水后能维持基本形貌,但观察到团聚体松散、微粒剥落和新生裂缝等结构劣化特征,从而导致宏观力学性能衰减。

关键词: 路基填料, 干湿循环, 石灰改良, 红层泥岩, 性能劣化

Abstract: Red mudstone is highly sensitive to water content variations. Lime treatment is recommended when using red mudstone as subgrade fill material. The mechanical properties of lime-treated red mudstone fill material (LRMF) degrade due to wetting-drying (WD) cycles caused by seasonal environmental effects. A series of WD cycle tests, unconfined compression tests, and bender element tests were conducted to investigate the degradation of strength and small strain stiffness of LRMF. Combining with the successive water-dripping scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests, the microstructure disturbance of LRMF after WD cycles was examined. Swelling of specimens on both the wet and dry sides was observed during low-amplitude WD cycles. For high-amplitude WD cycles, swelling on the wet side was also observed. On the dry side, initial volume shrinkage was recorded, followed by swelling in successive cycles, even though the water content was significantly lower than the initial state. Swelling results in the degradation of strength and small strain stiffness. Volumetric shrinkage increased strength, but small strain stiffness was still reduced due to crack propagation. A unified model is proposed to identify the degradation of strength and volumetric strain, while the small strain stiffness for dry specimens under large-amplitude WD cycles is significantly below the degradation line. The degradation rate of small strain stiffness is significantly higher than that of strength. After water exposure, the LRMF generally retains its initial microstructure. However, loosened aggregates, slaking, and crack propagation are clearly seen in water-exposed specimens. Degradation of the mechanical properties of LRMF can be attributed to damage to the soil fabric.

Key words: subgrade fill material, wetting-drying cycles, lime treatment, red mudstone, degradation

中图分类号: TD 411
[1] 孟佳佳, 吴益平, 晏鄂川, 汪洋. 基于荷载-干湿循环耦合试验的三峡库区石龙门滑坡滑带土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1511-1520.
[2] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[3] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[4] 薛钦培, 陈宏信, 冯世进, 刘晓轩, 谢伟, . 干湿循环作用下地聚物隔离墙材料渗透特性演化及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 811-820.
[5] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[6] 于天佑, 蒋关鲁, 饶千竺, 朱丹, 陈虹羽, 刘先峰, . 水汽循环作用下红层泥岩的损伤劣化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 479-491.
[7] 刘畅, 代丽媛, 李彪, 童富果, 田斌, 周铨. 干湿循环作用下宽饱和度范围红壤土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3811-3822.
[8] 王杰, 李冲, 刘磊, 丁阔, . 干湿循环下泥岩变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3132-3142.
[9] 汪淼, 任昊铭, 王凡超, 章定文, . 黏土含量对沿河公路路基抗冲刷性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 187-194.
[10] 程家林, 张贵科, 邓韶辉, 黄习文, 周伟, 马刚, . 干湿循环对不同粒径堆石颗粒破碎强度的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 95-105.
[11] 郭建华, 王汉辉, 李世昌, 戴张俊, . 干湿环境下膨胀土裂隙演化规律及渠坡变形研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 433-442.
[12] 王辉, 钮新强, 马刚, 周伟, . 干湿循环作用下堆石料宏细观力学特性的离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
[13] 隆能增, 任松, 吴斐, 陈征, 陈国庆, 张平, 张闯, . 酸性干湿循环下泥质砂岩劣化及声发射演化特征识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2653-2668.
[14] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[15] 陈康, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, 蒋关鲁, . 含水率对红层泥岩填料刚度劣化特性及微观结构影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1976-1986.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!