岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 1977-1987.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1140CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1140

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究

杨爱武,程姝晓,梁振振,华谦谦,杨少朋   

  1. 东华大学 环境科学与工程学院,上海 201620
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-14 接受日期:2025-05-06 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-08
  • 作者简介:杨爱武,男,1971年生,博士,博士后,教授,博士生导师,主要从事软黏土力学特性及土体微观结构方面的研究。E-mail: tulilab@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42177119,No.42377141)

Combined effects of large-strain consolidation and creep in high-moisture dredger fill

YANG Ai-wu, CHENG Shu-xiao, LIANG Zhen-zhen, HUA Qian-qian, YANG Shao-peng   

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2024-09-14 Accepted:2025-05-06 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177119, 42377141).

摘要: 高黏粒含量吹填场地在运营中因大变形固结与流变叠加效应导致地基变形显著,严重威胁工程安全。以高黏粒含量吹填土为研究对象,通过室内试验分析了土体大变形固结与流变特性,推导了大变形固结有限元方程,建立基于分数阶导数的流变本构模型,构建考虑大变形固结与流变叠加效应的有限元模型;利用模型箱试验对数值模拟进行验证,分析了荷载作用下该叠加效应对表面沉降的影响。结果表明:大变形固结过程吹填土应变-时间曲线呈现显著的衰减特征,且后期逐渐显现流变效应;吹填土流变变形具有明显的非线性特征,其中非线性黏塑性变形阶段占流变变形主要地位,该阶段变形量约占流变总变形量的59%;随着固结时间的增加,吹填土排水量和表面沉降呈现先快速增加而后稳定的趋势。该数值模拟能很好地反映吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应,模拟值与模型箱实测值较为一致。

关键词: 高含水率吹填土, 大变形固结, 流变, 本构模型, 叠加效应

Abstract: High-moisture dredger fill sites with significant clay content are prone to substantial deformation during operation due to the combined effects of large strain consolidation and creep, posing critical risks to engineering safety. This study focuses on the mechanical behavior of high-moisture dredger fill under these conditions. Through comprehensive laboratory testing, the large strain consolidation and creep characteristics of the soil were analyzed. A finite element equation for large strain consolidation was developed, and a creep constitutive model based on fractional derivatives was established. A finite element model was constructed to capture the overlying effects of both large strain consolidation and creep deformation. Validation through model box experiments demonstrated the accuracy of the numerical simulations, which were employed to analyze the impact of these combined effects on surface settlement under applied loads. The results indicate that the strain-time curve during large strain consolidation shows significant attenuation, with creep deformation becoming increasingly pronounced in the later stages. The creep behavior of the dredger fill soil is distinctly nonlinear, with the nonlinear viscoplastic deformation phase accounting for approximately 59% of the total creep deformation. As consolidation time progresses, drainage volume and surface settlement initially increase rapidly before reaching a stable phase. The numerical model successfully captures the coupled effects of large strain consolidation and creep, with simulation results closely matching the experimental observations. This research provides valuable technical insight for the rational design and safe management of high-moisture dredger fill projects.

Key words: high moisture dredger fill, large strain consolidation, creep, constitutive model, overlying effect

中图分类号: TU 433
[1] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[2] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[3] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[4] 许江, 李艾峰, 彭守建, 陈奕安, 汤杨, 侯亚彬, 罗利威, . 基于广义应力松弛特性的岩石时效性数值模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2943-2954.
[5] 崔纪飞, 吴祯祯, 李林, 饶平平, . 考虑土体流变的新旧混合群桩变刚度调平研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[6] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[7] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[8] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[9] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[10] KOCHARYAN Gevorg, OSTAPCHUK Alexey, SHATUNOV Ivan, 戚承志. 含黏土断层滑动行为稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3513-3522.
[11] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[12] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[13] 王番, 郅彬, 刘恩龙, 王小婵, 邓博团, 李金华, 张辉, . 考虑局部胶结破损热力学行为的结构性黄土二元介质本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 97-109.
[14] 薛阳, 苗发盛, 吴益平, 温韬, 王艳昆, . 土体本构模型参数的不确定性评估研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2797-2807.
[15] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!