岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 980-992.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0243CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0243

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

赤泥、钢渣与粉煤灰中硅、铝、钙元素在碱性及硫酸盐环境下的溶解动力学研究

崔雯雯1, 2,董晓强1, 3,尹顺德2,贺高乐1,赵睿阳1   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 滑铁卢大学 土木与环境工程系,加拿大 滑铁卢市; 3. 土木工程防灾与控制山西省重点实验室,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-09 接受日期:2025-05-06 出版日期:2026-03-17 发布日期:2026-03-23
  • 通讯作者: 董晓强,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境岩土等方面的研究。E-mail: dongxiaoqiang@tyut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:崔雯雯,女,2000年生,博士研究生,主要从事环境岩土方面的研究。E-mail: cuiwenwen0089@link.tyut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52378360,No.51978438);三晋英才计划科技创新领军人才项目;中国国家留学基金委资助(No.202406930021)。

Dissolution kinetics of silicon, aluminum, and calcium in red mud, steel slag, and fly ash under alkaline and sulfate environments

CUI Wen-wen1, 2, DONG Xiao-qiang1, 3, YIN Shun-de2, HE Gao-le1, ZHAO Rui-yang1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada; 3. Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Control, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2025-03-09 Accepted:2025-05-06 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-03-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52378360, 51978438), the Technology Innovation Leading Talent Program of the Sanjin Talent Plan and the China Scholarship Council Program (202406930021).

摘要: 全球水泥行业贡献约8%的二氧化碳排放,利用赤泥、钢渣、粉煤灰等低碳废弃物替代水泥对碳中和具有重要意义。针对其低反应性限制岩土工程应用的问题,提出碱性−硫酸盐协同激发方法,通过背散射电子能谱、X射线衍射等技术揭示微观结构与反应动力学规律。试验表明,碱性溶液浓度、温度、溶出时间、固液比和硫酸盐浓度显著影响废弃物中Si、Al、Ca的溶出过程。动力学分析证实溶出过程符合收缩核模型的内扩散机制,其中Si在碱性条件下活化能较低,溶解活性较高;而Ca的活化能较高,溶出速率对温度更敏感。分子动力学模拟结果显示,在NaOH-Na2SO4体系中,Si和Al分别以 和Al(OH)4⁻形式存在。研究为低碳岩土材料的开发提供了理论依据,并助力建筑业低碳转型。

关键词: 工业固废, 影响因素, 硅、铝、钙离子的溶出, 动力学模型, 溶解机制

Abstract: The global cement industry contributes approximately 8% of carbon dioxide emissions. Utilizing low-carbon wastes such as red mud, steel slag, and fly ash to replace cement is of great significance for carbon neutrality. To address the issue of their low reactivity in geotechnical engineering applications, this study proposes an alkaline-sulfate synergistic activation method. Techniques such as backscattered electron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction were employed to reveal the microstructural characteristics and reaction kinetics. Experimental results indicate that the concentration of alkaline solution, temperature, dissolution time, solid-to-liquid ratio, and sulfate concentration significantly affect the dissolution of Si, Al, and Ca from the waste materials. Kinetic analysis confirms that the dissolution process follows the internal diffusion mechanism of the shrinking-core model. Among the elements, Si has a lower activation energy under alkaline conditions, resulting in higher dissolution reactivity, while Ca has a higher activation energy, making its dissolution rate more temperature-sensitive. Molecular dynamics simulations show that in the NaOH-Na2SO4 system, Si and Al exist in the form of and Al(OH)4⁻, respectively. This study provides a theoretical foundation for the development of low-carbon geotechnical materials and supports the low-carbon transformation of the construction industry.

Key words: industrial solid waste, influencing factors, leaching of silicon, aluminum, and calcium ions, kinetic model, dissolution mechanism

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 张冬梅, 张学亮, 杜伟伟, . 基于离散单元法的渗流侵蚀作用下桩基位移与承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1181-1189.
[2] 雷华阳, 薄钰, 马长远, 王磊, 章纬地, . 多因素影响下黏土比热容变化规律及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 1-11.
[3] 许彬, 刘新荣, 周小涵, 梁越, 钟祖良, 刘俊, 邓志云. 考虑贯通型结构面强度震动退化的岩质边坡动力稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2419-2431.
[4] 曾召田, 梁珍, 孙凌云, 付慧丽, 范理云, 潘斌, 于海浩, . 水泥胶结钙质砂导热系数的影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 88-96.
[5] 黄智刚, 左清军, 吴立, 陈福榜, 胡圣松, 朱盛, . 水岩作用下泥质板岩软化非线性机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2931-2942.
[6] 杨军, 魏庆龙, 王亚军, 高玉兵, 侯世林, 乔博文, . 切顶卸压无煤柱自成巷顶板变形 机制及控制对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 989-998.
[7] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[8] 周翠英, 黄思宇, 刘镇, 陆仪启, . 红层软岩软化的界面过程及其动力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3189-3196.
[9] 尹黎阳, 唐朝生, 谢约翰, 吕超, 蒋宁俊, 施斌, . 微生物矿化作用改善岩土材料性能的影响因素[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2525-2546.
[10] 钟祖良, 别聪颖, 范一飞, 刘新荣, 罗亦琦, 涂义亮, . 土石混合体注浆扩散机制及影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4194-4202.
[11] 胡明鉴, 张晨阳, 崔翔, 李焜耀, 唐健健, . 钙质砂中毛细水高度与影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4157-4164.
[12] 耿 哲,李树忱,赵世森,张靖宇. 泥水平衡盾构顶推力非线性动力学分析与应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 469-476.
[13] 夏才初,吕志涛,黄继辉,李 强, . 寒区隧道围岩最大冻结深度计算的半解析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2145-2154.
[14] 石泉彬,杨 平,于 可,汤国毅,. 冻土与结构接触面次峰值冻结强度试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2025-2034.
[15] 王正振,龚维明,戴国亮,王晓阳,李亮亮,肖 刚,. 厚垫层-砂桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3755-3762.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!