岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1659-1671.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0403CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0403

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于有效造浪体积的碎屑流运动-造浪机制研究

寇华垚1, 2,黄波林1, 2,张鹏1, 2,张杰1, 2,李秋旺1, 2,董星辰1, 2,罗方洋1, 2   

  1. 1. 湖北长江三峡滑坡国家野外科学观测研究站,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-16 接受日期:2025-09-30 出版日期:2026-05-11 发布日期:2026-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 黄波林,男,1979年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事水库地质灾害及涌浪灾害方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: bolinhuang@aliyun.com
  • 作者简介:寇华垚,男,2001年生,硕士研究生,主要从事地质灾害及涌浪灾害方面的研究。E-mail: 19986544133@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. U23A2045);三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室(三峡大学)开放基金(No. 2023KDZ17)。

Mechanism of debris-flow-induced impulse waves based on effective wave-making volume

KOU Hua-yao1, 2, HUANG Bo-lin1, 2, ZHANG Peng1, 2, ZHANG Jie1, 2, LI Qiu-wang1, 2, DONG Xing-chen1, 2, LUO Fang-yang1, 2   

  1. 1. Hubei Yangtze Three Gorges Landslide National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. Civil Engineering & Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002,China
  • Received:2025-04-16 Accepted:2025-09-30 Online:2026-05-11 Published:2026-05-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U23A2045) and the Open Foundation of the Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area (China Three Gorges University), Ministry of Education (2023KDZ17).

摘要:

碎屑流持续冲击水体过程中,仅部分碎屑流颗粒主导最大涌浪波幅形成,准确估算该部分碎屑流颗粒体积,对防灾控灾有重大科学、工程价值。采用二维物理模型开展碎屑流-造浪物理模拟试验,通过改变碎屑流斜坡坡度、运动路径坡度、下部水体水深、碎屑流启动高程、碎屑流体积、碎屑流粒径等因素,研究多因素条件下的碎屑流-造浪作用机制,并推导出基于有效造浪体积的首浪最大波幅预测公式。研究结果表明:(1)碎屑流-造浪过程中,在碎屑流入水引发的涌浪远离碎屑流所影响水体范围前,进入水体的那部分碎屑流体积是有效造浪体积,是决定碎屑流-造浪过程中首浪波幅的大小的首要因素。(2)试验表明,碎屑流运动性显著影响有效造浪体积占比。当斜坡坡度为中高倾角且不小于运动路径坡度时,碎屑流运动性较高,有效造浪体积占比达50%~100%;而当斜坡坡度为低倾角且小于运动路径坡度时,碎屑流运动性较低,有效造浪体积占比仅为20%~38%。由于有效造浪体积占比的差异,总碎屑流体积较大但有效占比低的工况,其首浪最大波幅反而低于总体积较小但有效占比高的工况。(3)提出适用性表征参数k,当k值在0.10~2.59范围内时,推导的有效造浪体积计算公式和波幅预测公式具有较好的适用性。研究结果可为碎屑流-造浪地质灾害链的成灾机制及其防护工程设计提供理论依据。

关键词: 碎屑流, 造浪, 刚性体, 有效造浪体积

Abstract: During sustained debris flow impacts on water bodies, only a portion of debris particles governs the formation of maximum impulse wave amplitudes. Accurately determining the volume of these critical particles is of significant scientific and engineering value for disaster prevention and mitigation. This study utilizes a two-dimensional physical model to conduct simulation experiments on debris flow and impulse waves. By varying factors such as the debris flow slope gradient, movement path slope, water depth, debris flow initiation elevation, debris flow volume, and particle size, we investigate the mechanism of debris flow-wave interaction under multiple conditions and derive a prediction formula for the maximum first-wave amplitude based on effective wave-making volume. Key findings include: 1) In debris flow-impulse wave processes, the portion of debris that enters the water before the impulse wave propagates beyond the range of water body influenced by the debris flow constitutes the effective wave-making volume, which is the primary factor determining the amplitude of the first wave in the debris flow-wave process.     2) Experimental results demonstrate that the mobility of the debris flow significantly influences the proportion of the effective wave-making volume. When slope gradients are moderate to high inclination angle and is not less than the movement path slope, the debris flow exhibits high mobility, and the proportion of effective wave-making volume reaches 50% to 100%. Conversely, at low inclination angle and is less than the movement path slope, the debris flow mobility is lower, and the proportion of effective wave-making volume is only 20% to 38%. Notably, scenarios with smaller total volumes but higher effective proportions exhibit larger maximum first-wave amplitudes compared to scenarios with larger total debris volumes but lower effective proportions. 3) A dimensionless parameter k is proposed to characterize applicability, When the value of k is within the range of 0.10 to 2.59, the derived calculation formula for the effective wave-making volume and the wave amplitude prediction formula demonstrate strong applicability. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for understanding disaster mechanisms in debris flow-impulse wave hazard chains and for designing protective engineering measures.

Key words: debris flow, impulse wave, rigid body, effective wave-making volume

中图分类号: P 588
[1] 张贝, 李文阳, 毕研栋, 黄雨, . 离心-科氏复合条件下体积对滑坡碎屑流流动性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1560-1569.
[2] 王东坡, 李沁泽, 毕钰璋, 刘浩. 碎屑流高风险区桩群防护结构优化布局研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1323-1332.
[3] 吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑 流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[4] 郑光, 许强, 彭双麒. 岩质滑坡−碎屑流的运动距离计算公式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4897-4906.
[5] 肖思友, 苏立君, 姜元俊, 李丞, 刘振宇, . 坡度对碎屑流冲击立式拦挡墙力学特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[6] 雷先顺,朱大勇,刘 诚,卢坤林,陈菊香, . 考虑滑道坡度和宽度的滑坡模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1281-1288.
[7] 杜国梁,张永双,姚 鑫,郭长宝,杨志华|. 都江堰市五里坡高位滑坡-碎屑流成因机制分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 493-501.
[8] 费建波,介玉新,张丙印,傅旭东. 土的三维破坏准则在颗粒流模型中的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1809-1817.
[9] 季宪军,梁 瑛 ,欧国强 ,杨 顺 ,王 钧 ,陆桂红,. 黏性碎屑流坡面运动过程数值模拟与检验[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2402-2408.
[10] 郝明辉 ,许 强 ,杨 磊 ,杨兴国 ,周家文 , . 滑坡-碎屑流物理模型试验及运动机制探讨[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 127-132.
[11] 李祥龙 ,唐辉明 ,熊承仁 ,罗红明 . 基底刮铲效应对岩石碎屑流停积过程的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1527-1534.
[12] 鲁晓兵 ,张旭辉 ,崔 鹏. 碎屑流沿坡面运动的数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 524-527.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!