岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3208-3218.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1567CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1567

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

压气储能地下洞室二衬预设缝参数优化研究

张世殊1,徐国庆2,夏才初3, 4,王升3, 4   

  1. 1.中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都,610072;2.绍兴文理学院 土木工程学院,浙江 绍兴 312000; 3.宁波大学 岩石力学研究所,浙江 宁波 315211;4.宁波大学 宁波市能源地下结构重点实验室,浙江 宁波,315211
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-20 接受日期:2025-02-26 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-13
  • 通讯作者: 夏才初,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究。E-mail: tjxiaccb@126.com
  • 作者简介:张世殊,男,1970年生,博士,正高级工程师,从事水电工程勘察及工程地质信息化一体化等方面的研究工作。 E-mail: 1992070@chidi.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划政府间重点专项(No.2024YFE0105800);国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金重点项目(No.U23B20145);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52278402);中国电建集团核心攻关项目(No.DJ-HXGG-2023-09)

Optimization of preset crack parameters of secondary lining concrete in compressed air energy storage chamber

ZHANG Shi-shu1, XU Guo-qing2, XIA Cai-chu3, 4, WANG Sheng3, 4   

  1. 1. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University of Arts and Sciences, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China; 3. Institute of Rock Mechanics, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 4. Ningbo Key Laboratory of Energy Geostructure, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China
  • Received:2024-12-20 Accepted:2025-02-26 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Intergovernmental Key Project of National Key R & D Plan (2024YFE0105800), the Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China Joint Fund for Enterprise Innovation and Development (U23B20145), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278402) and the Core Research Project of China Power Construction Group (DJ-HXGG-2023-09).

摘要: 压气储能内衬地下洞室的混凝土衬砌在高内压下容易产生较宽的裂缝,导致裂缝宽度超出安全设计值,从而影响衬砌的安全。为应对这一问题,通常需要减小截面尺寸、增加衬砌配筋率和缩减储气压力,这不仅显著增加建设成本,也限制了储气能力。为此,采用了一种通过释放衬砌环向位移来减小拉应力的预设缝衬砌结构,该结构可以提高围岩对衬砌的抗力,从而可以让围岩承担更多的荷载,充分发挥围岩自承载能力。依托实际工程建立了不同预设缝深度、位置和数量的二维数值模型,通过分析衬砌损伤因子和钢筋应力分布提出了最优的预设缝衬砌设计方案。研究结果表明:为有效释放衬砌应力,预设缝需贯通并切断钢筋;预设缝衬砌结构能够有效减少衬砌损伤和钢筋应力,尤其在接缝处15°范围内效果最为明显;应对称设置预设缝,以避免影响范围重叠导致远端钢筋应力增大;增加预设缝数量可缓解接缝处远端衬砌损伤;考虑到预设缝数量的增多会增加施工成本和难度且会降低衬砌本身的质量,在满足衬砌设计要求的情况下,当侧压力系数为0.39时预设6条贯通的对称缝是最优方案,当侧压力系数为1.5时预设4条贯通的对称缝是最优方案。

关键词: 压气储能, 内衬式地下洞室, 裂缝宽度, 预设缝衬砌

Abstract: The concrete lining of underground caverns used for compressed gas energy storage is prone to wide cracks under high internal pressure, which can exceed safety design values and affect the safety of the lining. To address this problem, it is usually necessary to reduce the cross-sectional size, increase the lining reinforcement ratio and reduce the gas storage pressure, which raises construction costs and limits storage capacity. This study adopts a preset crack lining structure that reduces tensile stress by releasing the circumferential displacement of the lining. This structure enhances the resistance of the surrounding rock to the lining, so that the surrounding rock can bear more loads and fully utilize its self-bearing capacity. Relying on actual projects, a two-dimensional numerical model was established with different preset crack depths, positions and numbers. The optimal design scheme for preset crack lining was proposed by analyzing lining damage factor and steel bar stress distribution. The results show that: to effectively release the lining stress, preset cracks must penetrate and sever steel bars. The preset crack lining structure significantly reduces the lining damage and steel bar stress, especially within the 15° range of the cracks. Symmetrical preset cracks prevent the overlap of influence ranges, which can increase far-end steel bar stress. Increasing the number of preset cracks can alleviate lining damage at the joint far ends. However, more preset cracks raise construction costs and complexity while reducing lining quality. Under design requirements, six through symmetrical preset cracks are optimal at a lateral pressure coefficient of 0.39, and four through symmetrical preset cracks are optimal at a lateral pressure coefficient of 1.5.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, lined underground cavern, crack width, preset crack lining

中图分类号: TU 93
[1] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] 谈云志, 吴克宇, 明华军, 孙德安, . 团粒膨润土振动密实性与恒刚度约束膨胀行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2399-2408.
[3] 刘少华, 夏才初, 徐英俊, 徐晨, . 高内气压作用下岩石破裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3431-3440.
[4] 张格诚, 徐晨, 夏才初, . 考虑剪切变形的高压储气洞室复合式预设缝衬砌力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3533-3544.
[5] 鲁青云, 徐英俊, 夏才初, 刘少华, . 纤维增强柔性混凝土压气储能地下洞室力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3566-3575.
[6] 夏才初, 徐英俊, 王辰霖, 赵海鸥, 薛小代, . 基于非稳态渗流过程的压气储能 洞室空气渗漏率计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1765-1773.
[7] 蒋中明, 李鹏, 赵海斌, 冯树荣, 唐栋, . 压气储能浅埋地下储气库性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 235-241.
[8] 张 帆, 马 耕, 冯 丹, . 大尺寸真三轴煤岩水力压裂模拟试验 与裂缝扩展分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1890-1897.
[9] 蒋中明, 刘澧源, 赵海斌, 唐 栋, 胡 炜, 梅松华, 李 鹏, . 地下储气库热力耦合数值分析动态边界条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1149-1157.
[10] 夏才初 ,张平阳 ,周舒威 ,周 瑜 ,王 蕊,. 大规模压气储能洞室稳定性和洞周应变分析[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1391-1398.
[11] 肖 明,傅志浩 ,叶 超 . 管道衬砌内水外渗对边坡稳定影响的数值模拟[J]. , 2007, 28(2): 302-306.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!