岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 2885-2893.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1273CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1273

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力

方薇1, 2,吴润丰1,周春梅3   

  1. 1. 长沙理工大学 交通学院,湖南 长沙 410114;2. 巴黎理工学院 纳维实验室,法国 巴黎; 3. 湖南财政经济学院 工程管理学院,湖南 长沙 410205
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-16 接受日期:2025-03-10 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-04
  • 通讯作者: 吴润丰,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事非饱和土土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: wurunfeng01@163.com
  • 作者简介:方薇,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: fangwei5642366@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52178413);湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(No.2022JJ30593);科技部重点研发计划项目(No.2021YFB2600900);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.52338009)。

Rankine passive earth pressure of unsaturated soil using envelope shell model

FANG Wei1, 2, WU Run-feng1, ZHOU Chun-mei3   

  1. 1. School of Transportation, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 2. Navier Laboratory, Paris Institute of Technology, Paris, France; 3. College of Construction Management, Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha, Hunan 410205, China
  • Received:2024-10-16 Accepted:2025-03-10 Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178413), the General Program of Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2022JJ30593), the Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2021YFB2600900) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52338009).

摘要: 为了考虑非饱和土抗剪强度在净法向应力和基质吸力2个维度的非线性变化对被动土压力的影响,基于非线性抗剪强度包络壳和经典朗肯土压力理论,提出了土体处于非饱和状态时的挡土墙墙背被动土压力计算方法。首先,根据广义Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则,采用变切线法获取包络壳上任意一点对应的等效黏聚力与等效内摩擦角的相互关系;然后,结合莫尔圆应力分析,利用迭代法解得被动极限平衡条件下的等效黏聚力和等效内摩擦角;最后,推导出与经典土力学具有相同形式的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力表达式。在此基础上,通过算例对本法的可靠性进行了对比验证。参数分析表明:随着基质吸力和上覆荷载的增加,等效黏聚力和被动土压力增大,而等效内摩擦角呈减小趋势。就算例而言,相较于包络面模型,低基质吸力水平下由包络壳得到的被动土压力较小,而高基质吸力水平下其被动土压力则较大。

关键词: 非饱和土, 朗肯被动土压力, 抗剪强度包络壳, 广义Mohr-Coulomb准则, 持水曲线

Abstract: To consider the effect of nonlinear changes of the shear strength of unsaturated soil in the two dimensions of net normal stress and matric suction on the passive earth pressure, a calculation method for the passive earth pressure on the back of retaining walls for unsaturated backfill is proposed based on the nonlinear shear strength envelope shell and the classical Rankine earth pressure theory. First, employing the generalized Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, we applied the variable tangent technique to determine equivalent cohesion, equivalent friction angle, and their correlations at arbitrary points on the envelope. Subsequently, through iterative analysis combining Mohr’s circle stress states, we determined the equivalent cohesion and friction angle under passive limit equilibrium conditions. Finally, we derived Rankine passive earth pressure expressions for unsaturated soils that maintain formal consistency with classical soil mechanics formulations. The method’s reliability was validated through comparative case studies with established models. Parametric analysis revealed that increasing matric suction and overburden pressure enhances equivalent cohesion and passive pressure, while reducing equivalent friction angle. In the case study, the envelope shell model yielded lower passive earth pressures than the plane model at low matric suction levels, but higher pressures at elevated suction levels.

Key words: unsaturated soil, Rankine passive earth pressure, shear strength envelope shell, generalized Mohr-Coulomb criterion, soil-water retention curve (SWRC)

中图分类号: TU432
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[3] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[4] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[5] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[6] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[7] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[8] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[9] 陈可, 王琛, 梁发云, 汪中卫, . 考虑水力滞后与变形耦合的非饱和土持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3694-3704.
[10] 周凤玺, 姚桃岐, 柳鸿博, . 非饱和土中Rayleigh波传播的能量特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 612-622.
[11] 邵帅, 邵生俊, 高梦洁, 刘小康, 王立新, 严广艺, . 水-力耦合非饱和黄土的弹塑性模型适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 436-442.
[12] 张常光, 关港辉, 李海祥, 范家燊, 石晶, . 水位变化下含裂缝非饱和土挡墙的地震主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1575-1584.
[13] 赵煜鑫, 李旭, 林森, 王逍萌, . 广吸力范围内一种改进的非饱和土抗剪强度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 990-1000.
[14] 牛庚, 朱晓凤, 李俊星, 吕梦缘, 安荔琪, 陈子晗, . 宽广吸力范围非饱和土剪切强度试验研究及其预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3349-3359.
[15] 赵煜鑫, 李 旭, 赵红芬, 刘 艳. 宽饱和度范围非饱和土抗剪强度指标的演化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2809-2820.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!