岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 1-26.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0277CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0277

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

大规模CO2地质封存泄漏的问题、影响及管控——研究现状及展望

白冰1,郝敏1, 2,雷宏武1,杨横涛1,李采3, 4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国地质科学院,北京100037;4 自然资源部碳封存与地质储能工程技术创新中心,北京100037
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-16 接受日期:2025-05-09 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-07
  • 作者简介:白冰,男,1980年生,博士,研究员,主要从事碳中和岩土力学与工程方面的工作。E-mail: bai_bing@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金-地质联合基金重点项目(No.U2344226)

Leakage from large-scale CO2 geological storage: problems, consequences, and control — a review and perspective

BAI Bing1, HAO Min1, 2, LEI Hong-wu1, YANG Heng-tao1, LI Cai3, 4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China; 4. Technology Innovation Center for Carbon Sequestration and Geological Energy Storage, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100037, China
  • Received:2025-03-16 Accepted:2025-05-09 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Project of the Geology Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2344226).

摘要: 二氧化碳(CO2)地质封存作为碳捕集、利用与封存(carbon capture,utilization,and storage,简称CCUS)的核心环节,是削减温室气体排放的重要手段。随着封存规模的不断扩大,CO2泄漏风险的提高将威胁封存项目的安全性和有效性。首先,系统综述了大规模CO2地质封存中泄漏问题及研究现状,探讨了主要泄漏路径及其物理、化学和地质机制,重点分析了井筒、断层/裂隙和盖层等关键通道的泄漏行为,总结了CO2泄漏引发的灾害链及其对地下水、土壤微生物、植被和气候变化的潜在影响,梳理了泄漏监测与风险评估技术的最新进展,突出多源传感、智能分析和多尺度耦合模型的重要作用;然后,探讨了当前泄漏管控与修复的研究进展,包括水泥基材料、聚合物凝胶、生物矿化技术、泡沫技术及纳米技术的应用,指出了这些技术在长期稳定性和大规模封存应用中的局限性;最后,提出未来研究应聚焦泄漏路径机制识别、多源融合监测与智能预警以及适应复杂地质环境的快速响应修复系统,构建全周期的泄漏防控与管理框架。

关键词: CO2地质封存, 泄漏机制, 环境影响, 监测手段, 风险管控, 修复技术

Abstract: Geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2), a core component of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), is a key strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. However, the continuous expansion of storage capacity increases the risk of CO2 leakage, posing significant challenges to the safety and effectiveness of storage projects. Firstly, this study provides a comprehensive review of leakage issues and research progress in large-scale CO2 geological storage. We examine the primary leakage pathways and their underlying physical, chemical, and geological mechanisms, emphasizing wellbores, faults/fractures, and caprocks as critical conduits. We summarize the cascading effects of CO2 leakage, highlighting its potential impacts on groundwater, soil microorganisms, vegetation, and climate change. Then, we discuss recent advances in leakage monitoring and risk assessment, underscoring the roles of multi-source sensing, intelligent data analysis, and multi-scale coupled models. Furthermore, we review the progress of leakage control and remediation technologies, including cement-based materials, polymer gels, biomineralization, foam injection, and nanotechnology, while identifying limitations regarding long-term stability and large-scale applicability. Finally, we propose future research directions that focus on identifying leakage mechanisms, multi-source monitoring, intelligent early-warning systems, and rapid-response remediation strategies tailored to complex geological conditions, aiming to establish an integrated full-cycle leakage prevention and management framework.

Key words: CO2 geological storage, leakage mechanism, environmental impact, monitoring means, risk control, repair technology

中图分类号: TE 822
[1] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[2] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[3] 刘动, 林沛元, 李伟科, 黄胜, 马保松, . 跨孔CT岩溶识别方法准确性的统计学评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 822-834.
[4] 陈博文, 李琦, 谭永胜, 余涛, 高文彬, 李霞颖, 申筛成, . 不同有效应力下泥岩盖层二氧化碳突破压力演化特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3681-3693.
[5] 赵艳, 杨柳, 奚茹茹, 耿振坤, 张谦, 马雄德, . 基于核磁共振和磁共振成像的低渗透岩芯CO2-H2O两相驱替特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1636-1644.
[6] 李玉萍, 樊宝云, 董康冉, 万金忠, 艾英钵, 王保田, . 不同修复技术对石油烃污染粉质砂土工程特性 影响室内试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2833-2842.
[7] 王卫东,王浩然,徐中华. 上海地区基坑开挖数值分析中土体 HS-Small模型参数的研究[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1766-1774.
[8] 刘 博 ,李海波 ,冯海鹏 ,周青春 ,王 秒 ,宋全杰 . 强夯施工振动对海工防渗墙影响试验及安全监控[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3073-3080.
[9] 李兴高,孙河川. 地铁施工环境影响定量风险指标研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2733-2736.
[10] 冀红娟 ,杨春和 ,张 超 ,谢 婷 . 尾矿库环境影响指标体系及评价方法及其应用[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2087-2091.
[11] 郝荣福,胡黎明,邢巍巍. 土壤中可挥发性污染物清除的离心试验研究[J]. , 2004, 25(7): 1037-1040.
[12] 程祖锋 ,李 萍 ,谌会芹 ,石丙飞 ,房后国,. 某港口工程地基处理中的强夯振动效应研究[J]. , 2004, 25(5): 740-748.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!