岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1825-1838.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1047CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1047

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究

祁凯1,万志辉1,戴国亮2,胡涛2,周峰1,张鹏1   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,江苏 南京 211816;2. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-26 接受日期:2024-10-09 出版日期:2025-06-11 发布日期:2025-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 万志辉,男,1990年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: wanzhihui@njtech.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:祁凯,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事钙质砂桩基工程及固废资源化利用方面的研究。E-mail: qikai@njtech.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52008100);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(No.2022M723534);江苏省高等学校自然科学研究项目(No.23KJA560005);江苏省碳达峰碳中和科技创新专项(No.BE2022605)。

Mechanical properties and microscopic mechanisms of calcareous sand solidified with different grouting materials

QI Kai1, WAN Zhi-hui1, DAI Guo-liang2, HU Tao2, ZHOU Feng1, ZHANG Peng1   

  1. 1. College of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211816, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2024-08-26 Accepted:2024-10-09 Online:2025-06-11 Published:2025-06-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52008100), the General Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M723534), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (23KJA560005) and the Jiangsu Province Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality Technology Innovation Special Project (BE2022605).

摘要: 针对钙质砂后压浆桩施工中使用的水泥注浆材料存在高碳排、高能耗和污染环境等问题,采用地聚物和高聚物两种绿色低碳注浆材料固化钙质砂,并将试验结果与水泥进行对比。通过无侧限抗压强度试验研究了不同注浆材料、养护时间和材料掺量对钙质砂加固体强度的影响,并结合X射线衍射、扫描电镜、能谱测试和核磁共振等手段,分析了不同注浆材料加固体的微观结构和矿物成分,揭示了其微观固化机制。结果表明:养护时间和掺量的增加有利于加固体强度的提高,其中高聚物加固体的强度最高,且早期强度增长速度较快,7 d的抗压强度约为28 d的90%;地聚物加固体抗压强度略低于水泥加固体,但其强度提升速度随着养护时间的增加逐渐超过水泥加固体,表现出长期稳定性的潜在优势。此外,地聚物和水泥加固体通过水化产物填充砂粒间隙、胶结砂土颗粒,显著提升抗压强度,而高聚物加固体强度的提升则在于其自身的性能。养护7 d的地聚物与高聚物加固体孔隙主要为小孔隙,占比超过95%,并随养护时间的推移逐渐增加,显著高于水泥加固体,对其强度的提升具有积极作用。研究结果可为绿色低碳注浆材料在钙质砂后压浆桩实际工程中的应用提供参考。

关键词: 钙质砂, 后压浆桩, 注浆材料, 加固体, 力学性能试验, 微观机制

Abstract: Due to the high carbon emissions, energy consumption, and environmental pollution associated with cement grout in the construction of post-grouted piles in calcareous sand, this study employed two types of green, low-carbon grouting materials (geopolymer and high polymer) to solidify calcareous sand. The experimental results were compared with those obtained from the traditional cement grouting materials. The study investigated the effects of different grouting materials, curing times, and material ratios on the strength of stabilized soil in calcareous sand using unconfined compressive strength tests. Additionally, techniques such as X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance were combined to analyze the microstructure and mineral composition of the stabilized soil with different grouting materials, revealing the micro solidification mechanism. The results show that increasing the curing time and material ratio enhances the strength of the stabilized soil. High polymer-stabilized soil exhibits the highest strength, with a faster early strength growth. The compressive strength at 7 d is approximately 90% of that at 28 d. The compressive strength of geopolymer-stabilized soil is slightly lower than that of cement-stabilized soil. However, its strength increase rate with curing time gradually surpasses that of cement-stabilized soil, indicating a potential advantage in long-term stability. Additionally, geopolymer and cement-stabilized soil significantly enhance compressive strength by filling gaps between sand grains and binding the sand particles through hydration products. However, the strength improvement of high polymer-stabilized soil is attributed to its inherent properties. The pores in 7 d cured geopolymer and high polymer-stabilized soils are primarily small, accounting for over 95% of total pores. This proportion gradually increases with curing time and is significantly higher than that in cement-stabilized soil. This positively affects strength enhancement. The research findings can serve as a reference for applying green, low-carbon grouting materials in engineering projects involving post-grouted piles in calcareous sand.

Key words: calcareous sand, post-grouted piles, grouting materials, stabilized soil, mechanical performance tests, microscopic mechanism

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[2] 陈嘉瑞, 樊宝云, 叶剑红, 张春顺, . 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性及破碎演化模型三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2095-2105.
[3] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[4] 薛钦培, 陈宏信, 冯世进, 刘晓轩, 谢伟, . 干湿循环作用下地聚物隔离墙材料渗透特性演化及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 811-820.
[5] 吕志涛, 朱小宝, 罗嗣成, 夏才初, 曾祥太, . 砂岩多周期累积冻融变形特性及其微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 389-401.
[6] 邵国建, 毛泽辉, 苏宇宸, 焦泓程, 吕亚茹. 钙质砂透射系数探究:波形耦合作用及梯度提升预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[7] 黎宇, 胡明鉴, 郑思维, 王志兵, . 电石渣-矿渣固化膨胀土强度及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 461-470.
[8] 陈军浩, 张艳娥, 王刚, 王恒, . 不同固结路径下钙质砂固结排水强度性状研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2290-2298.
[9] 姜启武, 黄明, 崔明娟, 靳贵晓, 彭仪欣, . 酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀技术加固TBM壁后吹填豆砾石最优配比试验及机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2037-2049.
[10] 张季如, 陈敬鑫, 王 磊, 彭伟珂. 三轴剪切过程中排水条件对钙质砂颗粒破碎、变形和强度特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 375-384.
[11] 杨阳, 王乐, 马建华, 童晨曦, 张春会, 王智超, 田英辉, . 考虑颗粒破碎影响的钙质砂中海底管道贯入机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 623-632.
[12] 慕焕东, 何也, 白逸松, 邓亚虹, 郑龙浩, . 靖边Q3砂质黄土湿陷特征及其微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3024-3036.
[13] 龙开荃, 方祥位, 申春妮, 张熙晨, 王明明, . 复合型早强土壤固化剂固化淤泥强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 309-318.
[14] 曾召田, 张瀚彬, 邵捷昇, 车东泽, 吕海波, 梁珍, . MX-80膨润土高温老化时间效应的细微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 145-153.
[15] 沈扬, 马英豪, 芮笑曦. 波浪荷载作用下饱和钙质砂孔压特性及累积损失能量试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2195-2204.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!