岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1131-1140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0766CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0766

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法

尚召伟1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,鄢俊彪1, 2,高志傲1, 2,王斐1, 2,黎澄生1, 3   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049;
    3.汕头大学 土木与环境工程系,广东 汕头 515000
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-19 接受日期:2024-08-13 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:尚召伟,男,2000年生,博士研究生,主要从事特殊土力学性质方面的研究。E-mail: shangzhaowei22@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 12272394)。

Small-strain shear modulus properties of unsaturated granitic residual soils and determination method of soil-water retention curves

SHANG Zhao-wei1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, YAN Jun-biao1, 2, GAO Zhi-ao1, 2, WANG Fei1, 2, LI Cheng-sheng1, 3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong 515000, China
  • Received:2024-06-19 Accepted:2024-08-13 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12272394).

摘要: 持水特征曲线是研究非饱和土强度、变形及渗流特性的基础,室内直接测量持水特征曲线复杂耗时。为快速准确获取花岗岩残积土的持水特征曲线,开展了不同含水率原状花岗岩残积土的共振柱试验,研究了非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性,并分别基于双应力状态变量最大剪切模量预测模型和单应力状态变量最大剪切模量预测模型反演了花岗岩残积土的持水特征曲线。研究表明:含水率对花岗岩残积土小应变剪切模量影响显著,剪切模量随着含水率的增大而减小,随围压的增大而增大;基于双应力状态变量最大剪切模量预测模型反演的持水特征曲线与压力板试验获得的结果较为一致,并通过试验数据检验了双应力状态变量最大剪切模量预测模型的准确性,讨论了模型的力学机制。利用共振柱试验不仅能够直接研究非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性,还可以通过反演法确定花岗岩残积土的持水特征曲线,为持水特征曲线的获取提供了一种新途径。

关键词: 原状花岗岩残积土, 共振柱试验, 小应变剪切模量, 非饱和土, 持水特征曲线, 反演分析

Abstract: The soil-water retention curve is the basis for the study of the strength, deformation and seepage characteristics of unsaturated soils, but the direct measurement of the curve in laboratory is complicated and time-consuming. In order to quickly and accurately obtain the soil-water retention curve of granite residual soil, the resonant column tests were carried out on granite residual soil with different water contents, the small-strain shear modulus characteristics of unsaturated granite residual soil were also studied. The soil-water retention curve of granite residual soil was inverted on the basis of the double-stress-variable maximum shear modulus prediction model and the single-stress-variable maximum shear modulus prediction model for unsaturated soils, respectively. The results show that the water content has a significant effect on the small-strain shear modulus of granite residual soil, and the shear modulus decreases with the increase of water content and increases with the increase of confining pressure. The inversion result of the soil-water retention curve based on the double-stress-variable maximum shear modulus prediction model is more consistent with the pressure plate experimental data. The accuracy of this prediction model is verified by the experimental data, and its mechanical mechanism is discussed. The resonant column test can not only directly study the small-strain shear modulus characteristics of unsaturated granite residual soil, but also project the soil-water retention curve of granite residual soil by the inversion method, which provides a new method for obtaining the soil-water retention curve.

Key words: undisturbed granite residual soils, resonant column test, small-strain shear modulus, unsaturated soil, soil-water retention curve, inverse analysis

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[4] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[5] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[6] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[7] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[8] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[9] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[10] 陈可, 王琛, 梁发云, 汪中卫, . 考虑水力滞后与变形耦合的非饱和土持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3694-3704.
[11] 周凤玺, 姚桃岐, 柳鸿博, . 非饱和土中Rayleigh波传播的能量特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 612-622.
[12] 邵帅, 邵生俊, 高梦洁, 刘小康, 王立新, 严广艺, . 水-力耦合非饱和黄土的弹塑性模型适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 436-442.
[13] 张常光, 关港辉, 李海祥, 范家燊, 石晶, . 水位变化下含裂缝非饱和土挡墙的地震主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1575-1584.
[14] 赵煜鑫, 李旭, 林森, 王逍萌, . 广吸力范围内一种改进的非饱和土抗剪强度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 990-1000.
[15] 牛庚, 朱晓凤, 李俊星, 吕梦缘, 安荔琪, 陈子晗, . 宽广吸力范围非饱和土剪切强度试验研究及其预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3349-3359.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!