岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 271-284.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0454CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0454

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应

侯克鹏1, 2,江帆1, 2,张超3,龚晶汉3   

  1. 1. 昆明理工大学 国土资源工程学院,云南 昆明 650093;2. 昆明理工大学 云南省中−德蓝色矿山与特殊地下空间开发利用重点实验室, 云南 昆明 650093;3. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-15 接受日期:2024-11-14 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 江帆,男,1983年生,博士研究生,主要从事土?岩接触效应与滑动机理研究。E-mail: 27201759@qq.com
  • 作者简介:侯克鹏,男,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事安全工程、采矿工程和岩土工程等研究。E-mail: 496172617@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金(No.2023MD744275);岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室开放基金(No.E22308)

Surface morphology effect of soil-rock mixture-bedrock interface shear

HOU Ke-peng1, 2, JIANG Fan1, 2, ZHANG Chao3, GONG Jing-han3   

  1. 1. School of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, China; 2. Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sino-German Blue Mining and Utilization of Special Underground Space, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, China; 3. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • Received:2024-04-15 Accepted:2024-11-14 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-27
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023MD744275) and the Open Fund of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring (E22308).

摘要: 土石混合体−基岩接触面是下伏基岩堆积体边坡稳定性的主要控制面,基覆面形态特征是重要的设计内容。为此,开展了不同基覆面形态参数条件下接触面室内大型直剪试验,研究了基覆面形态参数对接触面剪切力学特性的影响,探讨了接触面土石颗粒运动概化模式,建立了接触面剪切简化的复合幂-指数模型(composite power exponential model,CPE模型)。结果表明:随着粗糙度的增加,接触面抗剪强度不断增大,表观内摩擦角和表观黏聚力分别呈非线性上凸增长和似线性增长趋势,随着锯齿高度的增加,接触面抗剪强度先增大后减小,增加锯齿高度对表观黏聚力的影响较为明显;接触面剪应力−剪切相对位移关系曲线基本呈弱硬化型,土石颗粒骨架密实度随粗糙度的增大而减小,但随锯齿高度的增大呈先增大后减小,接触面土石颗粒运动主要表现为咬合、翻转和滑移,较高法向应力时会发生颗粒破碎和基岩尖端剪切破坏;模型参数k、b和n与无量纲化法向应力n/Pa存在线性关系(n为法向应力,Pa为标准大气压),拟合系数i(i = 1,2)不受基覆面形态参数的影响,拟合系数i和i分别与粗糙度R和锯齿高度D存在线性关系;简化CPE模型能够很好地模拟出不同基覆面形态参数条件下土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切变形全过程,模型适用性良好,参数的确定方法合理且可行。

关键词: 土石混合体, 基岩界面, 形态参数, 剪切特性, 本构模型

Abstract: The soil-rock mixture-bedrock contact surface represents as the primary control interface for the stability of accumulated landslides, and the morphological characteristics of bedrock interface represent a pivotal element of the design. Large-scale direct shear tests were conducted on the contact surface under varying morphological parameters of the bedrock interface. The objective of these tests was to investigate the influence of the aforementioned parameters on the shear mechanical properties of the contact surface. A generalized model was developed to describe the movement of soil and rock particles at the contact surface. A simplified composite power exponential (CPE) model was established to describe the shear behavior of the contact surface. Results show that as the roughness of the contact surface increases, the shear strength of the contact surface progressively enhances. This is accompanied by a nonlinear upward convex growth trend in the apparent internal friction angle and a quasi-linear increase in the apparent cohesion. As the sawtooth height increases, the shear strength of the contact surface initially rises and subsequently declines. The impact on apparent cohesion is more pronounced when sawtooth height increases. The relationship curve between shear stress and shear relative displacement at the contact surface generally exhibits a weak hardening pattern. The compactness of the soil-rock particle skeleton is observed to decrease with increasing roughness, but to increase initially and then decrease with the elevation of sawtooth height. The movement of soil-rock particles at the contact surface is primarily characterized by interlocking, rolling and slipping, while particle fragmentation and shear failure at the bedrock tips occur under conditions of higher normal stress. The model parameters k, b, and n are found to exhibit a linear relationship with the dimensionless normal stress n/Pa. n is normal stress, and Pa is standard atmospheric pressure. The fitting coefficient ai (i = 1, 2) remains unaffected by the morphological parameters of the bedrock interface. Moreover, fitting coefficients bi and gi demonstrate a linear relationship with roughness R and sawtooth height D, respectively. The simplified CPE model effectively simulates the entire process of shear deformation at the soil-rock mixture-bedrock contact surface under varying morphological parameters of the bedrock interface. The model demonstrates good applicability, and the method for determining the parameters is both reasonable and feasible.

Key words: soil rock mixtures, bedrock interface, morphological parameters, shear characteristic, constitutive model

中图分类号: TU454
[1] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[2] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[3] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[4] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[5] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[6] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[7] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[8] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[9] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[10] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[11] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[12] 王番, 郅彬, 刘恩龙, 王小婵, 邓博团, 李金华, 张辉, . 考虑局部胶结破损热力学行为的结构性黄土二元介质本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 97-109.
[13] 薛阳, 苗发盛, 吴益平, 温韬, 王艳昆, . 土体本构模型参数的不确定性评估研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2797-2807.
[14] 樊培培, 张凌凯, 丁旭升, . 干湿-冻融循环条件下湿陷性黄土剪切及压缩特性的劣化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2050-2060.
[15] 周攀, 李镜培, 李盼盼, 刘耕云, 张超哲, . 基于界面本构模型的砂土中单桩荷载−沉降响应预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1686-1698.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!