岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 27-38.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0160CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0160

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑土体剪切和压缩耦合作用的节泡型锚杆蠕变模型研究

叶新宇1,王博1,张升1,刘蔚1,黄攀2,赵炳震3   

  1. 1.中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2.中铁二十五局集团第三工程有限公司,湖南 长沙 410001; 3.陕西建工集团股份有限公司,陕西 西安 710117
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-15 接受日期:2025-04-28 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-07
  • 通讯作者: 张升,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事计算土力学方面的科研工作。E-mail: shengzhang@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:叶新宇,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事边坡加固、地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: yexinyu113@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52478380,No.52578450);湖南省科技创新计划资助(No.2023RC1017)

A creep model for anchor with grout bulb considering shear and compression coupling effect of soil

YE Xin-yu1, WANG Bo1, ZHANG Sheng1, LIU Wei1, HUANG Pan2, ZHAO Bing-zhen3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. China Railway 25 Bureau Group Third Engineering Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan 410001, China; 3. Shaanxi Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710117, China
  • Received:2025-02-15 Accepted:2025-04-28 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478380, 52578450 ) and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2023RC1017).

摘要: 锚杆与土体之间的蠕变是决定锚杆预应力损失规律的关键因素,直接影响着边坡的长期稳定性。与传统锚杆不同,节泡型锚杆作为一种承压型锚杆,其预应力损失计算需要考虑与土体的剪切和压缩蠕变的耦合作用。因此,揭示节泡型锚杆与土体相互作用下的独特蠕变机制具有显著研究价值。首先,开展红黏土剪切和压缩蠕变试验,获取其蠕变参数;其次,利用自主研发的模型试验系统,开展节泡型锚杆蠕变特性试验;最后,基于分数阶微积分理论,建立考虑土体剪切和压缩蠕变耦合作用的分数阶节泡型锚杆蠕变模型。结果表明:相比于传统注浆锚杆,节泡型锚杆蠕变的衰减蠕变阶段持续时间较长,且衰减速率较慢;节泡型锚杆在红黏土中发生土体压缩蠕变占总蠕变的90%以上,且随时间增加而增大;建立的考虑土体剪切和压缩耦合蠕变的节泡型锚杆蠕变模型,能较好地描述节泡型锚杆-土体的蠕变行为。研究结果不仅能为新型节泡型预应力锚杆的设计和应用提供理论基础,而且能为节泡型预应力锚杆的服役性能评价提供依据。

关键词: 节泡型锚杆, 剪切与压缩, 蠕变, 红黏土, 耦合作用

Abstract: Creep between the anchor and the soil is a critical factor in determining the prestress loss of the anchor, directly influencing the long-term stability of the slope. Unlike traditional anchors, the prestress loss calculation for anchors with grout bulb, which serve as pressure-bearing anchors, must account for the coupling effects of soil shear and compression creep. Thus, revealing the unique creep mechanism resulting from the interaction between anchors with grout bulb and the soil holds significant research value. Firstly, shear and compression creep tests on red clay were conducted to obtain clays creep parameters. Secondly, a creep characteristic test for the grout bulb anchor was performed using a self-developed model test system. Finally, a fractional-order creep model for grout bulb anchors, incorporating the coupling effects of soil shear and compression creep, was established based on fractional calculus theory. The results indicate that, compared to traditional grouting anchors, the attenuation creep stage of anchors with grout bulb lasts longer and exhibits a slower attenuation rate. In red clay, compression creep accounts for over 90% of the total creep and increases over time. The anchor with grout bulb creep model, which considers the coupling creep of soil shear and compression, more accurately describes the creep behavior of anchors with grout bulb in soil. This study not only provides a theoretical basis for the design and application of the new type of prestressed anchor with grout bulb but also contributes to the broader understanding of prestressed anchors with grout bulb.

Key words: anchor with grout bulb, shear and compression, creep, red clay, coupled effect

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 王志良, 肖智桓, 申林方, 李邵军. 基于物理信息神经网络岩石裂隙渗流传热耦合作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 703-716.
[2] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[3] 段书苏, 候志强, 王志佳, 胡俊, 张友良, 张建经. D-山梨醇对微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积作用效果及加固红黏土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 238-248.
[4] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 常规三轴压缩条件下岩石蠕变破坏时间预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2011-2022.
[5] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[6] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[7] 朱元广, 王璇尧, 刘滨, 刘学伟, 薛皓元, 耿志, . 层状岩石横观各向同性蠕变损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1095-1108.
[8] 王学滨, 陈双印, 郑一方, 廖裴彬, . 考虑蠕变剪裂的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 613-624.
[9] 杨楠, 邓亚虹, 刘雪娅, 慕焕东. 黄土蠕变变形特征及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3797-3810.
[10] 王贺平, 宋洋, 毛镜涵, 周健华, 李昂, 赵立财, 李庆文. 恒定法向刚度边界下加锚充填节理岩体宏细观剪切蠕变力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3823-3840.
[11] 潘超钒, 张晨, 张星星, 蔡正银, 王旭东, . 盐渍化粉土的蠕变特征及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3383-3394.
[12] 杨松, 王俊光, 韦忠跟, 辛天宇, 梁冰, 王立轩, 任凌冉. 衰减振荡扰动下砂岩蠕变特性与模型初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3485-3500.
[13] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[14] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
[15] 樊赖宇, 吴志军, 储昭飞, 翁磊, 王智洋, 刘泉声, 陈结, . 动态冲击下红砂岩蠕变特性及损伤本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1608-1622.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!