岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 2894-2906.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1368CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1368

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应

李新明1,何永飞1,谈云志2,任克彬3,张先伟4,尹松1   

  1. 1. 中原工学院 建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450007;2. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002; 3. 河南省文物建筑保护研究院,河南 郑州 450007;4. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-05 接受日期:2025-02-05 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-05
  • 作者简介:李新明,男,1987年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土土力学及土遗址保护方面的研究工作。E-mail: xinmingli01@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省优秀青年基金(No.242300421153);中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室开放基金(No.SKLGME022027)。

Freeze-thaw effect of macro- and micro-properties of lime-metakaolin stabilized archaeological soil under varying water contents

LI Xin-ming1, HE Yong-fei1, TAN Yun-zhi2, REN Ke-bin3, ZHANG Xian-wei4, YIN Song1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. Henan Provincial Architectural Heritage Protection and Research Institute, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2024-11-05 Accepted:2025-02-05 Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Henan Outstanding Youth Science Foundation (242300421153) and the Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SKLGME022027).

摘要: 土遗址根部的掏蚀程度往往随高度不同而变化,这与遗址土含水率随高度不同而变化有关。研究了冻融循环对不同含水率(0~3%、0~6%、0~9%、0~12%)范围下石灰−偏高岭土(lime-metakaolin,简称L-MK)改良遗址土表观形貌、质量损失、无侧限抗压强度、色差、物相成分与微观结构的影响,所有试验均以天然水硬性石灰(natural hydraulic lime,简称NHL)改良遗址土作为对照。结果表明,L-MK及NHL改良土试样表面劣化程度和质量损失均与冻融循环次数和含水率梯度呈正比。含水率梯度对L-MK改良土试样抗压强度的影响存在阈值:含水率变化范围为0~3%的试样抗压强度与冻融循环次数成正比,但随含水率梯度增加,试样抗压强度与冻融循环次数成反比,且在首次冻融循环时强度下降最为显著。在土遗址修复工程中,尤其应注意冻融循环初期、高含水率位置土体的加固与监测;微观试验结果表明:随着含水率梯度增加,改良土微观结构在冻融侵蚀后具有明显的孔隙发育特征,水化硅酸钙(calcium silicate hydrate,简称CSH)及水化铝酸钙(calcium aluminate hydrate,简称CAH)等水化产物含量明显减少。NHL改良土颜色差异在可识别阶段,L-MK改良土颜色差异在轻微或可察觉阶段,L-MK改良土满足土遗址修复要求。

关键词: 土遗址, 石灰?偏高岭土, 含水率, 冻融循环

Abstract: The erosion degree at the root of the earthen site often exhibits variations with the height, correlating with the soil’s moisture content. This study investigates the effects of freeze-thaw cycles on the apparent morphology, mass loss, unconfined compressive strength, color difference, phase composition, and microstructure of lime-metakaolin (L-MK) improved soil under varying moisture (0−3%, 0−6%, 0−9%, 0−12%). All experiments used natural hydraulic lime (NHL) improved soil as the control. Results indicate that the surface deterioration and mass loss of L-MK and NHL improved soil samples correlate positively with the number of freeze-thaw cycles and moisture content. A threshold exists in the influence of moisture content on the compressive strength of L-MK improved soil samples. At a 0−3% moisture content range, compressive strength increases with freeze-thaw cycles. Beyond this, strength decreases inversely with freeze-thaw cycles, with the most significant drop occurring in the first cycle. In earthen site restoration projects, the soil at high moisture positions should be closely monitored and reinforced during the initial freeze-thaw stage. Microscopic analysis reveals that increasing moisture content leads to pore development in the improved soil’s microstructure after freeze-thaw erosion, accompanied by a noticeable reduction in hydration products like calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) and calcium aluminate hydrate (CAH). NHL improved soil exhibits recognizable color differences, while L-MK improved soil shows slight or perceptible changes. L-MK improved soil satisfies the restoration requirements for earthen heritage sites.

Key words: earthen site, lime-metakaolin, water content gradient, freezing-thawing

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[2] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[3] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[4] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[5] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[6] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[7] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[8] 刘文林, 鄂天龙, 冯杨州, 牛松荧, 张子堂, 孙熠, 陈宏信, . 纳米改性地聚合物隔离墙材料基本工程特性及冻融循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2039-2048.
[9] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[10] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[11] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[12] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[13] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[14] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[15] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!