岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 1056-1066.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0263CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0263

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于岩石整体破坏准则深埋隧洞岩爆判据

魏士炎,郭建强,粟磊, 李育   

  1. 贵州大学 土木工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-13 接受日期:2025-06-17 出版日期:2026-03-17 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 作者简介:魏士炎,男,2001年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学理论与岩爆方面的工作。E-mail: 1224928765@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41372356);贵州省自然科学基金(黔科合基础-ZK[2023]一般068)。

Rockburst criterion for deep-buried tunnels based on rock integrity failure criterion

WEI Shi-yan, GUO Jian-qiang, SU Lei, LI Yu   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
  • Received:2025-03-13 Accepted:2025-06-17 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-03-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41372356) and Guizhou Province Science Foundation (ZK[2023] 068).

摘要: 岩爆是深部矿产资源开发与地下工程建设中亟待解决的关键科学难题之一。基于弹性应变能与岩石整体破坏准则,结合深埋隧洞开挖完成后围岩二次应力分布,建立岩爆倾向性多因素综合判据模型。研究表明,该判据考虑了岩体切向应力与径向应力、岩体完整性、泊松比及围岩开挖二次应力分布效应,还考虑了岩爆孕育3种要素:应力状态、结构完整性和材料脆性特性。根据岩爆活动强度差异,将其划分为无、弱、中等及强烈4个等级,并确定3个分级阈值为2.5、8.1、25.7,并讨论了各参数的敏感性特征。结果表明,岩体切向应力与抗压强度之比对岩爆烈度分级影响最大,在其大于0.75时,更容易发生强岩爆;当其接近0.40时,更容易发生中等岩爆。通过国内典型深埋隧洞工程案例的实证分析显示,判据的预测结果与实际岩爆情况基本吻合,且与经典岩爆判据具有较好的一致性,具有良好的准确性和适用性。提出的能量−应力协同作用岩爆判据,希望为深埋隧洞应变型岩爆预测提供一种新思路。

关键词: 岩石力学, 岩爆判据, 弹性应变能, 深埋隧洞

Abstract: Rockburst is one of the critical scientific challenges demanding urgent resolution in deep mineral resource exploitation and underground engineering construction. Based on elastic strain energy and the rock integrity failure criterion, combined with the secondary stress distribution of surrounding rock after deep-buried tunnel excavation, this study establishes a multi-factor integrated criterion model for evaluating rockburst propensity. Results demonstrate that the proposed criterion systematically synthesizes key parameters including rock mass tangential and radial stresses, rock integrity, Poisson’s ratio characteristics, and secondary stress redistribution effects, while specifically integrating three essential factors governing rockburst initiation: stress concentration state, structural integrity condition, and material brittleness property. Based on the intensity variation of rockburst activity, the classification system is established with four distinct grades: none, weak, moderate, and intense, with three classification thresholds determined at 2.5, 8.1, and 25.7, respectively. The sensitivity characteristics of each parameter were also discussed. The results show that the ratio of tangential stress to compressive strength of the rock mass has the greatest influence on the classification of rockburst intensity. When this ratio exceeds 0.75, intense rockburst is more likely to occur; when it approaches 0.40, moderate rockburst is more likely to occur. Empirical investigations incorporating case studies of representative deep tunnel projects across China demonstrate that the criterion’s predictive outcomes exhibit strong alignment with actual rockburst manifestations while maintaining robust consistency with classical rockburst criteria, thereby demonstrating enhanced predictive accuracy and broad applicability. The developed energy-stress synergistic rockburst criterion offers an innovative methodology for strain-type rockburst prediction in deep tunneling engineering.

Key words: rock mechanics, rockburst criterion, elastic strain energy, deep-buried tunnel

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 邓祥辉, 贾泽旭, 张巍, 王睿, 史峻昕, 任亚军. 考虑非线性的Snishihara蠕变本构模型及开发应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 743-754.
[2] 田威, 贾祎恒, 云伟, 余宸, 程续. 脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉积对3D打印类砂岩试样力学性能与微观结构的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 767-779.
[3] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[4] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[5] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[6] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[7] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[8] 马语航, 何明明, 李宁, . XCY-2旋切触探系统研发及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1025-1038.
[9] 李利萍, 余泓浩, 李秋雨, 潘一山, . 含水煤块超低摩擦效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3093-3103.
[10] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 基于声发射特征参数的砂岩节理直剪破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 167-177.
[11] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[12] 苗柯韩, 黄勇, 马晓凡, 王超琦. 基于分形理论的岩体粗糙裂隙中溶质运移预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2527-2538.
[13] 卢英瑞, 冯现大, 刘日成, 李树忱, 胡明慧, 董峰吉, . 卸载速率对卸载诱发注浆加固节理岩体滑移行为影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2397-2410.
[14] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 程胜锦, 田世轩, 陈岩, . 不同控制方式和卸荷应力路径下类岩石节理剪切强度特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2061-2071.
[15] 余云燕, 丁小刚, 马丽娜, 崔文豪, 杜乾中. 微膨胀泥岩地基原位水分入渗响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 647-658.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!