岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 4009-4028.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0039CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0039

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

深厚覆盖层孔内原位测试技术现状与展望

张世殊1,李青春1,刘松玉2,崔德山3,李洪江2,黎伟3,陈盼4   

  1. 1. 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610072;2. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210096; 3. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;4. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-09 接受日期:2025-02-14 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-20
  • 作者简介:张世殊,男,1970年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事重大工程深部工程地质方面的研究工作。E-mail: 1992070@chidi.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.U22A20601)

A state-of-the-art review on the borehole in-situ testing techniques in deep overburden layer

ZHANG Shi-shu1, LI Qing-chun1, LIU Song-yu2, CUI De-shan3, LI Hong-jiang2, LI Wei3, CHEN Pan4   

  1. 1. PowerChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2025-01-09 Accepted:2025-02-14 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20601).

摘要: 我国西部水电工程、桥梁桩基和高层建筑多修建于高山峡谷中的深厚覆盖层上,为了准确获取深厚覆盖层物理力学参数,钻孔原位测试技术已受到广泛关注。为深入系统地梳理深厚覆盖层钻孔原位测试技术,对常用的静力触探、旁压、钻孔剪切、动力触探和标准贯入试验等原位测试仪器、测试技术与工艺、理论分析和数据解译等方面的研究现状与成果进行了综述分析。结果表明:静力触探试验的主要优点是测试连续快速和数据精度高等,主要缺点是难以贯入碎石类土和无法直接观测土层;针对深厚覆盖层中致密粉土、砂层、砾石、卵石和漂石层等,可采用钻探−触探联合法或多重套管触探技术,通过先引孔后测试的方法获得深厚覆盖层的锥尖阻力、侧摩阻力和渗透系数等参数。旁压试验的主要优点是在不同深度原位测量覆盖层的力学参数,主要缺点是受成孔质量影响大和软土测试精度不高;与预钻式和压入式旁压测试技术相比,自钻式旁压测试能够最大限度地减少对孔壁的扰动,有效防止深厚覆盖层中无黏性土的塌孔和黏性土的缩径现象,从而快速、精确地获得深厚覆盖层的静止侧压力、临塑压力、极限压力和旁压模量等参数。钻孔剪切试验的主要优点是在覆盖层天然应力状态下测量强度参数,主要缺点是剪切机制和排水条件不易控制;适用于深厚覆盖层中饱和细粒土,试验结果接近于固结不排水剪切强度参数。动力触探和标准贯入试验的主要优点是适用范围广和可进行砂土液化判别,主要缺点是锤击能量的传递不易确定;在超过一定深度的深厚覆盖层中,动力触探和标准贯入锤击数随深度的修正关系为非线性,宜通过监测锤击能量对锤击数进行修正。最后,指出缺少针对高应力水平、复杂结构性和超固结性的深厚覆盖层钻孔原位测试技术和精准的数据解译方法是当前存在的不足,研发多功能原位测试装备,联合多种原位测试技术,基于机器学习开展综合性多源数据融合与评价、测试参数关联性分析是解决这一问题的有效途径。

关键词: 深厚覆盖层, 静力触探试验, 自钻式旁压试验, 钻孔剪切试验, 动力触探试验, 标准贯入试验

Abstract: Hydropower projects, pile foundations of bridges and tall buildings in western China are primarily constructed on deep overburden layers within high mountainous valleys. To accurately determine the physical and mechanical parameters of these deep overburden layers, in-situ borehole testing technology has gained significant attention. This paper systematically reviews the current research status and achievements from the aspect of the test instrument, test technology and process, theoretical analysis and data interpretation of various in-situ testing techniques for deep overburden drilling, including static cone penetration test, pressuremeter test, borehole shear test, dynamic penetration test, and standard penetration test. The findings indicate that the main advantages of static cone penetration test are continuous rapid testing and high data accuracy, and its disadvantages include difficulty penetrating gravel soils and an inability to observe soil layers directly. The combined drilling-penetration exploration method and multi-casing penetration technology can effectively obtain cone-tip resistance, side friction resistance, and permeability for dense silt, sand, gravel, pebble and cobble layers in deep overburden. The pressuremeter test can measure in-situ mechanical parameters at different depths, but results are strongly affected by the pore-forming quality, with a lower testing precision in soft soil. Compared to pre-drilling and press-in pressuremeter methods, self-boring pressuremeter minimizes disturbance to the borehole walls, effectively preventing collapse in non-cohesive soils and shrinkage in cohesive soils within deep overburden layers, thereby rapidly and accurately obtaining static lateral pressure, plastic pressure, ultimate pressure, and lateral pressure modulus. The main advantage of the borehole shear test is that the strength parameter is measured under the natural stress state of the overburden, but the main disadvantage is that the shear mechanism and drainage conditions are not easy to control. Borehole shear tests are suitable for saturated fine-grained soils in deep overburden, with results closely approximating consolidated undrained shear strength parameters. The main advantages of dynamic penetration test and standard penetration test are wide application range and identification of sand liquefaction, but the main disadvantage is that the transmission of hammer energy is not easy to determine. In deep overburden at considerable depths, the relationship between dynamic penetration and standard penetration hammer numbers is nonlinear, necessitating appropriate correction of hammer numbers through monitoring hammer energy. Current challenges include a lack of in-situ drilling testing technologies and robust data-interpretation methods for deep overburden characterized by high-stress levels, complex structures, and overconsolidation. It is recommended to develop multifunctional in-situ testing equipment, integrate various in-situ testing technologies, and enhance the multi-source data correlation analysis of test parameters using machine learning. This approach is an effective solution to the problems.

Key words: deep overburden layer, static cone penetration test, self-boring pressuremeter test, borehole shear test, dynamic penetration test, standard penetration test

中图分类号: TU42
[1] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[2] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[3] 代仲海, 李裕成, 莫品强, 位鑫宇, 蔡国军. 基于静力触探数据的滨海黏土应力历史与强度特性解译研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3913-3923.
[4] 童森杰, 黄茂松, 时振昊, 王滨. 砂土全应变范围非线性特性对贯入大变形问题的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3707-3714.
[5] 王宽君, 刘彬, 莫品强, 李国耀, 朱启银, 沈侃敏, 胡静, . 考虑粉土温度效应与排水状态的CPTu计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1731-1742.
[6] 张会豪, 邱子源, 金伟, 张丹, 罗玉龙, . 反滤压重及埋深对深厚覆盖层允许坡降影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 769-776.
[7] 朱建民, 郑建国, 于永堂, 蔡晶, 夏辉, . 新型电控式钻孔剪切仪的研制及测试验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 687-697.
[8] 邹德高, 屈永倩, 孔宪京, 陈楷, 刘京茂, 龚瑾, . 超深覆盖层上高沥青心墙坝防渗墙受力状态的精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1826-1836.
[9] 贾端阳, 陈龙伟, 谢旺青, 李鑫洋, . 基于标准贯入试验的土壤液化判别公式锤击数 基准值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3031-3038.
[10] 王维铭, 陈龙伟, 郭婷婷, 汪云龙, 凌贤长, . 基于中国砂土液化数据库的标准贯入试验液化 判别方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 279-288.
[11] 张思宇, 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, . 基于静力触探试验的液化判别新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1596-1606.
[12] 朱旻, 陈湘生, 张国涛, 庞小朝, 苏栋, 刘继强, . 花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数反演及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1061-1072.
[13] 罗玉龙, 张兴杰, 张海彬, 盛金昌, 詹美礼, 王惠民, 何淑媛, . 深厚覆盖层地基潜蚀研究综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3094-3106.
[14] 王长虹, 汤道飞, 王昆, 吴昭欣. 静力触探试验的宏细观耦合分析方法与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1815-1827.
[15] 余挺, 邵磊. 含软弱土层的深厚河床覆盖层坝基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!