岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3602-3614.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1120CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1120

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂岩气藏储气库近井筒应力场演化及出砂预测研究——以X23储气库为例

袁武韬1, 2,贾善坡2,温曹轩2,刘团辉3,陈志鑫3,王薇3,翟羽佳3   

  1. 1.东北石油大学 土木建筑工程学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318;2.东北石油大学 环渤海能源研究院,河北 秦皇岛 066004; 3.中国石油天然气股份有限公司华北油田 河北储气库分公司,河北 廊坊 065000
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-23 接受日期:2026-01-26 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 贾善坡,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气圈闭安全评价及地下储气库等研究。Email: jiashanporsm@163.com
  • 作者简介:袁武韬,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事油气藏储层岩石力学的研究。E-mail: 2108211517@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(42072166);黑龙江省重点研发计划(No.JD2023SJ26)。

Near-wellbore stress field evolution and sand production prediction in sandstone gas reservoir storage: a case study of the X23 storage

YUAN Wu-tao1, 2, JIA Shan-po2, WEN Cao-xuan2, LIU Tuan-hui3, CHEN Zhi-xin3, WANG Wei3, ZHAI Yu-jia3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China; 2. Bohai-Rim Energy Research Institute, Northeast Petroleum University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China; 3. Hebei Gas Storage Branch, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Langfang, Hebei 065000, China
  • Received:2025-10-23 Accepted:2026-01-26 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42072166) and the Key R&D Program of Heilongjiang Province of China (JD2023SJ26).

摘要: 砂岩储层是主要的地下油气储集空间类型,地下储气库交变注采会加剧岩石结构破坏出砂,研究储层出砂临界生产压差有利于其安全稳定运行。储气库交变注采下储层应力场分布及演化规律是研究出砂的基础,基于弹性力学推导了远井、近井储层应力场演化规律,利用交变损伤推导了临界出砂压差模型;具体分析了应力场机制、距井眼中心距离、井周角等参数对近井储层应力场演化规律的影响;以X23储气库工程为例,利用近井区域应力集中交变和气水界面特点,设计并进行逐级交变力学试验;分析了出砂临界生产压差的随注采周期次数变化趋势,并结合实际生产曲线绘制了出砂临界生产压差图版。研究结果表明,饱和度越低、粒径越细的储层,承受交变损伤能力越强;损伤随周期次数增加而累积,上限运行压力出砂压差由22.4 MPa单调降低至10.5 MPa,下限运行压力出砂压差由15.8 MPa单调降低至3.9 MPa。本研究为储气库出砂交变损伤试验设计提供了一种新方式,修正了出砂临界生产压差公式,指导了储气库注采运行中生产压差控制。

关键词: 地下储气库, 储层应力, 交变荷载, 出砂, 临界生产压差

Abstract: Sandstone reservoirs are the principal type of underground hydrocarbon storage reservoirs. Cyclic injection and production in underground gas-storage facilities increase rock damage and sand production. Understanding the critical drawdown pressure for reservoir sand production supports safe and stable operation. The distribution and evolution of stress fields in reservoirs under cyclic injection-production form the foundation for studying sand production. Based on elastic mechanics, the evolution patterns of stress fields in both distant- and near-wellbore reservoirs were derived. Utilizing cyclic damage theory, a critical drawdown pressure model was developed. The study specifically analyzed the influence of parameters such as stress field mechanism, distance from the wellbore center, and annular angle on the evolution of stress fields in near-wellbore reservoirs. Taking the X23 gas storage reservoir project as an example, stepwise cyclic mechanical tests were designed and conducted, leveraging stress concentration in the near-wellbore region and gas-water interface characteristics. The trend of critical drawdown pressure with injection-production cycle frequency was analyzed, and a critical drawdown pressure chart was developed based on actual production curves. Results indicate that reservoirs with lower water saturation and finer grain size exhibit greater resistance to cyclic damage. Damage accumulates with increasing cycle count. The critical drawdown pressure at the upper operating pressure limit decreased monotonically from 22.4 MPa to 10.5 MPa, while at the lower operating pressure limit it decreased monotonically from 15.8 MPa to 3.9 MPa. This study provides a novel approach for designing cyclic damage experiments in gas storage reservoirs, refines the critical drawdown pressure formula for sand production, and guides drawdown pressure control during injection and production operations in gas storage facilities.

Key words: underground gas storage, reservoir stress, alternating load, sand production, critical drawdown pressure

中图分类号: TE 822
[1] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[2] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[3] 刘元玺, 李银平, 施锡林, 赵凯, . 盐穴储气库微渗层注浆封堵试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 23-34.
[4] 蒋中明, 刘澧源, 赵海斌, 唐 栋, 胡 炜, 梅松华, 李 鹏, . 地下储气库热力耦合数值分析动态边界条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1149-1157.
[5] 张强勇 ,王保群 ,向 文,. 盐岩地下储气库风险评价层次分析模型及应用[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2299-2306.
[6] 刘先珊 ,许 明 . 基于三维流-固耦合模型的油井出砂细观机制研究[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2363-2370.
[7] 段 抗 ,张强勇 ,向 文 ,蔡 兵 ,许孝滨 ,贾 超 ,刘 健 . 盐岩地下储气库注采气套管运行安全的物理模型试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1605-1612.
[8] 刘艳辉,李 晓,李守定,赫建明. 盐岩地下储气库泥岩夹层分布与组构特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3627-3632.
[9] 裴桂红 ,刘建军 ,曾流芳 ,梁 冰,. 疏松砂岩油藏大孔道流体-砂粒两相运移的机理分析[J]. , 2005, 26(S2): 207-210.
[10] 陆 杨,徐千军. 交变载荷作用下边坡的安定性分析[J]. , 2004, 25(11): 1693-1697.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!