岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3525-3536.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1143CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1143

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

定向聚能结构下静态致裂煤岩体试验研究

程虹铭1,兰永青1,乔元栋1,杨小彬2,赵振宝3,郝泳旭1, 周敏甲1,杨泽远1   

  1. 1.山西大同大学 煤炭工程学院,山西 大同 037003;2.中国矿业大学(北京)应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083; 3.太原科技大学 安全与应急管理工程学院,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-24 接受日期:2026-04-13 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 乔元栋,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事矿山灾害防治方面的研究工作。E-mail: dtdxqyd@126.com
  • 作者简介:程虹铭,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事矿山灾害防治及智能监测预警技术等方面的研究工作。E-mail: cheng126121@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山西省基础研究计划项目(No.202303021222203);大同市重点研发项目(No.2025007);山西大同大学博士科研启动项目(No.2022-B-10);山西大同大学基础科研基金(No.2022K3)。

Experimental study on static fracturing of coal and rock mass using directional energy-concentrating structure

CHENG Hong-ming1, LAN Yong-qing1, QIAO Yuan-dong1, YANG Xiao-bin2, ZHAO Zhen-bao3, HAO Yong-xu1, ZHOU Min-jia1, YANG Ze-yuan1   

  1. 1. School of Coal Engineering, Shanxi Datong University, Datong, Shanxi 037003, China; 2. School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 3. School of Safety and Emergency Management Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2025-10-24 Accepted:2026-04-13 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (202303021222203), the Key Research and Development Project of Datong City (2025007), the Doctoral Research Project of Shanxi Datong University (2022-B-10) and the Basic Research Fund of Shanxi Datong University (2022K3).

摘要: 针对常规灌注式静态致裂煤岩体中致裂方向随机、能量利用效率低及冲孔频发等技术难题,提出了一种基于定向聚能结构的静态致裂方法,并通过搭建的静态致裂煤岩试验平台,系统开展了常规灌注、定向结构与定向聚能结构3种装药形式下的静态致裂对比试验。试验以晋北地区煤矿坚硬顶板砂岩为对象,采用人工类岩石材料制备含不同致裂钻孔的立方体试件,利用数字图像相关技术全程监测致裂裂纹动态扩展行为,引入平均裂纹起裂时间、平均破裂张开度和致裂裂纹扩展速率3个量化指标,综合评价不同装药结构下的静态致裂效果。结果表明,定向聚能结构可有效引导静态破碎剂膨胀应力沿预设方向集中释放,显著抑制能量散逸,实现裂纹的定向启裂与扩展。宏观上,定向聚能结构试验的试件破裂面更为平整、完整,表现出明显的定向发力―线式开裂―面式贯通三阶段演化特征;细观应变场显示,其位移梯度与应变集中程度远高于常规灌注式与定向结构试验,最大表观位移量达2.98 mm。以致裂孔径50 mm试件为例,其致裂裂纹起裂时间为23.8 min,平均破裂张开度为2.89 mm,裂纹扩展速率达1.46 m/s,较常规灌注式试验分别提升了36.2%、56.8%与99.3%,较定向试验分别提升了14.7%、51.7%与92.8%,验证了定向聚能结构在静态致裂中的力学优越性与工艺可行性,为静态致裂技术处置深部高应力、坚硬岩体弱化卸压提供了理论与试验依据。

关键词: 静态致裂, 定向聚能, 膨胀应力, 裂纹扩展, 数字图像相关技术

Abstract: To address the technical challenges of random crack direction, low energy utilization efficiency, and frequent blowouts in conventional perfusion static fracturing of coal and rock masses, a static fracturing method based on a directional energy-concentrating structure is proposed. Comparative experiments were conducted using three charging forms—conventional perfusion, directional structure, and directional energy-concentrating structure—on a self-built static fracturing test platform for coal and rock. The experiments utilized artificial rock-like materials to prepare cubic specimens with different borehole diameters, simulating the hard roof sandstone in the northern region of Shanxi province. The dynamic propagation of cracks was monitored in real time using digital image correlation technology. Three quantitative indicators—average crack initiation time, average fracture aperture, and crack propagation rate—were introduced to comprehensively evaluate the static fracturing effects under different charging structures. The results demonstrate that the directional energy-concentrating structure effectively guides the concentrated release of expansion stress from the static cracking agent along a predetermined direction, significantly suppressing energy dissipation and enabling directional crack initiation and propagation. Macroscopically, specimens tested with the directional energy-concentrating structure exhibited flatter and more integrated fracture surfaces, showing a clear three-stage evolution characteristic: “directional force application–linear cracking–planar coalescence.” Mesoscopic strain field analysis revealed that the displacement gradient and strain concentration were significantly higher than those in conventional perfusion and directional structure tests, with a maximum apparent displacement vector of 2.98 mm. For instance, in specimens with a 50 mm borehole diameter, the crack initiation time was 23.8 min, the average fracture aperture was 2.89 mm, and the crack propagation rate reached 1.46 m/s. These values represent improvements of 36.2%, 56.8%, and 99.3%, respectively, compared to conventional perfusion tests, and 14.7%, 51.7%, and 92.8% compared to directional structure tests. The findings validate the mechanical superiority and technical feasibility of the directional energy-concentrating structure in static fracturing, providing a theoretical and experimental basis for applying static fracturing technology to weaken and relieve pressure in deep high-stress hard rock masses.

Key words: static fracturing, directional energy concentration, expansion stress, crack propagation, digital image correlation technology

中图分类号: TU 456
[1] 陈骞, 申林方, 王志良, 李松波, 华涛, 徐则民. 温度预处理对裂隙岩体破坏行为的影响:基于热-力耦合近场动力学模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2824-2837.
[2] 周辉, 齐资源, 卢景景, 肖建成. TBM双刃滚刀贯入红砂岩破岩特征与裂纹扩展机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2568-2580.
[3] 姜明伟, 梁运涛, 薛珊珊, 李海涛, 何团, 杨成, 杨冠宇, 马举, 彭超. 低频扰动下含孔砂岩渐进破裂演化及力学响应特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2041-2054.
[4] 张波波, 马芹永, . 氧化石墨烯和纳米二氧化硅增强模拟月壤地聚合物的制备及性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 607-626.
[5] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[6] 李满, 辛昊哲, 刘先珊, 张帆, 胡大伟, 杨福见, . 基于修正相场模型的岩体混合模式破裂数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2600-2612.
[7] 马鹏飞, 张艺晨, 袁超, 徐茂洲, 郭小雄, . 软弱层岩体间隔破裂现象的近场动力学方法模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2296-2307.
[8] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[9] 周建, 廖星川, 刘福深, 尚肖楠, 沈君逸, . 应用卷积近场动力学快速模拟随机裂纹扩展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 625-639.
[10] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[11] 张红日, 杨济铭, 徐永福, 肖杰, 韩仲, 汪磊, 林宇亮, . 基于数字图像相关技术的膨胀土三维裂隙扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 309-323.
[12] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[13] 张朝俊, 吴顺川, 储超群, 庞瑞, . 裂隙砂岩应变场演化与超声时移衰减特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1284-1296.
[14] 张宪尚, 文光才, 朱哲明, 隆清明, 刘杰, . 冲击荷载下充填节理岩体I型裂纹动态扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 396-406.
[15] 彭阳, 高永涛, 王文林, 甫尔卡特, 温建敏, 周喻, . 单侧限压缩煤岩组合体的破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 387-398.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!