岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 647-658.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0199CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0199

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于能量准则的超低摩擦型冲击地压发生机制研究

胡学锦1,李利萍1,陈帅1,潘一山2   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000;2. 辽宁大学 灾害岩体力学研究所,辽宁 沈阳 110036
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-25 接受日期:2025-05-16 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 李利萍,女,1983年生,博士,教授,主要从事深部煤岩动力灾害方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:liliping@lntu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:胡学锦,女,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事深部煤岩动力灾害方面的研究工作。E-mail:huxuejin_hyll@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51974148);辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”项目(No. XLYC1807130)

Occurrence mechanism of ultra-low friction-typed rockburst based on energy criterion

HU Xue-jin1, LI Li-ping1, CHEN Shuai1, PAN Yi-shan2   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 2. Institute of Disaster Rock Mechanics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110036, China
  • Received:2025-02-25 Accepted:2025-05-16 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51974148) and the Liaoning Xingliao Talent Program (XLYC1807130).

摘要: 为揭示超低摩擦型冲击地压发生机制,以深部煤岩体为研究对象,首先采用自主研制的超低摩擦试验装置在实验室模拟了超低摩擦型冲击地压灾害,并利用高速相机、声发射等设备记录了煤层断裂及超低摩擦滑移失稳挤压巷道动态变化过程。结合试验结果和工程实例建立了超低摩擦型冲击地压力学模型,并基于能量准则给出了超低摩擦型冲击地压能量判据。以煤岩界面摩擦力、竖向位移差、断裂煤层长度为指标,对刚度、阻尼、扰动振幅、频率、模量比等参数进行了分析。研究结果表明:增大结构面刚度系数或阻尼系数,可减少超低摩擦型冲击地压发生的可能性,或降低其强度;扰动幅值越大,煤层越容易发生超低摩擦滑动;相比于其他扰动频率,当频率为14~16 Hz时煤层更易发生超低摩擦滑动;煤岩界面摩擦特性较为相近的情况下,模量比越大,煤层断裂位置越靠近巷道,断裂煤层越容易发生超低摩擦滑动。该研究结果对冲击地压的预测和防治具有重要意义。

关键词: 煤岩界面, 超低摩擦效应, 煤层断裂, 冲击地压, 能量判据, 摩擦力

Abstract: To reveal the occurrence mechanism of ultra-low friction-typed rockburst, deep coal-rock is used as the study material. Firstly, a self-developed ultra-low friction experimental device was used to reproduce the ultra-low friction-typed rockburst under laboratory conditions. A high-speed camera and an acoustic-emission system were used to capture the dynamic fracture evolution of the coal seam and the associated roadway squeezing induced by unstable ultra-low-friction slip. Based on laboratory tests and engineering examples, we established a model of ultra-low friction-typed rockburst and derived an energy index using an energy-based criterion., and the energy index of the ultra-low friction-typed rockburst is given based on energy criterion. Using the coal–rock interfacial friction force, vertical displacement difference, and fractured-seam length as key indices, we evaluated how stiffness, damping, perturbation amplitude, perturbation frequency, and elastic-modulus ratio affect the ultra-low friction response. The results show that increasing the stiffness or damping coefficient of the structural plane reduces the possibility of ultra-low friction sliding or mitigates its intensity. High disturbance amplitude is more prone to induce ultra-low friction sliding of the coal seam. Compared to other disturbance frequencies, the disturbance frequency between 14 Hz and 16 Hz most likely trigger ultra-low friction sliding. When the coal–rock interfacial friction forces are comparable, a higher coal elastic-modulus ratio more readily induces ultra-low friction sliding in the fractured coal seam. These findings provide a basis for predicting and preventing rockburst hazards.

Key words: coal-rock interface, ultra-low friction effect, coal seam fracture, rockburst, energy index, friction force

中图分类号: TD 324
[1] 谭健, 刘学生, 耿艳峰, 付彪, 王洪磊, 许珂, . 防冲钻机钻测智能化试验平台研制及初步应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 673-684.
[2] 徐东, 高明仕, 郑锐, . 同采工作面厚硬顶板破断诱冲机制及防控技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3219-3233.
[3] 李利萍, 余泓浩, 李秋雨, 潘一山, . 含水煤块超低摩擦效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3093-3103.
[4] 李利萍, 胡学锦, 潘一山, 李明会, . 煤的冲击倾向性对深部煤岩界面超低摩擦效应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1633-1642.
[5] 李浩哲, 姜在炳, 范宗洋, 庞涛, 刘修刚, . 跨煤岩界面穿层压裂裂缝动态扩展特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 737-749.
[6] 高明仕, 俞鑫, 徐东, 贺永亮, 赵世帆, . 基于冲能吸能平衡效应的冲击地压巷道分级支护研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 38-48.
[7] 王书文, 鞠文君, 张春会, 苏士杰, 陆闯, . 弹脆性圆形煤巷应力跃升及冲击地压预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 873-883.
[8] 王凯兴, 薛佳琪, 潘一山, 窦林名, 肖永惠, . 顶板−支护系统准共振诱发冲击地压机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 717-727.
[9] 陈光波, 张俊文, 贺永亮, 张国华, 李谭, . 煤岩组合体峰前能量分布公式推导及试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 130-143.
[10] 杨 科, 刘文杰, 马衍坤, 许日杰, 池小楼, . 真三轴单面临空下煤岩组合体冲击 破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 15-27.
[11] 吴振华, 潘鹏志, 潘俊锋, 王兆丰, 高家明. 地堑构造区冲击地压发生机制及矿震活动规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2225-2238.
[12] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
[13] 姚精明, 许自文, 王建, 王路. 锚杆−泡沫铝联合支护防治冲击地压试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 620-626.
[14] 马冰, 王学滨, 田锋, . 基于两种数值模拟方法的围岩脆性破坏 特征对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3440-3450.
[15] 陈光波, 秦忠诚, 张国华, 李谭, 李敬凯, . 受载煤岩组合体破坏前能量分布规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2021-2033.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!