岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1205-1214.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1431CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1431

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析

唐先习1,张徐军1,李昊杰2   

  1. 1.兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050;2.东华大学 环境科学与工程学院 上海 201620
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-18 接受日期:2025-01-23 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 张徐军,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事地聚物固化黄土方面的课题研究。E-mail: zxjafxy@163.com
  • 作者简介:唐先习,男,1972年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: 695913483@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 11962016);中国铁路兰州局集团有限公司资助项目(No. LTKY2023036-1)。

Evaluation of mechanical properties and analysis of solidification principles of loess solidified with steel slag-coal gangue geopolymer

TANG Xian-xi1, ZHANG Xu-jun1, LI Hao-jie2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2024-11-18 Accepted:2025-01-23 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11962016) and the Fund of China Railway Lanzhou Group Co., Ltd. (LTKY2023036-1).

摘要: 近年来,西北地区极端降雨导致黄土路基边坡失稳滑坡现象多发,为解决此类工程事故,以钢渣(steel slag,SS)和煤矸石(coal gangue,CG)为原材料、水玻璃和脱硫石膏(desulfurization gypsum,DG)为活化剂制备了一种高强度的钢渣-煤矸石地聚物(steel slag-coal gangue geopolymer,SC-GP)来固化黄土。首先通过28 d无侧限抗压强度(unconfined compressive strength,UCS)试验确定了SC-GP的最优配合比。然后以SC-GP的最优配合比制备不同养护龄期和SC-GP掺量的固化土试样,通过UCS试验、直剪试验、崩解试验、X射线衍射(X-ray diffraction,XRD)试验、扫描电子显微镜(scanning electron microscope,SEM)试验和压汞法(mercury intrusion porosimetry,MIP)等试验从宏观和微观两个方面研究养护龄期和SC-GP掺量对固化土力学性能的影响规律。结果表明:SC-GP的最优配合比SS:CG:DG为40:54:6,水玻璃模数为1.2,水玻璃掺量为22%。SC-GP可以显著提升黄土的力学性能,并有效减缓固化土在水中的崩解率。当养护龄期达到28 d时,SC-GP掺量为20%的固化土UCS和黏聚力分别为359.09 kPa和112.76 kPa,分别是重塑黄土的3.45倍和2.3倍,且在300 min内固化土在水中几乎不发生崩解,崩解率不到1%。微观机制研究发现,SC-GP固化土中产生了许多C-S-H(水化硅酸钙)和C-A-S-H(水化硅酸铝钙)等胶凝物质;大孔径孔隙体积减小,而小孔径孔隙的体积相对增大。

关键词: 地聚物, 固化黄土, 力学性能, 微观机制, 胶凝物质, 孔隙体积

Abstract: In recent years, extreme rainfall in the northwest region has led to frequent instability and landslides of loess subgrade slopes. To address these engineering accidents, a high-strength steel slag-coal gangue geopolymer (SC-GP) was developed to solidify loess, using steel slag (SS) and coal gangue (CG) as raw materials and water glass and desulfurization gypsum (DG) as activators. First, the optimal mix ratio of SC-GP was determined through unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests after 28 days of curing. Then, solidified loess samples with different curing ages and SC-GP contents were prepared based on the optimal mix ratio of SC-GP. Macro- and micro-scale analyses were employed to investigate the influence of curing age and SC-GP content on the mechanical properties of the solidified loess, utilizing UCS, direct shear, disintegration, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) tests. The results indicate that the optimal mix ratio of SC-GP is SS: CG: DG at 40:54:6, with a water glass modulus of 1.2 and a water glass content of 22%. SC-GP significantly enhances the mechanical properties of loess and effectively reduces the disintegration rate of solidified loess in water. After 28 days of curing, the UCS and cohesion of solidified loess with 20% SC-GP content are 359.09 kPa and 112.76 kPa, respectively, which are 3.45 and 2.3 times higher than those of remolded loess. Moreover, the solidified loess hardly disintegrates within 300 minutes in water, with a disintegration rate of less than 1%. Microscopic studies reveal numerous C-S-H (calcium silicate hydrated) and C-A-S-H (calcium aluminate silicate hydrated) gelling materials. The volume of large pores in the solidified loess decreased, while the volume of small pores increased relatively.

Key words: geopolymer, solidified loess, mechanical properties, microscopic mechanism, gelling materials, pore volume

中图分类号: TU 444
[1] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[3] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[4] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[5] 薛钦培, 陈宏信, 冯世进, 刘晓轩, 谢伟, . 干湿循环作用下地聚物隔离墙材料渗透特性演化及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 811-820.
[6] 吕志涛, 朱小宝, 罗嗣成, 夏才初, 曾祥太, . 砂岩多周期累积冻融变形特性及其微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 389-401.
[7] 陶高梁, 周恒洁, 肖衡林, 周宏豫, . 新型边坡防护生态基材的力学-植生性能与抗冲刷效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3018-3032.
[8] 黎宇, 胡明鉴, 郑思维, 王志兵, . 电石渣-矿渣固化膨胀土强度及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 461-470.
[9] 刘鹏, 曹源兴, 程钰, 白云波, . 碳酸酐酶增强微生物矿化固土效果的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2554-2564.
[10] 姜启武, 黄明, 崔明娟, 靳贵晓, 彭仪欣, . 酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀技术加固TBM壁后吹填豆砾石最优配比试验及机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2037-2049.
[11] 徐文彬, 赵康奇, 张亚伦, 刘成保, 周磊, . 调控层胶结充填体三轴压缩力学性能及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3658-3667.
[12] 慕焕东, 何也, 白逸松, 邓亚虹, 郑龙浩, . 靖边Q3砂质黄土湿陷特征及其微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3024-3036.
[13] 王盛年, 苏俊, 郭双枫, 谷雷雷, 陈泽玮, 赵凯, . 地聚物稳定粗粒填料静动力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 350-364.
[14] 龙开荃, 方祥位, 申春妮, 张熙晨, 王明明, . 复合型早强土壤固化剂固化淤泥强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 309-318.
[15] 曾召田, 张瀚彬, 邵捷昇, 车东泽, 吕海波, 梁珍, . MX-80膨润土高温老化时间效应的细微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 145-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!