岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 869-881.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0258CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0258

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同应力路径下黄土变形特性及四模量非线性模型研究

张彬1,邵帅1,邵生俊1, 2,齐磊3,王泽驰1,赵梓君1   

  1. 1. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048;2. 陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室,陕西 西安 710048; 3. 陕西地矿区研院有限公司,陕西 咸阳 712099
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-12 接受日期:2025-06-19 出版日期:2026-03-17 发布日期:2026-03-18
  • 通讯作者: 邵帅,男,1991年生,博士,副教授,主要从事黄土力学及土动力学方面的研究。E-mail: 315602024@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张彬,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事黄土力学与土动力学方面的研究。E-mail: 956870596@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.52108342);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划-引汉济渭联合基金项目(No.2019JLP-21,No.2019JLZ-13);陕西省水利科技计划项目(No.2021slkj-12)。

Deformation characteristics of loess under different stress paths and development of a four-modulus nonlinear model

ZHANG Bin1, SHAO Shuai1, SHAO Sheng-jun1, 2, QI Lei3, WANG Ze-chi1, ZHAO Zi-jun1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 3. Regional Geological Survey Academe of Shaanxi Geology and Mining Group Co., Ltd., Xianyang, Shaanxi 712099, China
  • Received:2025-03-12 Accepted:2025-06-19 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-03-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108342), the Basic Research Program of Natural Science in Shaanxi Province-Han-Wei Joint Found Project (2019JLP-21, 2019JLZ-13) and Shaanxi Water Science and Technology Program Project (2021slkj-12).

摘要: 为研究不同应力路径下黄土的变形特性,采用双向三轴仪进行等q(q为偏应力)压缩试验、等p(p为球应力)剪切试验和等应力比试验,系统分析了球应力和偏应力对体应变和剪应变的交叉影响机制。试验结果表明,球应力不仅产生体应变,也因各向异性导致径向应变大于轴向应变(约5.79倍),产生负的剪应变;偏应力产生剪应变的同时也会伴随约1%~3%的剪缩体变。这表明黄土的变形受球应力和偏应力共同支配,形成p-vp、q-vq、p-sp、q-sq(vp、vq和sp、sq分别为球应力、偏应力引起的体应变和剪应变)4类交叉应力−应变关系。鉴于传统模型难以描述此类交叉关系,在K-G模型(K为体积模量,G为剪切模量)框架基础上拓展,在原有体积模量Kt和剪切模量Gt的基础上增加了交叉模量J1和J2,分别量化偏应力引起的体应变和球应力引起的剪应变,并引入应力比硬化系数,构建了能够反映黄土各向异性和剪缩特性的四模量增量非线性本构模型。通过求解模型参数并与试验数据进行对比,验证了该模型在不同加载路径下预测黄土力学响应的准确性。研究成果为深入理解黄土的力学行为及其工程应用提供了新的方法和理论依据。

关键词: 黄土, 应力路径, K-G模型, 耦合加载

Abstract: To investigate the deformation characteristics of loess under different stress paths, a bi-directional triaxial apparatus was used to perform constant q compression tests (q is deviatoric stress), constant p shear tests (p is spherical stress), and constant stress ratio tests. The cross-influence mechanism of spherical stress and deviatoric stress on volumetric strain and shear strain was systematically analyzed. The experimental results indicate that the spherical stress not only generates volumetric strain, but also results in radial strain being greater than axial strain (about 5.79 times) due to anisotropy, leading to negative shear strain; while the deviatoric stress generates shear strain, it is also accompanied by approximately 1%―3% shear-induced volumetric shrinkage. This indicates that the deformation of loess is jointly dominated by spherical stress and deviatoric stress, forming 4 types of cross stress-strain relationships: p-vp, q-vq, p-sp, and q-sq (where vp and vq are the volumetric strains caused by spherical stress and deviatoric stress, respectively; sp and sq are the shear strains caused by spherical stress and deviatoric stress, respectively). Given that traditional models are difficult to describe such cross relationships, this study extends the K-G model framework (where K is the bulk modulus and G is the shear modulus) by adding cross moduli J1 and J2 on the basis of the original bulk modulus Kt and shear modulus Gt, quantifying the volumetric strain caused by deviatoric stress and the shear strain caused by spherical stress, respectively. By introducing the stress ratio hardening coefficient, a four-modulus incremental nonlinear constitutive model capable of reflecting the anisotropy and shear shrinkage characteristics of loess is developed. By solving the model parameters and comparing them with experimental data, the accuracy of the model in predicting the mechanical response of loess under different loading paths was validated. The research provides new methods and theoretical foundations for a deeper understanding of the mechanical behavior of loess and its engineering applications.

Key words: loess, stress path, K-G model, coupled loading

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 姜景山, 左永振, 程展林, 潘家军, 黄鑫, 占飞杰. 粗粒料力学特性的应力路径大型真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 755-766.
[2] 马渊博, 董旭光, 胡倩倩, 黄德昭. 钙源对大豆脲酶固化黄土强度和水稳定性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 939-950.
[3] 贺文昊, 田威, 云伟, 李璐, 赵航宇, 弋郭洋. 响应面法优化靶向激活微生物固化黄土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 659-673.
[4] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[5] 姜海波, 刘建锋, 张军, 鲁功达, 谢良甫. 长距离输水渠道黄土湿陷性及微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 61-72.
[6] 王化哲, 刘观仕, 张跃缤, 田升奎, 林贤龙, 后培升. 基于非接触式温度场及湿度场测试技术的黄土水热向上迁移试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 73-87.
[7] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[8] 吴子龙, 俞韬, 闫超, 邓永锋, 胡广青, 高宇航, 王璋, 王力, . 陕西黄土重金属污染分析与黄土/膨润土隔离墙处治初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[9] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[10] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[11] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[12] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[13] 亢佳伟, 邓国华, 李开超, 王丽琴, . 基于原位浸水试验的黄土软化力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1851-1864.
[14] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[15] 包卫星, 田磊, 吴谦, 黄志明, 张智勇. 伊犁黄土水分入渗特征及其对湿陷变形的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1379-1391.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!