岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 141-158.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0203CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0203

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道应力与位移复变函数解

张治国1, 2, 3,李乃义1,牛瑞2, 3,王安源2, 3,朱正国4   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院,上海 200093;2. 中铁隧道局集团有限公司,广东 广州 511458;3. 中铁隧道集团二处有限公司,河北 廊坊 065000; 4. 石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-26 接受日期:2025-06-16 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-08-27
  • 作者简介:张治国,男,1978年生,博士,博士后,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下工程等方面的研究工作。E-mail: zgzhang@usst.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.52478402);中铁隧道局二处研究课题。

Stress and displacement solution using complex variable functions for double-arch tunnel considering construction effects of middle guideway

ZHANG Zhi-guo1, 2, 3, LI Nai-yi1, NIU Rui2, 3, WANG An-yuan2, 3, ZHU Zheng-guo4   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. China Railway Tunnel Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511458, China; 3. The 2nd Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Railway Tunnel Group, Langfang, Hebei 065000, China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2025-02-26 Accepted:2025-06-16 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-27
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the by National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478402) and the Fund of the 2nd Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Railway Tunnel Group.

摘要: 目前针对双连拱隧道施工影响的理论分析中较少考虑中导洞带来的施工效应,而含中导洞的双连拱隧道是较为常见的一种设计类型。实际施工中,中导洞先行施工,存在中导洞与左洞1、右洞2共用衬砌边界以及中隔墙的回筑工序。基于复变函数理论解和Schwarz交替法,提出了考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道衬砌与围岩应力和变形的计算方法。针对中导洞与左右相邻洞室具有共用衬砌边界的特点,利用柯西积分法进行求解时,将各洞衬砌与围岩接触的边界积分条件转化为仅存在单洞时的完整边界积分与共用边界积分之差,与采用Schwarz 交替法求解三洞相互作用过程中某一洞室开挖对邻洞产生“附加面力”的过程一致。基于苏州七子山连拱隧道工程,将解析结果与监测数据、数值模拟结果进行对比,证明了复变函数方法的可行性。此外,针对围岩泊松比、围岩弹性模量、中导洞高宽比、连拱整体对称性为关键因素,对围岩位移和衬砌临空面位移开展敏感性分析。结果表明:围岩弹性模量变化对洞1及洞2衬砌位移影响趋势一致。在相同角度下,围岩弹性模量越大,衬砌总位移越小,洞1、洞2衬砌位移均呈现“W”型,位移递增趋势拐点均位于左右拱脚处;中导洞高宽比越大,中导洞截面越趋向“高窄”型,中导洞围岩与衬砌最大主应力均出现增大趋势;当中导洞尺寸不变时,将另一洞室截面尺寸增大及减小,变为对称施工条件时,原洞室衬砌位移也出现增大及减小趋势,且共用衬砌区域增大趋势更明显。

关键词: 双连拱隧道, 中导洞, Schwarz 交替法, 复变函数, 应力场, 位移场

Abstract: At present, theoretical analyses on double-arch tunnel construction effects have rarely considered the construction impacts induced by the middle guide tunnel, despite its prevalence in practical designs. During construction, the middle guide tunnel is excavated first, sharing its lining boundary with adjacent left (tunnel 1) and right (tunnel 2) caverns, while requiring backfilling and reconstruction of the central diaphragm wall. Based on complex variable function theory and the Schwarz alternating method, this study proposes a calculation approach for stress and deformation in lining-surrounding rock systems of double-arch tunnels incorporating middle guide tunnel effects. For the shared lining boundary between the middle guide tunnel and lateral caverns, the Cauchy integral method transforms boundary integral conditions into the difference between complete single-cavity integrals and shared boundary integrals. This aligns with the Schwarz alternating method’s concept of “additional surface forces” generated during three-cavity interaction analysis. Validation against monitoring data and numerical simulations from the Suzhou Qizi Mountain double-arch tunnel project confirms the feasibility of this complex function approach. Parametric sensitivity analyses were conducted for Poisson’s ratio, surrounding rock elastic modulus, middle guide tunnel aspect ratio, and double-arch symmetry. Key findings include: elastic modulus variations exhibit consistent impacts on Tunnel 1 and 2 lining displacements-higher modulus correlates with reduced total displacement at equivalent angles, showing “W”-shaped profiles with inflection points at arch springings. Increased middle guide tunnel aspect ratio (toward “tall-narrow” geometry) elevates maximum principal stresses in both surrounding rock and lining. Symmetrical enlargement/reduction of adjacent cavern sizes while maintaining middle guide tunnel dimensions amplifies/reduces original cavern lining displacements, particularly in shared lining regions.

Key words: continuous arch tunnel, middle guideway, Schwarz alternate method, complex variable function, stress field, displacement field

中图分类号: U455
[1] 韩晓玉, 郑炜烽, 董志宏, 张新辉, . 高水头抽水蓄能电站地应力综合测试及抗劈裂分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2167-2174.
[2] 汤华, 姜成业, 邓琴, 毕钛俊, 秦雨樵, . 浅埋无中导洞连拱隧道先行洞衬砌承担围岩荷载确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1170-1180.
[3] 毕钛俊, 邓琴, 汤华, 姜成业, 秦雨樵, . 基于复变函数理论的无中导连拱隧道应力与位移解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 777-787.
[4] 张家奇, 赵春风, 赵程, 吴悦, 龚昕, . 考虑弹塑性卸荷的柱孔和球孔反向扩张解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3224-3234.
[5] 齐飞飞, 张科, 谢建斌, . 基于DIC技术的含不同节理密度类岩石试件 破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1669-1680.
[6] 蒙伟, 何川, 陈子全, 郭德平, 周子寒, 寇昊, 吴枋胤, . 岭回归在岩体初始地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1156-1169.
[7] 陈念, 王成虎, 高桂云, 王璞, . 基于应力多边形与钻孔崩落的白鹤滩 右岸厂房区地应力场特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3376-3384.
[8] 王海军, 乐成军, 汤雷, 赵初, 李汉章, 戚海棠, . 基于3D-ILC含水平内裂纹脆性固体 三点弯断裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2773-2784.
[9] 刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 杨战标, 伯音, . 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[10] 赵红华, 刘聪, 唐小微, 魏焕卫, 朱丰, . 基于透明土和三维重构技术的空间变形可视 化测量系统的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3170-3180.
[11] 陈有亮, 刘耕云, 杜曦, RAFIG Azzam, 吴东鹏, . 考虑膨胀应力和剪胀的深埋隧道弹塑性解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2525-2535.
[12] 宋义敏, 张 悦, 许海亮, 王亚飞, 贺志杰. 基于非均匀特征的岩石蠕滑与黏滑变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[13] 张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层 变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[14] 周航, 袁井荣, 刘汉龙, 楚剑, . 矩形桩沉桩挤土效应透明土模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4429-4438.
[15] 冷伍明, 张期树, 徐方, 聂如松, 杨奇, 艾希, . 新型预应力路基坡面法向附加应力扩散规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3987-4000.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!