岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 2049-2061.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1229CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1229

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究

储超群1,包兴佳1,毛明发2, 3,吴顺川1, 3,崔贺佳1   

  1. 1.北京科技大学 资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083;2.云南驰宏锌锗股份有限公司会泽矿业公司,云南 曲靖 654211; 3.昆明理工大学 国土资源工程学院,云南 昆明 650093
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-08 接受日期:2025-01-20 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 吴顺川,男,1969年生,博士,教授,主要从事采矿工程与岩土工程的教学与科研工作。E-mail: wushunchuan@163.com
  • 作者简介:储超群,男,1994年生,博士,讲师,主要从事采矿工程与岩石力学的科研工作。E-mail: chuchaoqun@ustb.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51934003);云南省重大科技专项(No.202102AF080001);云南省创新团队资助项目(No.202105AE160023)。

Experimental study of acoustic emission characteristics and failure forms of deep-buried limestone under triaxial compression

CHU Chao-qun1, BAO Xing-jia1, MAO Ming-fa2, 3, WU Shun-chuan1 ,3, CUI He-jia1   

  1. 1. School of Resource and Safety Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Huize Mining Company, Yunnan Chihong Zinc and Germanium Co., Ltd, Qujing, Yunnan 654211, China; 3. Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, China
  • Received:2024-10-08 Accepted:2025-01-20 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51934003), the Major Science and Technology Special Project of Yunnan Province (202102AF080001) and the Program of Yunnan Innovation Team(202105AE160023)

摘要: 为探究深地灰岩在不同围压下的破坏过程,选取了来自于云南会泽某矿1 104水平的灰岩放在10、20、30、40、50、60 MPa共6种围压条件进行三轴压缩试验,并全程同步采用声发射技术监测。针对不同围压下灰岩的应力-应变、振铃计数、累计振铃计数、能量计数、累计能量计数及破坏形式进行分析。研究结果表明:在不同围压条件的作用下,灰岩受轴向施压会依次历经弹性变形阶段、屈服阶段、塑性发展阶段及脆性破坏阶段4个过程;不同围压下的灰岩加载时内部裂隙发展引发的声发射能量变化和振铃计数曲线起伏有相似的变化规律,同时两者的峰值强度随着围压的增大而逐渐降低;灰岩的破坏形式以剪切破坏为主,围压为10 MPa破坏时呈“Y”形裂纹,其他围压下破坏时呈“I ”形裂纹;高围压下灰岩破碎程度降低,次生裂纹的发展缓慢且更不易被破坏,抗压强度更大;灰岩破碎完整度随围压的增大而增加。

关键词: 三轴压缩, 灰岩, 声发射, 力学特征, 破坏模式

Abstract: In order to explore the failure process of deep-buried limestone under different confining pressures, limestone samples were taken from the 1104 level of a mine in Huize, Yunnan Province, and subjected to triaxial compression tests under six confining pressure conditions (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 MPa), with the entire process being monitored synchronously using acoustic emission technology. Analyses were conducted on the stress-strain relationships, ringing counts, cumulative ringing counts, energy counts, cumulative energy counts, and failure modes of the limestone under different confining pressures. The results show that under different confining pressure conditions, the limestone experiences four sequential stages when subjected to axial pressure: elastic deformation, yielding, plastic development, and brittle failure. The AE energy changes and the fluctuations in the ringing count curve resulting from the development of internal fractures in the limestone under different confining pressures exhibit similar patterns, and the peak values of both gradually decrease as the confining pressure increases. The failure mode of the limestone is mainly shear failure. It exhibits 'Y'-shaped cracks when failing at a confining pressure of 10 MPa and 'I'-shaped cracks when failing at other confining pressures. Under high confining pressures, the fragmentation degree of the limestone decreases, the development of secondary cracks slows down, the limestone becomes more resistant to damage, and its compressive strength increases. The integrity of the crushed limestone increases as the confining pressure rises.

Key words: triaxial compression, limestone, acoustic emission, mechanical characteristic, failure mode

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[2] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[3] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[4] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[5] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[6] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[7] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[8] 马春德, 康子豪, 阳文源, 谭观霜, 赵俊康, . 不同加载速率下花岗岩多期应力记忆方向独立性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1709-1718.
[9] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[10] 韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, 朱君星, 王林飞, 潘堃, . 结构面影响深埋隧道硬质围岩岩爆特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[11] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[12] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[13] 王晓敏, 屈钧利, 师亚平. 基于自回归模型方差陡增效应的微震P波到时拾取[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1335-1342.
[14] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[15] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!