岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1122-1130.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0735CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0735

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究

常仕奇1, 2,董晓强1, 2,刘晓凤1, 2, 3,李江山3,刘晓勇4,张豪儒1, 2,黄寅豪1, 2   

  1. 1.太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2.太原理工大学 土木工程防灾与控制山西省重点实验室,山西 太原 030024; 3.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;4.中铁城建集团第一工程有限公司,山西 太原 030024)
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-13 接受日期:2024-11-11 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 董晓强,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境岩土等方面的研究。E-mail: dongxiaoqiang@tyut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:常仕奇,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方向的研究。E-mail: changshiqi0068@link.tyut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52378360,No.51978438);山西省科技创新人才团队专项资助。

Model experiment and numerical simulation of the instability of a dry red mud storage yard dam caused by water level changes

CHANG Shi-qi1, 2, DONG Xiao-qiang1, 2, LIU Xiao-feng1, 2, 3, LI Jiang-shan3, LIU Xiao-yong4, ZHANG Hao-ru1, 2, HUANG Yin-hao1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. Shanxi Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Control, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. The 1st Engineering Corporation Limited, China Railway Urban Construction Group, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2024-06-13 Accepted:2024-11-11 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52378360, 51978438) and the Science and Technology Innovation Teams of Shanxi Province.

摘要: 针对干法堆存赤泥堆场在水位变动下可能发生的失稳危险问题,采用自行设计的水位控制系统模拟水位变动下的赤泥坝体溃坝情况,揭示了不同坡比(1:2和1:1)赤泥坝体在水位变动下的浸润线、孔隙水压力、土压力的分布规律以及裂缝演化等破坏特征。试验结果表明:浸润线的抬升先快后慢,存在滞后性;浸润线下方孔隙水压力最大位置的水平土压力最大;不同坡比下,产生主裂缝原因不同,坡比为1:2时,在重力与水力综合作用下,坡面裂缝因赤泥坝体内部形成延伸至坡面的贯穿通道而产生;坡比为1:1时,坝顶处裂缝因浸润线下方产生滑动的坡体对上部坡体产生牵引效应而出现。利用有限元软件ABAQUS 对不同坡比赤泥坝体的应力场与渗流场进行了分析,得到了坝体坡面应力场及位移的分布规律,数值模拟计算的结果与模型试验结果一致。

关键词: 赤泥坝体, 浸润线, 土压力, 孔隙水压力, 位移, 裂缝

Abstract: A self-designed water level control system was used to simulate the collapse of a red mud dam in a dry storage yard under varying water levels. The study unveiled the distribution patterns of seepage lines, pore water pressure, soil pressure, and crack evolution in red mud dams with varying slope ratios (1:2 and 1:1) under changing water levels. Experimental findings show that the rise of the infiltration line is initially rapid, then slows down, exhibiting a lag effect. The area with the highest pore water pressure beneath the infiltration line also experiences the highest horizontal soil pressure. Under different slope ratios, the reasons for the formation of main cracks are different. When the slope ratio is 1:2, under the combined action of gravity and hydraulic forces, slope cracks are generated due to the formation of a through channel extending from the interior of the red mud dam body to the slope surface. When the slope ratio is 1:1, cracks appear at the dam crest due to the traction effect of the sliding slope below the infiltration line on the upper slope. The stress and seepage fields of red mud dams with different slope ratios were analyzed using the finite element software ABAQUS, revealing the stress and displacement distribution patterns on the dam slope surface.

Key words: red mud dam, infiltration line, soil pressure, pore water pressure, displacement, cracks

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 张治国, 李乃义, 牛瑞, 王安源, 朱正国, . 考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道应力与位移复变函数解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 141-158.
[2] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[3] 郑晨, 白强强, 黄克起, 刘晓敏, 张强, 何晓佩, 宋立伟, . 黏土中竖井开挖诱发地层三维变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 335-342.
[4] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[5] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[6] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[7] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[8] 唐梅荣, 张广清, 张敏, . 多水平井立体化水力压裂缝网空间分布特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2449-2458.
[9] 卞海丁, 魏进, 王锦涛. 超大跨径管拱形钢波纹管涵洞的受力特性与土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2532-2546.
[10] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[11] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[12] 陈一纬, 董平川, . 饱和各向异性裂缝型岩石中波的频散和衰减[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1934-1942.
[13] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[14] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[15] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!