岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3523-3533.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0089CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0089

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究

王兵1, 2,胡小波3,孔楠楠1, 2   

  1. 1. 安徽省(水利部淮河水利委员会)水利科学研究院,安徽 合肥 233040; 2. 安徽省水科学与智慧水利重点实验室,安徽 合肥 233040;3. 中交上海三航科学研究院,上海 200032
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-23 接受日期:2025-05-08 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 胡小波,男,1984年生,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事近海工程地基处理、海岸稳定性等研究。E-mail: 280810042@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王兵,男,1985年生,硕士,工程师,主要从事水利及水运工程质量检测、安全评估与科研工作。E-mail: 532105892@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2024YFC3212400);安徽省自然科学“水科学”联合基金项目(No. 208085US0)

Experimental study on vacuum combined with electro-osmosis for reinforcing ultrafine particle dredged soil

WANG Bing1, 2, HU Xiao-bo3, KONG Nan-nan1, 2   

  1. 1. Anhui Provincial (Huaihe River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources) Water Resources Science Research Institute, Hefei, Anhui 233040, China; 2. Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Science and Intelligent Water Conservancy, Hefei, Anhui 233040, China; 3. CCCC Third Harbor Scientific Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2025-01-23 Accepted:2025-05-08 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC3212400) and Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation Joint Fund Project for Water Science(208085US0).

摘要: 真空预压作为一种常见的处理高含水率饱和软土的地基加固方式,在大面积围海造陆工程中应用广泛。但是在许多真空预压加固饱和软土的工程案例中存在加固后地基承载力偏低,尤其是深层土体强度提高幅度有限的情况。大量研究表明,真空预压的加固效果受限于两个核心因素:真空度随深度的衰减效应以及细颗粒在排水板附近的富集对水流路径的阻塞作用。针对上述问题,依托乐清湾北港区吹填工程,提出在真空预压加固后期,采用电渗联合真空预压(electro-osmosis with vacuum preloading,简称EVP)进行短期加固以研究土体强度增长规律。试验通过采用大尺寸模型试验池的方式,先按正常的真空预压步骤抽气108 d,待沉降曲线稳定后,开启电渗联合真空预压加固。该阶段分为两个小的阶段,第1阶段持续11 d,然后对阴阳极进行互换开启第2阶段电渗联合真空预压试验,第2阶段持续6.5 d,共进行17.5 d电渗联合真空预压加固。经电渗联合真空预压加固后,20、60、100 cm 3个深度的土体含水率分别降低4.2%、4.84%、2.34%,十字板强度分别提高32%、75%、61.1%。试验结果表明:真空预压后期通过叠加电渗法,可在含水率降幅小于5%的情况下,实现十字板强度较大幅度的提升,特别是对于原先强度较低,单纯真空预压法加固困难的深层土体,强度提升了61%~75%,具有较好的加固效果。

关键词: 超细颗粒疏浚土, 高含水率, 真空预压, 电渗, 模型试验

Abstract: Vacuum preloading, as a widely adopted ground improvement method for saturated soft soils with high water content, is extensively applied in large-scale coastal reclamation projects. However, post-reinforcement bearing capacity remains insufficient in many engineering cases, particularly with limited strength improvement in deep soil layers. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the consolidation efficiency of vacuum preloading is constrained by two critical factors: depth-dependent attenuation of vacuum pressure and fine particle enrichment-induced clogging of drainage paths near prefabricated vertical drains. To address these challenges, this study integrates electro-osmosis with vacuum preloading (EVP) during the later stage of vacuum preloading in the dredger fill project of Yueqing Bay North Port Area. A large-scale model test pool was employed, where conventional vacuum preloading was conducted for 108 days until settlement stabilization, followed by a two-phase EVP intervention. The first phase lasted 11 days, after which electrode polarity was reversed for the second phase (6.5 days), totaling 17.5 days of EVP reinforcement. Post-EVP results revealed significant improvements: at depths of 20 cm, 60 cm, and 100 cm, soil water content decreased by 4.2%, 4.84%, and 2.34%, respectively, while vane shear strength increased by 32%, 75%, and 61.1%. The test results indicate that superimposing the electro-osmosis method during the later stage of vacuum preloading can achieve a significant improvement in vane shear strength (with a water content reduction of less than 5%). Particularly for deep soil layers with low initial strength that are difficult to reinforce solely by vacuum preloading, the strength increased by 61%−75%, demonstrating effective reinforcement performance.

Key words: ultra-fine-grained dredged soil, high water content, vacuum preloading, electro-osmosis, model test

中图分类号: TU 472.32
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[5] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[6] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[7] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[8] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[9] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[10] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[11] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[12] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[13] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[14] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[15] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 崔明娟, 黄斌彩. 富水砂层酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀防渗加固模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3715-3726.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!