岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 2505-2515.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1150CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1150

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究

高帅,任富强,常远   

  1. 辽宁科技大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 鞍山 114051
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-18 接受日期:2025-01-05 出版日期:2025-08-11 发布日期:2025-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 任富强,男,1992 年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩石力学相关的研究工作。E-mail: renfuqiang@ustl.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:高帅,男,2002 年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: 2059217825@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52409128);辽宁省高校基本科研业务费(No. LJ212410146068)。

Investigation of slurry flow characteristics during the prefabricated single fracture sandstone grouting

GAO Shuai, REN Fu-qiang, CHANG Yuan   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, Liaoning 114051, China
  • Received:2024-09-18 Accepted:2025-01-05 Online:2025-08-11 Published:2025-08-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52409128) and the Basic Scientific Research Business Expenses of Universities in Liaoning Province (LJ212410146068).

摘要: 为探究裂隙岩石渗透注浆过程的特性,设计了一套岩石裂隙注浆试验系统,该系统包含浆液供给系统、数据监测系统和注浆模拟系统。通过对单裂隙砂岩在不同注浆压力(0.3、0.4、0.5 MPa)下进行注浆试验,分析了管道流动压力、浆液流量和浆液压力的变化规律,并结合数值模拟探讨了浆液参数对流动特性的影响。试验结果显示,管道流动压力、浆液流量和浆液压力呈现上升―稳定―下降的三阶段变化特征。在稳定阶段,3个变量与注浆压力正相关,但对注浆压力变化的敏感性不同。随着注浆压力升高,浆液压力增加,而浆液流量对注浆压力变化的响应逐渐减小(注浆压力从0.3 MPa增至0.5 MPa时,浆液流量分别增加了15.3%和8.1%)。当注浆压力达到0.3 MPa及以上时,管道内的流动压力保持不变。数值模拟结果表明,浆液流动特性与其在裂隙中的扩散形式有关。扩散为半圆形时,浆液流速降低,流量上升;扩散形式由半圆变为凸字形时,浆液流速增加;由凸字形变为均匀扩散时,各参数趋于稳定。浆液流量、流速与浆液的塑性黏度成反比,且影响效果随塑性黏度的增加而增强,而浆液屈服应力对浆液流量、速度影响较小。

关键词: 贯通裂隙, 注浆试验, 流动特征, 扩散规律, 浆液参数

Abstract: To explore the characteristics of the seepage grouting process of fractured rock, this study designed a set of rock fracture grouting experimental systems, including slurry supply, data monitoring, and grouting simulation sub-systems. Through the grouting experiment of single fracture sandstone under different grouting pressures (0.3, 0.4, 0.5 MPa), the variation of pipeline flow pressure, slurry flow rate, and slurry pressure were analyzed, and the influence of slurry parameters on flow characteristics was discussed by numerical simulation. The experimental results show that the pipeline flow pressure, slurry flow rate, and slurry pressure show a three-stage characteristic of rising-stabilizing-falling. In the stable stage, the three variables positively correlate with the grouting pressure, but the sensitivity to the change in grouting pressure is different. With the increase of grouting pressure, the slurry pressure increases, while the response of slurry flow to the change of grouting pressure gradually decreases (when the grouting pressure increases from 0.3 MPa to 0.5 MPa, the slurry flow increases by 15.3% and 8.1% respectively). When the grouting pressure reaches 0.3 MPa, the flow pressure in the pipeline remains unchanged. The numerical simulation results show that the slurry flow is related to its diffusion form in the fracture. When the diffusion is semi-circular, the slurry velocity decreases, and the flow rate increases. The slurry velocity increases when the diffusion form changes from semicircle to convex. When the diffusion form changes from convex to uniform diffusion, the parameters tend to be stable. The slurry flow rate and flow velocity are inversely proportional to the plastic viscosity of the slurry. The increase of the plastic viscosity enhances the effect, while the slurry yield stress has little effect on the flow rate and flow velocity.

Key words: penetrative fracture, grouting tests, slurry diffusion, diffusion law, slurry parameters

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 刘新荣, 张吉禄, 周小涵, 刘煜宇, 刘瀚之, . 考虑轴向应力作用的贯通裂隙岩体变形及渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3596-3612.
[2] 付宏渊, 蒋煌斌, 邱祥, 姬云鹏, . 低应力与覆水环境下单裂隙粉砂质泥岩渗流特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3840-3850.
[3] 艾希, 冷伍明, 徐方, 张期树, 翟斌, . 新型预应力路基水平附加应力计算的图表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 253-266.
[4] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[5] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[6] 王辰霖, 张小东, 杜志刚, . 循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2140-2153.
[7] 冷伍明, 张期树, 徐方, 聂如松, 杨奇, 艾希, . 新型预应力路基坡面法向附加应力扩散规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3987-4000.
[8] 程 桦, 彭世龙, 荣传新, 孙泽辉, . 千米深井L型钻孔预注浆加固硐室围岩 数值模拟及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 274-284.
[9] 李术才,冯 啸,刘人太,张乐文,韩伟伟,郑 卓. 考虑渗滤效应的砂土介质注浆扩散规律研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 925-933.
[10] 张伟杰 ,李术才 ,魏久传 ,张庆松 ,张 霄 ,李志鹏 ,谢道雷,. 三维注浆模型试验系统研制及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 902-911.
[11] 张庆松 ,张连震 ,刘人太 ,韩伟伟 ,朱明听 ,李相辉 ,郑东柱 ,徐咸辉,. 水泥-水玻璃浆液裂隙注浆扩散的室内试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2159-2168.
[12] 刘 健,张载松,韩 烨,吴 星. 考虑黏度时变性的水泥浆液盾构壁后注浆扩散规律及管片压力模型的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 361-368.
[13] 袁小清 ,刘红岩 ,刘京平,. 基于宏细观损伤耦合的非贯通裂隙岩体本构模型[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2804-2814.
[14] 俞文生 ,李 鹏 ,张 霄 ,王 倩,. 可变倾角单裂隙动水注浆模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2137-2143.
[15] 孙 锋,张顶立,姚海波. 土坝坝体底部劈裂灌浆加固效果研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1187-1192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!