岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 2825-2836.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1607CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1607

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法

黄德昕1, 2,温韬1, 2, 3,陈宁生1, 3   

  1. 1. 长江大学 地球科学学院,湖北 武汉 430100;2. 长江大学 南方复杂页岩油气地质与开发湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430100; 3. 长江大学 山地多灾害防控与工程安全国际科技合作基地,湖北 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-30 接受日期:2025-04-17 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-04
  • 作者简介:黄德昕,女,2001年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学等方面的研究工作。E-mail: 2023710539@yangtzeu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42477174);西藏自治区科技项目(No.XZ202402ZD0001,No.XZ202502YD0003,No.XZ202301YD0034C);青海省基础研究计划项目(No.2024-ZJ-904)。

Methods for determining residual strength of rock considering energy evolution

HUANG De-xin1, 2, WEN Tao1, 2, 3, CHEN Ning-sheng1, 3   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Complex Shale Oil and Gas Geology and Development in Southern China, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China; 3. International Cooperation Center for Mountain Multi-Disasters Prevention and Engineering Safety, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China
  • Received:2024-12-30 Accepted:2025-04-17 Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42477174), the Science and Technology Program of Xizang Automous Region (XZ202402ZD0001, XZ202502YD0003, XZ202301YD0034C) and the Qinghai Province Basic Research Program Project (2024-ZJ-904).

摘要: 岩石残余强度是隧道开挖、矿山开采、边坡支护等工程的重要参数之一,准确计算岩石残余强度对工程开挖和设计具有重要意义。目前,主要根据强度准则计算岩石残余强度,计算结果误差较大、部分参数获取较难。因此,提出根据岩石应力−应变曲线特征,采用能量降比参数来定量表征强度跌落,考虑岩石破坏全过程的能量演化规律提出残余强度确定方法。为了验证该方法的合理性,开展了某地区砂岩的三轴压缩试验,表明能量降比和围压二者之间存在明显负相关性,相关性高达0.943。收集了20种不同岩石类型的试验数据进行计算,并将结果与两种已有方法进行对比,表明提出的方法能够较准确计算岩石残余强度。以能量降比拟合线斜率变化特征为依据可将能量降比曲线分为两类:向下凹型曲线和向上凸型曲线,并揭示了2类曲线与岩石的脆延转换特性及岩石破坏模式之间的关联性。研究成果对岩体工程稳定性评价具有重要的参考价值。

关键词: 残余强度, 能量参数, 能量降比, 三轴试验, 岩石破坏

Abstract: Rock residual strength is a critical parameter for engineering projects such as tunnel excavation, mining operations, and slope stabilization. The calculation of residual strength using strength criteria often yields inaccurate results, and the required parameters are difficult to obtain. In this study, we introduce the energy reduction ratio parameter to quantify the strength reduction and propose a novel method for determining residual strength. To validate the method, triaxial compression tests were conducted on sandstone samples in a region. The results indicate a significant negative correlation (0.943) between the energy reduction ratio and confining pressure. Subsequently, experimental data from 20 different rock types were collected and analyzed. Compared with two existing methods, the proposed method provides more accurate calculations of rock residual strength. Based on the slope characteristics of the energy reduction ratio fitting curve, two distinct types of curves can be identified: concave downward and convex upward curves. Finally, the correlation between these curve types and rock brittleness-ductility transitions, as well as their relationship with rock failure modes, is established. These findings offer valuable references for evaluating the stability of rock mass engineering.

Key words: residual strength, energy parameter, energy reduction ratio, triaxial test, rock failure

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[3] 陈嘉瑞, 樊宝云, 叶剑红, 张春顺, . 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性及破碎演化模型三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2095-2105.
[4] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[5] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
[6] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[7] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[8] 王泽驰, 邵帅, 邵生俊, 吴昊, 张彬, 张少英. 真三轴力-水路径下原状黄土增湿变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3451-3461.
[9] 蒋剑青, 罗敏华, 胡诗红, 柳志灏, . 断续节理产状对砂岩破坏特征影响的真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3077-3092.
[10] 屈俊童, 王文彬, 屈林河, . 基于二元介质简化模型的滇池湖相沉积典型冻结泥炭质土力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 233-243.
[11] 李宗恩, 刘星炎, 郑青松, 胡琪, 潘乾通, . 连通率对不同倾角结构面岩样力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 244-256.
[12] 杨家强, 朱玉龙, 奚邦禄, 张振华, . 不同含水率下脏污道砟累积塑性变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 715-722.
[13] 丁旭升, 张凌凯, 樊培培, . 干湿冻融循环条件下重塑性黄土的强度劣化规律及非线性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 324-336.
[14] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[15] 肖思奇, 黄科锋, 周红波, . 基于动三轴试验的软黏土软化系数的分析与预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 133-146.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!