岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1811-1824.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0525CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0525

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究

梁庆国1,李景1,张崇辉1,刘彤彤2,孙志涛3   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 机械工业勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西 西安 710000; 3. 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,陕西 西安 710043
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-01 接受日期:2024-12-22 出版日期:2025-06-11 发布日期:2025-06-10
  • 作者简介:梁庆国,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: lqg_39@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51968041);甘肃省重点研发计划项目(No.25YFGA052);兰州交通大学青年科学基金(No.2024032);甘肃省优秀研究生“创新之星”(No.2025CXZX-658);中铁一院科技项目(No.2022KY32YB-02)。

Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation

LIANG Qing-guo1, LI Jing1, ZHANG Chong-hui1, LIU Tong-tong1, SUN Zhi-tao2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. China Jikan Research Institute of Engineering Investigations and Design, Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710000, China; 3. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China
  • Received:2024-05-01 Accepted:2024-12-22 Online:2025-06-11 Published:2025-06-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51968041), the Gansu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (25YFGA052), the Youth Science Foundation of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (2024032), the Innovation Star for Outstanding Graduate Students of Gansu Province (2025CXZX-658) and the China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Science and Technology Project (2022KY32YB-02).

摘要: 黄土地区的地层结构大多具有上部黄土、下部泥岩的二元结构特点。隧道穿越泥岩和黄土−泥岩复合地层时,地下水重分布并易于富集于仰拱底部,泥岩遇水膨胀则会产生仰拱底鼓,而不同的地层组合及其差异性对衬砌变形及受力特性影响显著。尝试采用在仰拱底部施加位移的方式模拟泥岩膨胀作用,依托甘肃天水某隧道,开展了纯泥岩地层与交界面位于拱腰处的黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道基底均匀膨胀作用下的底鼓模型试验。分析了两种工况下衬砌内力、变形及破坏特征的差异性,并将模型试验与数值模拟结果进行了对比。结果表明:(1)模型底部加载强制位移引起的膨胀变形可分为基底土体压密阶段和基底位移等效传递阶段两个阶段。(2)由于泥岩与黄土弹性模量比值约为2:1,相较之下,交界地层中上覆黄土刚度较小,对衬砌变形约束效果弱,仰拱隆起位移更大;交界面处拱腰更易向外扩张,扩张变形达9.2 mm,约为纯泥岩地层的3倍;交界面附近衬砌截面处易产生应力集中现象。(3)在两种地层中,仰拱及拱脚位置均表现出易于产生裂缝和损坏的特性。此外,在交界地层中,衬砌拱肩部位同样显示出较高的开裂风险,并且拱脚处的裂缝有向拱腰部位扩展的趋势。(4)相较于纯泥岩地层,交界地层中交界面附近黄土对仰拱底鼓作用具有荷载释放效应,交界面处黄土压缩吸收部分底鼓作用力,因此,上覆黄土地层可延后填充层发生受拉临界破坏的时间。其研究结果可为类似交界地层隧道的理论分析、设计与施工提供参考。

关键词: 仰拱底鼓, 交界地层, 模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: Strata structure of loess area mostly features a dualistic structure of loess and mudstone. When tunnels traverse mudstone and loess-mudstone composite strata, groundwater tends to redistribute and accumulate at the base of the inverted arch. The interaction between mudstone and water causes tunnel heave, and the lithological differences between the strata significantly affect the deformation and stress characteristics of the tunnel lining. Based on a tunnel project in Tianshui City, Gansu Province, model tests were conducted on tunnel in pure mudstone and loess-mudstone composite strata with the interface at the arch waist. Displacement was applied beneath the inverted arch to simulate the swelling effect of mudstone-water interaction. Differences in internal force, deformation, and failure characteristics of the lining under two loading conditions were investigated, and numerical simulations were conducted for comparison and verification. The differences in internal force, the deformation and failure characteristics of lining under two loading conditions were investigated, and the corresponding conditions numerical simulation was conducted for comparison and verification. The results show that: (1) Expansion deformation due to forced displacement at the model’s base can be divided into two stages: the base soil compaction stage and the equivalent transfer stage of base displacement. (2) With the elastic modulus ratio of mudstone to loess approximately 2:1, the loess stratum exhibits smaller overall stiffness, resulting in larger lining deformation and even larger heave displacement in inverted arch. The arch waist at the interface is more prone to outward expansion, with an expansion deformation of 9.2 mm, about three times that of the pure mudstone stratum. Stress concentration tends to occur at the lining section near the interface. (3) In both strata, the inverted arch and arch foot positions are prone to cracking and damage. Additionally, in the composite strata, the lining arch shoulder shows a high risk of cracking, with cracks at the arch foot tending to expand towards the arch waist. (4) Compared to pure mudstone stratum, the loess near the interface in loess-mudstone strata exerts a load release effect on the heave of inverted arch. The loess at the interface compresses and absorbs some of the heave force, thereby delaying the critical tensile failure time of the filling layer. The results can provide valuable references for theoretical analysis, design and construction of tunnels in similar composite strata.

Key words: inverted arch floor heave, interface strata, model experiment, numerical simulation

中图分类号: U25
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[5] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[6] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[7] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[8] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[9] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[10] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[11] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[14] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[15] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!