岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 437-469.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0743CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0743

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

咸水层压缩CO2储能的关键地质力学问题及研究建议

何淼1, 2,李霞颖1, 2,李琦1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-16 接受日期:2025-11-24 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 李琦,男,1972年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事二氧化碳地质封存技术研究。E-mail: qli@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:何淼,男,1994年生,博士,博士后,主要从事地中能源开发与储存过程中的地质力学问题研究。E-mail: 18846440413@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. U23A20671);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(No. 2021ZD0034)

Key geomechanical issues and research recommendations for compressed CO2 energy storage in saline aquifers

HE Miao1, 2, LI Xia-ying1, 2, LI Qi1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2025-07-16 Accepted:2025-11-24 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U23A20671) and the Major Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology (2021ZD0034).

摘要: 作为深度融合CO2地质封存与压缩气体储能的创新型能源技术,咸水层压缩CO2储能通过将CO2作为循环工质,同步实现大规模碳封存与电网级储能的双重收益,充分契合我国能源转型与“双碳”目标的发展需求,具有广阔的应用前景。然而,当前关于咸水层压缩CO2储能的研究大多聚焦于地上系统的优化方面,而对决定整个工程成败的地下因素关注较少。为此,围绕咸水层压缩CO2储能的关键地质力学问题展开综述,首先梳理了国内外各类压缩气体储能技术的发展现状,介绍了咸水层压缩CO2储能系统的基本原理与工作特点;其次归纳了CO2的热力学特性,点明了CO2工质相比于空气的优势;然后阐述了储能系统地质体面临的关键地质力学问题,其中详细讨论了系统建设和运营期间CO2-咸水-岩石之间的多场耦合作用机制及其可能引发的一系列稳定性和密封性问题,包括地层及地表变形、出砂、盖层疲劳与破裂、断层活化与诱震、盖层/断层密封机制以及泄漏模式等;最后总结了当前咸水层压缩CO2储能研究中存在的不足和挑战,并针对性地提出了若干研究建议。

关键词: 咸水层, 压缩CO2储能, 地质力学, 稳定性, 密封性

Abstract: As an innovative energy technology that deeply integrates CO2 geological sequestration with compressed gas energy storage, compressed CO2 storage in saline aquifer achieves dual benefits by using CO2 as a circulating working fluid, simultaneously enabling large-scale carbon sequestration and grid-level energy storage. This technology aligns well with China's strategic development needs for energy transition and the “dual carbon” goals, offering broad application prospects. However, current research on compressed CO2 energy storage in saline aquifer primarily focuses on optimizing ground systems, with limited attention given to the underground factors that ultimately determine the success or failure of the entire project. Therefore, this paper reviews the key geomechanical issues related to compressed CO2 energy storage in saline aquifer. First, it summarizes state of the art in compressed gas energy storage technologies worldwide, and introduces the basic principles and operational characteristics of compressed CO2 energy storage in saline aquifer systems. Second, it summarizes the thermodynamic properties of CO2, highlighting the advantages of CO2 as a working fluid compared to air. Third, it addresses key geomechanical challenges facing geological storage systems, detailing the multiphase coupling mechanisms between CO2, brine, and rock during system construction and operation. It examines the potential stability and integrity issues arising from these interactions, including formation and surface deformation, sand production, caprock fatigue and fracturing, fault reactivation and induced seismicity, sealing mechanisms of caprock/faults, and leakage pathways. Finally, it summarizes the shortcomings and challenges in current research on compressed CO2 energy storage in saline aquifer and proposes several research recommendations.

Key words: saline aquifer, compressed CO2 energy storage, geomechanics, stability, sealing

中图分类号: X45
[1] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[2] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[3] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[4] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[5] 李邵军, 张世殊, 李永红, 柳秀洋, 李治国, 徐鼎平, 程丽娟, 江权, 汤大明, 陈刚, . 双江口水电站极高应力大型地下厂房硬岩破坏机制与稳定性控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1581-1594.
[6] 杨柳, 吉明秀, 赵艳, 耿振坤, 李思源, 马雄德, 张谦, . 致密砂岩孔隙结构对两相驱替特征及CO2封存效率的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1187-1195.
[7] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[8] 孙文超, 王君豪, 徐文杰, 董晓阳, 任禾, 王洪兵, 张学杰, 王恒威, . 基于物质点法的高速公路弃渣场稳定性及 灾害动力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 991-1000.
[9] 曹虎, 张广清, 李世远, 汪文瑞, 谢彭旭, 孙伟, 李帅, . 基于断裂过程区的压裂驱油水力裂缝 扩展模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 798-810.
[10] 叶斌, 蒋记澳, 朱家志, 丁源, 林创基. 电解减饱和处理后砂土的非饱和状态稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3673-3682.
[11] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[12] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[13] 郭晓刚, 马垒, 张超, 淦树成, 王华, 甘一雄, 周通, . 软弱基底排土场边坡逆排堆高速率及稳定性控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
[14] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[15] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!